Active Shooter / Hostile Event ( ASHE ) prevention / response

[The Bread Guy]

Ref in an RCMP FB statement to the second weapon in question having been modified:

 

[OldSolduer]

The mother was apparently the owner of the known firearms at the residence. Her PAL was reported to have allegedly been expired. The question now is why were the firearms not seized for unlawful possession? That's simple. Peoples PALs, drivers licenses, health cards, gym memberships expire all the time and they don't realize it until the need arises for that document. The RCMP's Continuous Eligibility Screening would not have flagged it as expired without a triggering law enforcement interaction being entered in a contributing police information system.

Every five years the RCMP sends me a letter basically telling me "Keep your PAL up to date and we won't seize your gun".

 

[Kilted]

Ref in an RCMP FB statement to the second weapon in question having been modified:
View attachment 98452

So, if the legally acquired firearms may not have been involved at all, they were just at the residence? A bit of speculation on my part, but that does appear to be what this is saying.

 

[The Bread Guy]

For further context, here's RCMP BC's info-machine latest via FB (from which the earlier screen grabs I shared were extracted):