- Reaction score
- 7,599
- Points
- 1,360

Every five years the RCMP sends me a letter basically telling me "Keep your PAL up to date and we won't seize your gun".The mother was apparently the owner of the known firearms at the residence. Her PAL was reported to have allegedly been expired. The question now is why were the firearms not seized for unlawful possession? That's simple. Peoples PALs, drivers licenses, health cards, gym memberships expire all the time and they don't realize it until the need arises for that document. The RCMP's Continuous Eligibility Screening would not have flagged it as expired without a triggering law enforcement interaction being entered in a contributing police information system.
So, if the legally acquired firearms may not have been involved at all, they were just at the residence? A bit of speculation on my part, but that does appear to be what this is saying.Ref in an RCMP FB statement to the second weapon in question having been modified:
View attachment 98452

I suspect the RCMP deflection is based on the disaster that was the Nova Scotia shooting.This is just my own bias but it seemed to me the RCMP put more emphasis on the firearms than needed. Whether it was a pistol, or rifle, talking about the rifle being modified (like, putting on a sling? foregrip?), and then emphasizing the firearms used weren't previously seized and returned by them. Sort of felt like they were rushed to point out this wasn't their fault.
Same thing happened to Asians during COVID-19 and to Muslims following any one of the recent Islamic involved terrorist attacks.The minute the news broke that the shooter in BC was transgender it was obviously to cause a lot of anti-trans rhetoric.
[If it would have been a straight white male shooting up a school that would have kicked off white males are violent! rhetoric.]
The RCMP have a narrative they must follow, same as Commissioner Lucki showed very publicly following the Nova Scotia incident. I'm sure Gary and Nathalie can't wait to find out what they get to ban next.This is just my own bias but it seemed to me the RCMP put more emphasis on the firearms than needed. Whether it was a pistol, or rifle, talking about the rifle being modified (like, putting on a sling? foregrip?), and then emphasizing the firearms used weren't previously seized and returned by them. Sort of felt like they were rushed to point out this wasn't their fault.
What do you think will happen to Open AI?Oh my this wont end well for open AI
Tough to gauge without some detail about the content…
Maybe some staff retraining.What do you think will happen to Open AI?
Maybe some staff retraining.
I'm not convinced the purveyors really care. Content review systems/teams or whatever they are called are likely mostly window dressing. Musk seems to be okay with AI creating child porn.Maybe some staff retraining.
It would have to be a seriously large settlement that withstands the appeals that we never hear about. Otherwise, it is just a cost of doing business.Or a change in policy. After a wicked lawsuit.
Open AI looks to be worth more than the GDP of Alberta.Or a change in policy. After a wicked lawsuit.
Unless you can find a crusading litigator to take it pro-bono. Not like that hasn't happened before.With our pay for play justice system I'm not sure a lawsuit would go far.