• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

2022 CPC Leadership Discussion: Et tu Redeux

There might be an element of "rural cosplay" with our ratepayers association.

They may figure keeping the lawns and trees "sidewalk free" makes the area seem "semi-rural". < smile

"We have a beautiful, natural neighborhood and now they want to citify it."
Maybe if it worried less about shunning sidewalks to create a pretenda-rural life, and focused more on keeping concrete ceilings in low-cost housing from falling and crushing residents, it would put less of a demand on first responders… 🤷🏻‍♂️

 
Maybe if it worried less about shunning sidewalks to create a pretenda-rural life, and focused more on keeping concrete ceilings in low-cost housing from falling and crushing residents, it would put less of a demand on first responders… 🤷🏻‍♂️


Nice try... < smile emoji

Swansea Mews is Toronto Community Housing.

No more relevant to the ratepayer's associations than Ottawa's public housing projects are to Ottawa's ratepayer associations.



 
There might be an element of "rural cosplay" with our ratepayers association.

They may figure keeping the lawns and trees "sidewalk free" makes the area seem "semi-rural". < smile

"We have a beautiful, natural neighborhood and now they want to citify it."

More like poor city planning in that town.
 
Nice try... < smile emoji

Swansea Mews is Toronto Community Housing.

No more relevant to the ratepayer's associations than Ottawa's public housing projects are to Ottawa's ratepayer associations.
Nor unrelated. A sign of malaise in Toronto’s ‘Nirvanna.’

‘Swanseans’ like to pretend they’re just like their neighbours in The Kingsway, but one has to question how having a big park and no sidewalks is any kind of status symbol within Metro..,
 
More like poor city planning in that town.

Don't know about urban planning, but 25% of all local streets in our town do not have a sidewalk. And many more only have a sidewalk on one side of the street.

Our neighbourhood was originally a separate municipality, the Village of Swansea until it was annexed in 1967.

So, city planners were not involved.

( One pleasant aspect of the annexation was the agreement that garbage was picked up outside their side door, rather than from the curb. )

The natural boundaries are Lake Ontario, the Humber River and Grenadier Pond. There is also an elongated pond ( Catfish ) running noth-south.

The Town Hall is the home of the second smallest of the 100 library branches in the city.

A new sidewalk can only be installed on an existing local street after the local councillor completes a consult with the neighbourhood and there is a consensus supporting the installation.

Our neighbourhood association says no dice.

Reasons being sidewalks have to be cleared by the adjoining landowner. They might result in the removal of landscaping or trees. And some just want to keep outsiders out of the neighbourhood. Some feel their property values are higher without sidewalks.

Our streets are hilly and wind around ravines. Last I heard, the city was offering artisanal cobblestone sidewalks winding through the neighbourhood. Not the more familiar ugly slabs of grey-beige squares.

‘Swanseans’ like to pretend they’re just like their neighbours in The Kingsway,

BZ if that is your best shot.

I am sure you know local housing prices better than I do.
 
BZ if that is your best shot.

I am sure you know local housing prices better than I do.
Just a relay from friends living in The Kingsway who have an acquaintance in Swansea who’s always going on about how life in Swansea is so much better than The Kingsway, and they laugh and just respond with, “it’s all Metro Toronto anyway…” 🤷🏻‍♂️
 
‘Swanseans’ like to pretend they’re just like their neighbours in The Kingsway,

Just a relay from friends living in The Kingsway who have an acquaintance in Swansea who’s always going on about how life in Swansea is so much better than The Kingsway, and they laugh and just respond with, “it’s all Metro Toronto anyway…” 🤷🏻‍♂️

You obviously know the local housing market better than I do.

Guess I better sell...

What you said hurt me very much. I cried all the way to the bank. - Liberace
 
A highlights package from the interview via The Canadian Press (also archived here), shared under the Fair Dealing provisions of the Copyright Act (R.S.C., 1985, c. C-42) ...

"OTTAWA - Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre gave a lengthy interview to psychologist and media personality Jordan Peterson, touching on his vision for Canada and how he plans to implement it.

Here's what we learned from the interview, which was recorded on Dec. 21 and released Friday:

Election now

Poilievre has no qualms with a federal election taking place during a possible Liberal leadership race. Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is facing increasing calls, including within his own caucus, to step down.

"The Canadian people are not obliged — 41 million people are not obliged to wait around while this party sorts out its s--t. Like, these guys could have got rid of Trudeau a year and a half ago."

Big energy companies have been "complete idiots" about carbon policy

Poilievre chided Canada's energy sector for seeming to go along with Liberal policies such as on the environment.

"The Big Five oil companies in Canada have idiot lobbyists. They have brilliant workers, incredible workers, but idiot lobbyists. And they've been trying to suck up for the last 10 years and did nothing to support the right policies in the prior years. So that's going to have to change."

He deems his opposition to be communist

Poilievre says Trudeau has governed with "an extremely radical ideology" that is "basically authoritarian socialism," and says the NDP would have done exactly the same if they were in power.

He also says "it is a classic for socialists" to try to disown what they've done and change their names.

"First they were communists, and then they became socialist, and then they became social democrats, and then they became — they stole the word liberal, and then they ruined that word. They changed their name to progressives, and then they changed their name to woke. And now they claim they don't want to be called woke anymore," he said.

Poilievre added that his appeal to young voters is that "they've learned that (government) help is the sunny side of control."

Lots of land

Poilievre argued the lack of homes in Canada is an "entirely political" problem because the country has such a large land mass.

"It should be dirt cheap, because we have the most dirt. We just need to get the government out of the way," he said.

"There is no physical, geographic reason why Canada should struggle to supply people with great opportunities of home ownership and family formation."

He won't moderate

Poilievre says he won't try to shift his policies to the centre or left, saying it would only lead to bad results and is "the mistake that conservative parties around the world have made countless times."

"Does the temptation exist to try and take on the political policies of the socialists in the short term? Sure, but it's one that I will fiercely resist, because I know that by the fourth year of my mandate, people would be enraged, because their lives would be even worse."

He also said he would focus on problems facing Canadian families instead of on tackling issues on the global scale.

"People are sick and tired of grandiosity," he said, rejecting "this horrendous, utopian wokeism" that serves "egotistical personalities on top" instead of "common people."

No hyphens, please

"We're not interested in the world's ethnocultural conflicts," Poilievre said, praising multiculturalism but saying people who come to Canada need to leave their baggage back in their home countries.

"Most people come here to get away from those things. So by getting back to a common sense of values and identity, and reminding people that they are — when they get here, they are Canadian first. Canada first. Leave the hyphens; we don't need to be a hyphenated society."

He urged Canadians to "put aside race, this obsession with race that wokeism has reinserted."

Poilievre also echoed comments he previously made when asked about Pride events, saying he wants people to be "judged based on their individual character and humanity, rather than by their group identity."

His plan to grow the economy

"We're going to cut bureaucracy, cut the consultants, cut foreign aid, cut back on corporate welfare to large corporations. We're going to use the savings to bring down the deficit and taxes and unleash the free-enterprise system," Poilievre pledged.

He plans to slash the Liberals' reform of regulation for megaprojects "to cause a massive resource boom in our country" and generate enough electricity to power data centres.

"We're going to bring back a monetary discipline to bring down inflation (and) stop the money printing," he said, arguing that because Parliament does not vote on whether to print money, "the inflation is adopted secretly."

The Bank of Canada has pushed back on claims that it is printing cash to finance the federal government. It said purchasing bonds has lowered interest rates so people could weather the COVID-19 pandemic, and this did not involve printing cash.

He lists his stars

When asked to list "people who will be key" in a Poilievre government, he noted four MPs from his front bench:

Former leader and House Speaker Andrew Scheer, who can navigate "procedural manoeuvres" in Parliament.

Infrastructure critic Leslyn Lewis, whom he praised for her work in that file. She ran for party leadership against Poilievre, and has backed a petition calling on Canada to pull out of the United Nations.

"Newcomers like Jamil Jivani," a former radio host who has a direct relationship with U.S. vice-president-elect JD Vance.

Deputy leader Melissa Lantsman, who is "extremely well liked in Toronto (and) very well known across the country."

Some sort of crackdown

Poilievre pledged "the biggest crackdown on crime in Canadian history, a massive crackdown" but was sparse on details when Peterson asked what that means, other than saying that "habitual offenders will not get out of jail anymore."

He says Peterson is a free-speech champion

Peterson was directed by the College of Psychologists of Ontario to undergo a remedial coaching program after social-media conduct that the college deemed to be degrading, demeaning and posing a risk to the public.

Peterson has lost three attempts to appeal the 2022 ruling, saying his freedom of speech has been impeded. His tweets included referring to a nonbinary city councillor as an "appalling self-righteous moralizing thing" and saying that "no amount of authoritarian tolerance" could make him deem one plus-size model to be beautiful.

Poilievre thanked Peterson for his "immense courage" in standing by his convictions.

"You've had a spine of steel, and there are countless other people who will have the freedom to express themselves because you paid the price for them."

Stronger than yesterday

When asked how he'd changed since becoming Conservative leader in fall 2022, Poilievre said he had learned to "take a punch" while taking on "vested interests" across Canada.

"I would say I'm tougher," he said. "I withstood those punches and as a result, I feel stronger now."

Little pushback on policy

The Liberals and NDP reacted to the interview by denouncing that Peterson's podcast episode had support from an Indiana-based Christian anti-abortion group that seeks to protect "pre-born" babies.

The Friday interview includes an ad from the group PreBorn, seeking donations. It includes the story of a woman who tried to order an abortion pill but it never arrived "by God's design" and the group ultimately convinced her to give birth.

"The Conservatives and Jordan Peterson are coming for women's rights," NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh said in a post on X that focused on the advertisement.

In another post later in the day, Singh took aim at American billionaire Elon Musk, who praised the interview on social media.

"Elon Musk and other billionaires back Pierre Poilievre because if he wins, they'll get richer," Singh said.

"Poilievre is clear in this interview that he will cut health care and more. He will cut from you, to give CEOs what they want."

The Liberal party similarly posted about Poilievre going on "a podcast sponsored by an anti-abortion group."

Abortion did not come up in the interview.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Jan. 3, 2025."
 
Well you know not too many Liberals have the time and energy to spend fighting Pierre's podcast. They are way too busy digging Trudeau's grave for his political career and sharpening their knives to stab said career in the back.
 
Well you know not too many Liberals have the time and energy to spend fighting Pierre's podcast.

Not sure how anyone can rationally defend this governments policies over the last few terms. Everything is a mess. The tired slogans of ‘We have more work to do’ and ‘We are here for Canadians’ is not going to stick. Liberals/NDP will ramp up their rhetoric of why PP is scary, not why they should be re-elected.
 
A highlights package from the interview via The Canadian Press (also archived here), shared under the Fair Dealing provisions of the Copyright Act (R.S.C., 1985, c. C-42) ...

"OTTAWA - Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre gave a lengthy interview to psychologist and media personality Jordan Peterson, touching on his vision for Canada and how he plans to implement it.

Here's what we learned from the interview, which was recorded on Dec. 21 and released Friday:

Election now

Poilievre has no qualms with a federal election taking place during a possible Liberal leadership race. Prime Minister Justin Trudeau is facing increasing calls, including within his own caucus, to step down.

"The Canadian people are not obliged — 41 million people are not obliged to wait around while this party sorts out its s--t. Like, these guys could have got rid of Trudeau a year and a half ago."

Big energy companies have been "complete idiots" about carbon policy

Poilievre chided Canada's energy sector for seeming to go along with Liberal policies such as on the environment.

"The Big Five oil companies in Canada have idiot lobbyists. They have brilliant workers, incredible workers, but idiot lobbyists. And they've been trying to suck up for the last 10 years and did nothing to support the right policies in the prior years. So that's going to have to change."

He deems his opposition to be communist

Poilievre says Trudeau has governed with "an extremely radical ideology" that is "basically authoritarian socialism," and says the NDP would have done exactly the same if they were in power.

He also says "it is a classic for socialists" to try to disown what they've done and change their names.

"First they were communists, and then they became socialist, and then they became social democrats, and then they became — they stole the word liberal, and then they ruined that word. They changed their name to progressives, and then they changed their name to woke. And now they claim they don't want to be called woke anymore," he said.

Poilievre added that his appeal to young voters is that "they've learned that (government) help is the sunny side of control."

Lots of land

Poilievre argued the lack of homes in Canada is an "entirely political" problem because the country has such a large land mass.

"It should be dirt cheap, because we have the most dirt. We just need to get the government out of the way," he said.

"There is no physical, geographic reason why Canada should struggle to supply people with great opportunities of home ownership and family formation."

He won't moderate

Poilievre says he won't try to shift his policies to the centre or left, saying it would only lead to bad results and is "the mistake that conservative parties around the world have made countless times."

"Does the temptation exist to try and take on the political policies of the socialists in the short term? Sure, but it's one that I will fiercely resist, because I know that by the fourth year of my mandate, people would be enraged, because their lives would be even worse."

He also said he would focus on problems facing Canadian families instead of on tackling issues on the global scale.

"People are sick and tired of grandiosity," he said, rejecting "this horrendous, utopian wokeism" that serves "egotistical personalities on top" instead of "common people."

No hyphens, please

"We're not interested in the world's ethnocultural conflicts," Poilievre said, praising multiculturalism but saying people who come to Canada need to leave their baggage back in their home countries.

"Most people come here to get away from those things. So by getting back to a common sense of values and identity, and reminding people that they are — when they get here, they are Canadian first. Canada first. Leave the hyphens; we don't need to be a hyphenated society."

He urged Canadians to "put aside race, this obsession with race that wokeism has reinserted."

Poilievre also echoed comments he previously made when asked about Pride events, saying he wants people to be "judged based on their individual character and humanity, rather than by their group identity."

His plan to grow the economy

"We're going to cut bureaucracy, cut the consultants, cut foreign aid, cut back on corporate welfare to large corporations. We're going to use the savings to bring down the deficit and taxes and unleash the free-enterprise system," Poilievre pledged.

He plans to slash the Liberals' reform of regulation for megaprojects "to cause a massive resource boom in our country" and generate enough electricity to power data centres.

"We're going to bring back a monetary discipline to bring down inflation (and) stop the money printing," he said, arguing that because Parliament does not vote on whether to print money, "the inflation is adopted secretly."

The Bank of Canada has pushed back on claims that it is printing cash to finance the federal government. It said purchasing bonds has lowered interest rates so people could weather the COVID-19 pandemic, and this did not involve printing cash.

He lists his stars

When asked to list "people who will be key" in a Poilievre government, he noted four MPs from his front bench:

Former leader and House Speaker Andrew Scheer, who can navigate "procedural manoeuvres" in Parliament.

Infrastructure critic Leslyn Lewis, whom he praised for her work in that file. She ran for party leadership against Poilievre, and has backed a petition calling on Canada to pull out of the United Nations.

"Newcomers like Jamil Jivani," a former radio host who has a direct relationship with U.S. vice-president-elect JD Vance.

Deputy leader Melissa Lantsman, who is "extremely well liked in Toronto (and) very well known across the country."

Some sort of crackdown

Poilievre pledged "the biggest crackdown on crime in Canadian history, a massive crackdown" but was sparse on details when Peterson asked what that means, other than saying that "habitual offenders will not get out of jail anymore."

He says Peterson is a free-speech champion

Peterson was directed by the College of Psychologists of Ontario to undergo a remedial coaching program after social-media conduct that the college deemed to be degrading, demeaning and posing a risk to the public.

Peterson has lost three attempts to appeal the 2022 ruling, saying his freedom of speech has been impeded. His tweets included referring to a nonbinary city councillor as an "appalling self-righteous moralizing thing" and saying that "no amount of authoritarian tolerance" could make him deem one plus-size model to be beautiful.

Poilievre thanked Peterson for his "immense courage" in standing by his convictions.

"You've had a spine of steel, and there are countless other people who will have the freedom to express themselves because you paid the price for them."

Stronger than yesterday

When asked how he'd changed since becoming Conservative leader in fall 2022, Poilievre said he had learned to "take a punch" while taking on "vested interests" across Canada.

"I would say I'm tougher," he said. "I withstood those punches and as a result, I feel stronger now."

Little pushback on policy

The Liberals and NDP reacted to the interview by denouncing that Peterson's podcast episode had support from an Indiana-based Christian anti-abortion group that seeks to protect "pre-born" babies.

The Friday interview includes an ad from the group PreBorn, seeking donations. It includes the story of a woman who tried to order an abortion pill but it never arrived "by God's design" and the group ultimately convinced her to give birth.

"The Conservatives and Jordan Peterson are coming for women's rights," NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh said in a post on X that focused on the advertisement.

In another post later in the day, Singh took aim at American billionaire Elon Musk, who praised the interview on social media.

"Elon Musk and other billionaires back Pierre Poilievre because if he wins, they'll get richer," Singh said.

"Poilievre is clear in this interview that he will cut health care and more. He will cut from you, to give CEOs what they want."

The Liberal party similarly posted about Poilievre going on "a podcast sponsored by an anti-abortion group."

Abortion did not come up in the interview.

This report by The Canadian Press was first published Jan. 3, 2025."

Yup, I agree with PP. Now let's get him a majority Gov and see if he and his team will walk the walk.

I'm fully prepared to be disappointed.
 
Poillievre has spoken recently about reducing CPP deductions; something about ‘powerful paychecks’, though the skeptic in me suspects it’s more about reducing employer side payroll taxes. Has anyone see him commit to a position on what this would mean for actual CPP benefits? I cannot see him accomplishing any meaningful reduction in CPP contributions without it reducing the eventual benefits.
 
Poillievre has spoken recently about reducing CPP deductions; something about ‘powerful paychecks’, though the skeptic in me suspects it’s more about reducing employer side payroll taxes. Has anyone see him commit to a position on what this would mean for actual CPP benefits? I cannot see him accomplishing any meaningful reduction in CPP contributions without it reducing the eventual benefits.
CPP is going to be a massive drain in the next 20 years due to the boomers being fully retired/dying off. Lowering the input would have to mean lowering the output; otherwise you're left with the same "budget balances itself" scenario we currently are in.

I think he's playing to the youth vote over seniors because most people under 35 are dealing with immediate financial pressures instead of thinking about their future.

Its why the 25 year CAF pension is not as big a draw as it once was to the youth we are trying to attract. I have seen many new troops mocking call it the "Golden Handcuffs" accordingly.

If you have no assets, no investments, no hope of retiring comfortably at 65, and eggs are 5.99 a dozen; its easy to say "fuck paying into CPP every money and pay me the $150 now."
 
CPP is going to be a massive drain in the next 20 years due to the boomers being fully retired/dying off. Lowering the input would have to mean lowering the output; otherwise you're left with the same "budget balances itself" scenario we currently are in.

I think he's playing to the youth vote over seniors because most people under 35 are dealing with immediate financial pressures instead of thinking about their future.

Its why the 25 year CAF pension is not as big a draw as it once was to the youth we are trying to attract. I have seen many new troops mocking call them the "Golden Handcuff" accordingly.

If you have no assets, no investments, no hope of retiring comfortably at 65, and eggs are 5.99 a dozen; fuck paying into CPP every money and pay me the $150 now.

An 18 year old joining CAF now has an average life expectancy of 80. That 25 year CAF pensions starts looking more and more significant as they approach being able to take it, I suspect.

Any harm to public pensions now would be a ‘right now’ political benefit knowing that the screw-over comes 30 or 40 years down the road. And of course it’s a move being made by someone with fantastic benefits most Canadians will never come remotely close to.

I’m financially set with or without CPP, so it’s not a big deal for me, but a lot of Canadians don’t realize how essential that money will be in retirement. I’m extremely wary of anyone pushing policy that would weaken it.
 
Last I read the Chief Actuary assessed CPP as comfortably viable through 75 years- with legislated contributions exceeding the minimum amount to maintain that status.

Might some fat to trim without it being a zero sum game
 
An 18 year old joining CAF now has an average life expectancy of 80. That 25 year CAF pensions starts looking more and more significant as they approach being able to take it, I suspect.

Any harm to public pensions now would be a ‘right now’ political benefit knowing that the screw-over comes 30 or 40 years down the road. And of course it’s a move being made by someone with fantastic benefits most Canadians will never come remotely close to.

I’m financially set with or without CPP, so it’s not a big deal for me, but a lot of Canadians don’t realize how essential that money will be in retirement. I’m extremely wary of anyone pushing policy that would weaken it.
I agree wholeheartedly, but I too am not your average 36 year old Canadian. Having seen my father work in a gig economy, have nothing to show for, and scrape by well into his 70s with a OAS/CPP cheque motivates the hell out of me not to let a good thing go to waste.

The problem I see with my own teenagers is that they and their peers have no motivation to play the long game. They saw the long game fuck everyone over in 2008, 2019, during COVID, and where we are now. They are disinterested or dissolutioned in the idea you can climb up the ladder with education, because none of them will be able to afford to carry that debt along with their cost of living. They know that companies aren't promoting up, so they're no loyal to one employer or another and will jump ship if the vibes are off. They aren't incentivized by benefits, because you can't pay a mortgage in benefits.

So there is the crux of their reasoning and what PP and the CPC is banking on: Fuck you, pay me. Look at the LPC Ads, for example. They're talking to people who already have security in this current environment. Homeowners, people with families (who are much older than 18-25), pensioners, folks who would choose who they vote for akin to what shade of pink to paint the powder room. That is not the lifestyle of most Millenial/Gen Z/Gen A kids coming up to voting age.

On the flip side, the CPC are presenting the opposite narrative for immediate relief and gratification: cut everything that gives those "others" support to put more money in your pocket. Cut anything that doesn't generate jobs, housing, or increases our economy. The follow on effects are not worth the immediate payout if we do this.

Fuck you, pay me.

I would love to see what that looks like 40 years down the road, but I will hopefully be in a retirement facility playing Cribbage and telling the nurses I used to tie an onion to my belt; which was the style at the time.
 
Last edited:
The pension and daycare thing has already hit the tv ad world
Which we know, by informing ourselves of the result of Canadian Parliament’s Vote on Bill C-35, Child Care, vote #385 on June 19, 2023, to be factually wrong. Essentially, the Liberal ad LIED to Canadians, but hey, some voters will believe the “I heard he [Poilievre] voted against child day care… 😱 “ Clearly Ms. Liberal Canadian portrayed in the ad heard wrong.

The facts are that 100% of Conservatives, all 110/110 voted for the Child Care legislation.

Ironically, not all Liberal MPs voted for it. 98.7% of Liberals voted YEA, 151/153. Two Liberal MPs paired their votes with Bloq Quebecois members who did not vote.
IMG_5544.jpeg
 
Back
Top