• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

2025 Federal Election - 28 Apr 25

I'm not worried. Reneging on that would be a death knell to the CPC. We all know what his policy is, no need to set Poly's hair on fire with just a few days left. Not discussing it sucks all the oxygen from that faction. If its not upfront, not many detractors will even think about the firearms issue. Canning the liberal plan will save millions at a comparatively small cost. I think it was a good move not mentioning it.
So not mentioning firearms at all is fine, but the CPC also felt the need to explicitly mention keeping the retirement age at 65 was needed? The party is all over the place
 
Not many people are going to be swayed by the platforms. Their minds are already made up.

There's not even a requirement for parties to release a costed policy statement. Its good politics to do so, but nothing says they have to. So there's no real format to follow. Parties can release what they want.
 
Some weird stuff in this platform.

image.png

So scrap the hike and put in a new one?

image.png

This one wasn’t on my bingo card.

And it looks like their whole revenue stream is predicated that the economy will take off assuming provinces and indegenous groups get on board with pipelines.

No wonder they waited for this to drop…
 
Not many people are going to be swayed by the platforms. Their minds are already made up.

There's not even a requirement for parties to release a costed policy statement. Its good politics to do so, but nothing says they have to. So there's no real format to follow. Parties can release what they want.
a lot of hopes, wishful thinking, and phantom numbers dont make a good platform, I wanna know what they were smoking that the GST housing pledge would cost the gov less than 2 billion
 
So not mentioning firearms at all is fine, but the CPC also felt the need to explicitly mention keeping the retirement age at 65 was needed? The party is all over the place
Under the last CPC government retirement age for OAS was raised to 67, so a promise not to do that again is valid.

(Though I agree with that change - it's good policy, but bad politics)
 
And it looks like their whole revenue stream is predicated that the economy will take off assuming provinces and indegenous groups get on board with pipelines.

No wonder they waited for this to drop…
If nothing else, the man is committed to his ideology. All of our current immediate problems will be fixed by the vision he's had since he was 16.
 
The Liberals wanted to move the fixed election date one week to the right to avoid a non-stat holiday Hindu festival that 95% of Canadians had no idea even existed until they brought up the idea, but they had no problem running advance polls on a Christian religious stat holiday weekend where election workers got paid overtime for two full days.
end of the day, advanced polls dates are set by elections canada, not the liberal party
 
end of the day, advanced polls dates are set by elections canada, not the liberal party
…and operating entirely within existing legislation.

Trudeau’s Diwalisuperannuation-delay would have required a legislative revision that would have required passing the House, Senate and as with all laws, receiving Royal Assent.
 
I had expected that, given the amount of time Poilievre and the CPC have had to respond to the various various crises over the past few years, we would now be seeing a more comprehensive, believable platform.
Nope. We got a cheesy marketing brochure that’s tries as hard as possible to not make a sale.
Now I’m starting to wonder if the CPC is intentionally throwing the vote.
 
Back
Top