• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

All Things AB Separatism (split fm Liberal Minority Government 2025 - ???)

Maybe- but to play that card and be able to use the "in good faith" premise you need have atleast a plausible presentation of Asking -> Listening -> Evaluating > Deciding

Deciding -> Asking -> Pretending to Listen and Evaluate , doesn't cut it.

Hence MOU, hence actually engaging.

Pushing through unreasonableness has to wait for the unreasonableness to be presented and be shown immovable by other means
You're straw manning this by saying "pretend" to consult.

I am saying there are limits to what consultation is, and regardless of the outcome it doesn't stop the project.

Tell me, is the economic well being of Canada and it's provinces of particular urgent national interest given the current climate with our largest trading partner? "Team Canada"?

But PMMC already deep sixed this. He stated for the MOU to go ahead, BC and the FN must consent. PMMC added that stipulation when it's not constitutionally required. He gave the opponents the veto. BC and the FN have already stated they will not consent. The MOU is dead. Confederation is failing. This how not-insignificant separatist movements get momentum.
 
You're straw manning this by saying "pretend" to consult.

I am saying there are limits to what consultation is, and regardless of the outcome it doesn't stop the project.

Tell me, is the economic well being of Canada and it's provinces of particular urgent national interest given the current climate with our largest trading partner? "Team Canada"?

But PMMC already deep sixed this. He stated for the MOU to go ahead, BC and the FN must consent. PMMC added that stipulation when it's not constitutionally required. He gave the opponents the veto. BC and the FN have already stated they will not consent. The MOU is dead. Confederation is failing. This how not-insignificant separatist movements get momentum.

Your understanding of what "duty to consult" means and entails is far different from what is reality.


 
Is it your position that duty to consult means that if all demands are not met to the satisfaction of the griever the griever can veto the matter?
 
Back
Top