Search results

It’s an illness clearly.

I’m actually glad we finally have leader who is trying to get things done and not playing stupid games. We just need an official opposition to do the same and we might actually have a serious parliament for once

You quite literally pulled a what about Trudeau and then criticized him with that. LOL. Never change Jarn. Never change.

Did you really think that a signed trade deal just happens with a visit?

Absolutely. And Baden Powell based scouting on his use of cadets during the Boer War.

Sort of how it’s supposed to start…

So who is telling the truth here?

I think you misquoted me. I never said what you responded to.

Allies generally adds legitimacy to whatever action they undertake. Soft power helps with that. They’ve abandoned soft power.

Or maybe they remember a few weeks ago the US minimized the deaths and contributions that both Spain and the UK made in support of the US invocation of Article 5.

I accept that argument. But only a second chance for a leader if gains can be made. Those gains have to also outweigh any losses.

And certainly an activist agenda that has embedded itself in it.

Except last time it was the CPC treatment of the media that contributed to its failure at the polls. Strangely it worked for the LPC. They found their unicorn, a conservative one, and staved off disaster.

If they can be adult about it, the party needs new leadership. James Moore or someone similar would be my choice. My fear is that they would pick a Jivani. Leaving us with no real alternatives again.

No, it’s either you are being deliberately obtuse and trolling which I am not surprised due to you posting bad faith questions or you are thick. I don’t think you are thick but you are working hard to convince me you are.

Now you are just beclowning yourself. I tried but I can’t help you.

Pierre had a pillow over that Pierre’s head. I’m sure he had a severe nose bleed after this.

Go back and read his full statement about that. You are reading into it what you want not what it actually says and what/who the statement is aimed at.

If people read the actual quote, yes. It’s been constant with his message for the last year. “We do, however, take this position with regret, because the current conflict is another example of the failure of the international order."

Not really. It’s basically “we support your action, but regret that it has come to this” It’s not hard to understand.