• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

A Deeply Fractured US

From the perspective of "deeply fractured US", if scandal in Minnesota were being blown open right now with Walz as VP, the fracture would not be getting smaller.

I can't easily find a choice to prefer between a self-dealing president - with or without a foundation or a family business - and a self-dealing political party.

Realists acknowledge the need for beak-wetting in political money streams, but how much is tolerable?
 
Only people like you would justify a billion dollar scandal and somehow link it to “destroying NATO”. More emotional responses to Orangeman.
Um, you went on about it, somehow managed to link the LPC to it and mentioned avoiding a catastrophic disaster with Harris and Waltz.

Tell us YOU are being emotional without telling us. Then make that same accusation. LOL.
 
Only people like you would justify a billion dollar scandal and somehow link it to “destroying NATO”. More emotional responses to Orangeman.

Let's fast forward to the part where you and the normal MAGA crowd go off on a rant about TDS, or whatever the latest MAGA insults are.

It's very interesting that there's no way to see your profile, probably because a short look at your posting history will show it's all just pro-Trump MAGA junk. It's almost like you have one purpose here.

There's a few accounts here who are either drinking the cool-aid hard (And may as well just admit it) or are legitimately here just to pump-up Trump.
 
Names? Always good to keep tabs on this stuff.

I'm just a casual visitor, so I don't claim to know every post of every user, or anywhere close (That would be an insane amount of effort, LOL) but it certainly seems some members like Quirky (And a few others who are pretty obvious) like to go hard on justifying everything Trump does. Am I missing the full picture? Perhaps. It's just what I noticed the odd time I catch up on what's being posted here, and I do enjoy a lot of the content as it's an easy place to catch up on some of the news.

I've asked these members several times if they are die-hard MAGA / Trump supporters and all I've gotten in return is insults, and no evidence to suggest otherwise. I would assume since no reply when asked has ever suggested otherwise, they indeed are.

You can't view their profiles, so it's not like you can check to see if they've ever had other views. It's just an observation, after all this is just an open chat. No disrespect intended - and if they are legitimately pro-MAGA pro-Trump Canadians, their opinion is respected. I'm just pointing out it sure feels like they are an echo chamber of the latest MAGA views, which I think is very fair point and fair response to their posts.

Alternatively, if I was some hard left LPC / Pro-JT echo chamber, I would say it would be pretty fair to call that out as well (Not that case).
 
Thanks Mills Bomb. It's wise to keep track of sides for the coming invasion.

Previously you said:
It's very interesting that there's no way to see your profile, probably because a short look at your posting history will show it's all just pro-Trump MAGA junk.

Out of curiosity, are you aware your profile is also locked up and your posting history is hidden?
 
Last edited:
I'm just a casual visitor, so I don't claim to know every post of every user, or anywhere close (That would be an insane amount of effort, LOL) but it certainly seems some members like Quirky (And a few others who are pretty obvious) like to go hard on justifying everything Trump does. Am I missing the full picture? Perhaps. It's just what I noticed the odd time I catch up on what's being posted here, and I do enjoy a lot of the content as it's an easy place to catch up on some of the news.

I've asked these members several times if they are die-hard MAGA / Trump supporters and all I've gotten in return is insults, and no evidence to suggest otherwise. I would assume since no reply when asked has ever suggested otherwise, they indeed are.

You can't view their profiles, so it's not like you can check to see if they've ever had other views. It's just an observation, after all this is just an open chat. No disrespect intended - and if they are legitimately pro-MAGA pro-Trump Canadians, their opinion is respected. I'm just pointing out it sure feels like they are an echo chamber of the latest MAGA views, which I think is very fair point and fair response to their posts.

Alternatively, if I was some hard left LPC / Pro-JT echo chamber, I would say it would be pretty fair to call that out as well (Not that case).
Quirky is a serving CAF member. He’s said enough about himself that attaching a name to him would be super easy for a few members here if anyone cared to, but there’s no reason to. He has spoken at length on other subjects within his scope- fixing fighter jets, fighter jet stuff in general… There’s no need to fear he’s not an authentic CAF member, whatever one may think of his views as expressed on this site.
 
Let's fast forward to the part where you and the normal MAGA crowd go off on a rant about TDS, or whatever the latest MAGA insults are.

It's very interesting that there's no way to see your profile, probably because a short look at your posting history will show it's all just pro-Trump MAGA junk. It's almost like you have one purpose here.

There's a few accounts here who are either drinking the cool-aid hard (And may as well just admit it) or are legitimately here just to pump-up Trump.

So nothing on the topic at hand except typical insults and threats of doxing. Sounds like the army.ca of 10-20 years ago.
 
So nothing on the topic at hand except typical insults and threats of doxing. Sounds like the army.ca of 10-20 years ago.
You can relax, Quirky, absolutely nobody is threatening to dox you. I was reassuring the other gent that you’ve sufficiently established your bona fides as a legitimate CAF member.
 
You can relax, Quirky, absolutely nobody is threatening to dox you. I was reassuring the other gent that you’ve sufficiently established your bona fides as a legitimate CAF member.
Sure if that’s what you want to believe.
 
Very little info on circumstances yes but two people are reported shot by Customs and Border Protection and in hospitalin Portland. This is maybe an hour and an half ago as far as I can tell.

If this article is accurate it sounds like the CBP agent(s) who shot them may have them left the scene? One of the two gunshot victims apparently called it in himself.

Lots to wait and learn on this, and I expect lots of sketchy info. Also expect Portland to go full Portland.

 
Very little info on circumstances yes but two people are reported shot by Customs and Border Protection and in hospitalin Portland. This is maybe an hour and an half ago as far as I can tell.

If this article is accurate it sounds like the CBP agent(s) who shot them may have them left the scene? One of the two gunshot victims apparently called it in himself.

Lots to wait and learn on this, and I expect lots of sketchy info. Also expect Portland to go full Portland.


I am seeing it may be a husband and wife. Husband was hit in the arm, wife in the chest.

Not liking this pattern forming of Federal agents making themselves scarce after shots being fired.


 
I am seeing it may be a husband and wife. Husband was hit in the arm, wife in the chest.

Not liking this pattern forming of Federal agents making themselves scarce after shots being fired.


DHS’ first claims regarding this event:

IMG_8266.jpeg

I personally put no stock in DHS narratives anymore unless independently corroborated. Their own claims are no longer inherently reliable.
 
Can we narrow that to ICE? The USCG is sadly part of DHS, and they deserve no scorn thus far.
I’m talking about releases coming from DHS proper. Anything from them at this point, no. If USCG is making their own statement on something from their own people, I’m still willing to put stock in that.
 
Back
Top