You placed blind trust in trump when he would not reveal his holdings. In fact you defended him quite aggressively. You also said he was quite smart and we should not hate him for playing the game.
Evidence? Not playing that game with you again. You haven't identified Randy yet.
Heh. āBlind trustā.
I didn't say anyone was confused.
Yes. Deficits all around. Hence my criticism of the CPC: they're always going to lose a bidding war to the LPC and/or NDP; they shouldn't go down that path.
The question is whether the people who might qualify but didn't luck into a spot have really come to grips with paying taxes for the program but not benefiting. A few weeks back a figure cited for coverage ("10$ a day care) in BC was about 10%.
Clearly you know NOTHING about day care in this day and age. It is absolutely NOT just "babysitting". They actually teach kids things at day care. Obviously, nothin very advanced; these are kids between then ages of 18 months and 5 years, after all. But they teach them how to recognize numbers and how to count, they teach them the alphabet, they teach them to recognize and name colours, they teach them the idea of primary colours and how to mix colours, they teach them about shapes and object permanence, they teach them how to share, they teach them about sports and exercise, they teach them about animals; the idea of carnivores vs herbivores and omnivores; nocturnal vs diurnal...hell, my kid's day care potty trained my kids for me! (not that we weren't trying, but they were WAY more successful than we were)
I like how whenever there is a potential lack of funding for what should be a provincial responsibility it is always a Federal problem. Maybe Ford should step up, increase PST to fund provincial shortcomings such as childcare or health care instead of complaining about why someone else isnāt doing his job for him.
Those are my federal income tax dollars coming directly back to me in a tangible and identifiable way. If the feds cut the program, they wont reduce my taxes, they will just spend it somewhere else. So, why in the hell would I want to pay more in taxes via a provincial tax increase?
Policy Horizons is an internal "think tank" type department tasked with exploring various "what if" scenarios and their societal implications. That's a not a prediction, its the policy equivalent of a sand table excercise.
Sure, but in this case itās explicitly a federal policy plank where the Feds are contributing to achieving that policy platform on a national level. Right from the get go they accepted responsibility for this particular one.
Essentially a āred teamā for the government. I wished our elected decision makers paid them more heed.
Perhaps federal dollars should be spent on federal responsibilities like say, defense... Rather than vote buying.
What a cynical attitude. A program that has actually helped many Canadians in a very direct, significant, and tangible way, but to you that's just "vote buying"?
I would contend that Canadaās low and falling birth rate is a long term, pan-Canadian strategic problem. As a policy intended to make having kids more affordable, it applies itself to that issue and can be justified as a federal endeavour in that way. Same as EI maternity/parental leave.
Not many people do.
The following people are all in competition:
