• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

All Things AB Separatism (split fm Liberal Minority Government 2025 - ???)

Many outbreaks appear to be centred around religious communities like the Mennonite and Amish. It was the cause in Texas and Ontario. As well, I believe many immigrants, legal and illegal, aren’t vaccinated or screened when they enter the country.
Wow, that roughly 0.5% of Alberta's population has had quite a medical impact.
 
We could, if we chose, require proof of vaccination as a border control for any non-citizens or to be eligible for any period of work or study.

Generally, we treat everyone equally (no wonder others have this impression of Canadians being nice). If a citizen/PR is not required to show proof of vaccination to enter the country, then newcomers who cross the border with the intent to remain (hopefully in a legal status) would be in the same boat as everyone else, having to abide by the vaccination policies of the province in which they reside. Canada (the federal entity), while making recommendations about vaccines, does not implement vaccine programs, that's a provincial responsibility. They set both the schedule (not sure if there are any provinces that have any mandatory ones) as well as provide the vaccines (without additional cost). There are differences among the provinces on what they require/provide. Obviously, since we are discussing this in a thread about Alberta.

To add to the discussion, try this link to a study about why (and why not) immigrants are, or are not, vaccinated prior to coming to Canada and some of the factors that contribute to their participation in vaccination programs once here.


Since one of the cohorts that the study looked at were Nigerian immigrants, it amused me since my GP is Nigerian (a prince of a fellow). I was in to see him a couple of weeks ago for my annual and in his usual thorough manner reviewed my vaccinations.
 
Generally, we treat everyone equally (no wonder others have this impression of Canadians being nice). If a citizen/PR is not required to show proof of vaccination to enter the country, then newcomers who cross the border with the intent to remain (hopefully in a legal status) would be in the same boat as everyone else, having to abide by the vaccination policies of the province in which they reside. Canada (the federal entity), while making recommendations about vaccines, does not implement vaccine programs, that's a provincial responsibility. They set both the schedule (not sure if there are any provinces that have any mandatory ones) as well as provide the vaccines (without additional cost). There are differences among the provinces on what they require/provide. Obviously, since we are discussing this in a thread about Alberta.

To add to the discussion, try this link to a study about why (and why not) immigrants are, or are not, vaccinated prior to coming to Canada and some of the factors that contribute to their participation in vaccination programs once here.


Since one of the cohorts that the study looked at were Nigerian immigrants, it amused me since my GP is Nigerian (a prince of a fellow). I was in to see him a couple of weeks ago for my annual and in his usual thorough manner reviewed my vaccinations.
Sure, but it’s absolutely fair game to apply public health criteria to entry controls for those who don’t have an inherent right to enter the country. Having or promptly getting the full course of normal vaccines is a reasonable requirement for those looking to immigrate or temporarily study/work.
 
So turns out 7 of 11 members of the Alberta next panel all are major UCP donors. Talk about stacking the deck, on top of that UCP members have been getting advanced tickets to the town halls. Seems like a echo chamber mostly, that said I've heard some critical voices have popped up in Edmonton and other areas.
 
So turns out 7 of 11 members of the Alberta next panel all are major UCP donors. Talk about stacking the deck, on top of that UCP members have been getting advanced tickets to the town halls. Seems like a echo chamber mostly, that said I've heard some critical voices have popped up in Edmonton and other areas.

You were expecting something different? Like . . . impartiality ?
 
You were expecting something different? Like . . . impartiality ?
Honestly, from the government? No, I find it hilarious she thinks she can run a police force and a pension plan when she can't even run an ambulance service, schools, or social services.
 
So turns out 7 of 11 members of the Alberta next panel all are major UCP donors. Talk about stacking the deck, on top of that UCP members have been getting advanced tickets to the town halls. Seems like a echo chamber mostly, that said I've heard some critical voices have popped up in Edmonton and other areas.
To be scrupulously fair, partisan packing of committees is hardly a UCP-only thing. STILL bad optics, but ....

More on brand for this gov

Alberta Premier Smith demands apology from fire-stricken town of Jasper

Seems Club Fed (involved because of the national park area involved) may have also been less than satisfied with the 2024 effort, it seems ;)

Jasper's report attached.
 

Attachments

No mention of the special interests that kiboshed Parks Canada’s ability to reduce fuels?

As I’ve written about before, the tourism industry and some locals have fought Parks Canada anytime they wanted to modestly manage forest fuels in the mountain parks. They light their hair on fire at any prospect of additional smoke in the valley or scarring of the landscape and the effects that may have had on tourism. As a result, the Parks Canada head-shed would get gun-shy about proposing more comprehensive fuel management schemes. Then when the devastating fire happens that Parks Canada tried warning everyone about happens, everyone points their fingers at Parks Canada demanding to know why they didn’t do anything.
 
Back
Top