• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

A Deeply Fractured US

There are two ways to establish a "political centre".

One is to simply pick the midpoint between the medians or averages or other convenient point representations of two factions. This is useless for measuring extremism, since by definition the factions are always equidistant from it. It just obfuscates true extremism if one of the factions is moving away from the other at a much greater velocity.

Another is to pick the midpoint between two factions at a fixed point in time. Then extremism can be measured by comparing velocities relative to that point.

A majority is neither a necessary nor sufficient condition for declaring something "good".
 
Which Congress?

Democrats want a lot of legislation that won't be passed as-is by Republicans. They have nothing they're willing to trade away for compromise deals. Their work-around is to extend executive authority, and use whatever position they hold in Congress (House, Senate, Senate minority filibuster) to thwart attempts to exert congressional authority.

Republicans don't have a lot of new legislation they want. They mainly aim to restore the budgeting process ("regular order") and to reform big entitlements which are nearing the point at which benefits will be statutorily reduced (social security and medicare). They also want laws already written to be meaningfully enforced. None of these are arguably partisan aims. They, too, decline to check presidential authority, but mainly in order to support laws and programs already in place.

Democrats will one day hold the presidency and Congress again, even if only for a couple of years following a presidential election. I predict they will not act to restrain executive authority, just as they did not so act during the Obama and Biden administrations.

So American voters are left to choose between the Democratic bag of policies and Republican bag of policies. Voting on the principle of which party would restrain executive authority is almost pointless, with maybe a slight advantage to Republicans.
I agree. It would be like our success in eliminating FPTP or reining in the centralization of power in the PMO. Everybody talks a good line while in opposition or during an election.
 
I'm looking over the US Constitution. Can't seem to find where the President can commandeer television networks and prohibit professional sports on a weekend in December so (checks notes) the Army-Navy game can be broadcast without interruption or competition.

The signal I’m seeing is Trump blatantly pandering to the military at a ‘bread and circuses’ level. He’s never honoured service or sacrifice and certainly hasn’t started now. So why does he suddenly care about the army navy game?
 
Miller having another episode again publicly. This is who Trump surrounds himself with.
State and local police aren't obligated to provide support to federal law enforcement officers. However, they might usefully be employed to stop roving mobs of activists from assaulting "people who look like ICE" and occupying churches.
 
State and local police aren't obligated to provide support to federal law enforcement officers. However, they might usefully be employed to stop roving mobs of activists from assaulting "people who look like ICE" and occupying churches.
Then don't walk around wearing a chest rig, camo, masked, no ID, and acting like a douchebag and I'm pretty sure you won't be yelled at.
 
Then don't walk around wearing a chest rig, camo, masked, no ID, and acting like a douchebag and I'm pretty sure you won't be yelled at.
I wrote about ordinary people - not ICE members decked out in their gear - being assaulted, not yelled at. It shouldn't be hard to fathom the difference. It's mob violence; it's not even vigilantism - vigilantes at least usually go after people caught red-handed doing whatever crime offends the vigilantes.
 
Back
Top