MilEME09
Army.ca Fixture
- Reaction score
- 7,232
- Points
- 1,210
possible, but with things like this it rarely stays quiet for long, even in the reserves.Especially with the Reservists.

possible, but with things like this it rarely stays quiet for long, even in the reserves.Especially with the Reservists.
Many people nowadays don't talk about certain subjects at work, but will let it out on forums where they feel safe. So quite possible their peers don't really know about their other lives.Depends... They can easily be smart enough to not say things at work. Particularly if they keep to themselves at work.
Hard to say, we have zero information about them beyond being on the site. As noted above they could easily be loners who don't talk to people at work much beyond talking about work.
I'm not saying it's impossible that people knew, I'm just pointing out that it is quite possible for them to live a "double life" and the CoC would have no idea. People do it all the time with regards to lots of things in their personal lives.
When people hold such strong views though, it can become noticeable in how they act at work around their peers.Many people nowadays don't talk about certain subjects at work, but will let it out on forums where they feel safe. So quite possible their peers don't really know about their other lives.
5 days a week, for sure, 3hrs a week, many can keep it to themselves for that long.When people hold such strong views though, it can become noticeable in how they act at work around their peers.
depends, we talking a Pte/cpl or leadership? Jr ranks, for sure, but once you are administering people, starts to get noticeable if Bloggins who is of a visible minority is a good troop but always gets the short end of the stick5 days a week, for sure, 3hrs a week, many can keep it to themselves for that long.
You can have bigots and racists who treat people fairly. Someone having biases doesn’t mean they inherently act upon them.depends, we talking a Pte/cpl or leadership? Jr ranks, for sure, but once you are administering people, starts to get noticeable if Bloggins who is of a visible minority is a good troop but always gets the short end of the stick
my example would be considered acting upon them, as overlooking someone for taskings, promotions etc based on race would be discriminationYou can have bigots and racists who treat people fairly. Someone having biases doesn’t mean they inherently act upon them.
Yes, but @Eaglelord17 was simply pointing out that they could have those feelings in private and not act on them at work.my example would be considered acting upon them, as overlooking someone for taskings, promotions etc based on race would be discrimination
That is also a rumor that one of them was signed-up for the site as a joke by friends... I'm not sure I believe it, but it wouldn't be the first time someone did something as a joke and it backfired terribly.
Probably not the guy commenting on X about using Bio weapons on India I would guess.Oof. Where are you seeing that?
Could the police lay charges against someone for hate speech or whatever if the user information came from an illegal activity (hacking) and not legally obtained with a production order to the host website? Would a production order to CBC for the user information they obtained hold up in court?Oof. Where are you seeing that?
Im no lawyer, but the comments made were public, it was the hacking that identified them, seems kinda a grey area.Could the police lay charges against someone for hate speech or whatever if the user information came from an illegal activity (hacking) and not legally obtained with a production order to the host website? Would a production order to CBC for the user information they obtained hold up in court?
Probably not the guy commenting on X about using Bio weapons on India I would guess.
Tough to say. Depends what specifically they want to use, and for what.Could the police lay charges against someone for hate speech or whatever if the user information came from an illegal activity (hacking) and not legally obtained with a production order to the host website? Would a production order to CBC for the user information they obtained hold up in court?
I heard it from a source with direct ties to the unit of one of the members listed, but I won't say more so I don't out my source.Oof. Where are you seeing that?