2026 US-Denmark Tensions/End of NATO

[Kirkhill]

On reflection, the fact that the deal remains in place if Greenland secedes from Denmark may be an indicatator of the "long play".

Project 2025 wasn't written for Trump. It is more like a fifth column manifesto to remake the US and the world. It has objectives and patience. Trump has neither.

This is why the removal of Trump will not be close to enough to stop the remodelling of America.

My opinion is that this is a bad thing. My opinion matters not one jot. We are all along for the ride whether we want to be or not

My opinion is similar on Project 2025 and Trump. The Project predates and will outlast Trump.

I believe that Project 2025 was inevitable in the sense that a new plan was in order, the existing plan (Atlantic Charter et al), being widely held as unsustainable.

As to the relative merits of the new plan I am less bothered. Nobody gets what they want. Plans never survive. Even the master planners of the communist world feel it necessary to rewrite their plans every five years, often according to the whims of The Dear Genius of the day. Societal Inertia plays a great role in affairs.

The kerfuffle over NATO and NORAD and Greenland is an example. Where we are looks a lot like where we were. The difference is that everybody else is looking to the same threats as the Americans and planning to spend money that the Americans felt had to be spent. But now it is not American money being spent.

 

[Brad Sallows]

My opinion is similar on Project 2025 and Trump. The Project predates and will outlast Trump.

Surely such a thing cannot exist. Trump is all chaos and bombast; there could not possibly be any single - let alone multiple - agenda being advanced by people behind him. It is imperative that critics continue to focus their time and attention on the man, not on the evolution of policies within the administration.

 

[Kirkhill]

I got a chuckle the other week or so ago when Carney alluded to the National Policy of Sir John A as the effective counter to McKInley's tariffs so beloved by Trump.

First of all the Liberals of Laurier fought the National Policy and argued for free trade. Starting a pattern that continued through the Mulroney FTA and GST, Laurier retained the National Policy.

But the National Policy wasn't a natiional policy. It was an Imperial Policy. It was a policy that tied Canadian trade into the British Empire. It was a policy that allowed Canadians to travel around the world on a British passport, to sell wheat, grain and cheese to Britain along with iron, steel and copper, to build the ships of the Empress and Allen lines, and to make Massey tractors an international standard.

That Empire, that Trade Zone, that US competitor, is gone now. Destroyed by the actions of the US through two world wars.

But we're better off without the Brits.

 

[Czech_pivo]

Surely such a thing cannot exist. Trump is all chaos and bombast; there could not possibly be any single - let alone multiple - agenda being advanced by people behind him. It is imperative that critics continue to focus their time and attention on the man, not on the evolution of policies within the administration.

It’s a fair hypothesis that all this Trump led chaos ends Jan 2029, but in the end it’s still a hypothesis.

 

[Brad Sallows]

It’s a fair hypothesis that all this Trump led chaos ends Jan 2029, but in the end it’s still a hypothesis.

The chaos goes away. The think tanks and their political access remain.