2026 US-Denmark Tensions/End of NATO

[YZT580]

What about man walking with dinosaurs…..anyone?

Why not? The following is a direct quote of a conversation between the scientist that discovered soft tissue in Dinosaur fossils and her supervisor.

There is considerable research on this now so this isn't limited to being a "creationist" thing. Evolutionary scientists have lots of theories but all are defeated by the laws of thermodynamics and the sheer amount of time that they claim exists between dinosaurs and your footprints. They are hoping to discover some hidden elixir but so far it remains one of those miracles


This caused immense consternation. Schweitzer’s supervisor Jack Horner wrote:

‘When Mary was first working on this material, she called me up to say she had found osteocytes. I assumed she meant the spaces where the osteocytes would have been, which is what I suggested.

“No, Jack, actually we have the cells and they have filopodia

“Mary, the freaking creationists are just going to love you.”

“Jack, it’s your dinosaur.

”Make of it as you wish but stop mocking what you know nothing about.

 

[Retired AF Guy]

To many, The Flintstones was a documentary.

The same folks who think the X-Files is a documentary.

 

[daftandbarmy]

https://twitter.com/x/status/2015489807074709627

 

[Kirkhill]

Mark Rutte....Europe still needs the US in NATO and the Arctic is an issue.

https://www.cnn.com/2026/01/26/europe/nato-chief-rutte-european-defense-us-intl

The alternative, time, a regional nuclear deterrent of their own and 10% of GDP.

And, he should have added, consensus.

 

[MrWhyt]

”Make of it as you wish but stop mocking what you know nothing about.

from:

https://biologos.org/articles/not-so-dry-bones-an-interview-with-mary-schweitzer

One thing that does bother me, though, is that young earth creationists take my research and use it for their own message, and I think they are misleading people about it. Pastors and evangelists, who are in a position of leadership, are doubly responsible for checking facts and getting things right, but they have misquoted me and misrepresented the data.

So, that leaves us with two alternatives for interpretation: either the dinosaurs aren’t as old as we think they are, or maybe we don’t know exactly how these things get preserved.

If you believe 24/7 creation is really the only interpretation possible and ignore tons of evidence that the earth is billions of years old and that life was a simple construct that got way more complex over time, that’s fine—we may be wrong about the science (I don’t think we are, but as a scientist I have to leave that minute possibility open). I think that parents need to tell their kids that there are a lot of REASONS scientists say what they do, and virtually NONE of those reasons are to disprove God’s existence. That doesn’t enter in.

pot, kettle etc.