• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

All Things First Nations - CF help, protests, solutions, residential schools, etc. (merged)

YZT580 said:
... There is no excuse for people to not have good water with 20 million a year to spend.  Someone is making large deposits towards their retirement fund IMHO>

Well, Trudeau did make it easier for that to happen.  What a good idea!  ::)

https://nationalpost.com/news/politics/first-nations-fiscal-accountability-dropped-after-liberals-cut-enforcement-measure-at-end-of-2015
 
YZT580 said:
When Maggie started divesting HM government of council flats she did so by giving ownership to long-term residents.  People swore that the neighbourhoods would descend into anarchy.  They were wrong.  People do take pride in ownership.  Give a kid his first car and he'll drive it into the ground or run it dry of oil like as not.  When he has to pay for it, he'll be out there on sundays polishing it.  As for the water problem, I can buy an RO system capable of purifying the water for less than 800 dollars and install it within a couple of hours.  Filters are 120 a year.  There is no excuse for people to not have good water with 20 million a year to spend.  Someone is making large deposits towards their retirement fund IMHO>

From what I read, the issue is the lake they are drawing it from isn't suitable for the size of the town, really isn't clean. A long term solution is to run the collection out the the river (see https://www.cbc.ca/news/indigenous/attawapiskat-water-quality-emergency-1.5204652).  Sounds like they also have issues with the sewage system being undersized, so it's the entire infrastructure from start to finish.

Giving them ownership of an undersized system that sounds like it was kludged in and not suited for purpose isn't really a fix. You need a proper water source with a sufficiently sized collection treatment system and the safe distribution system. Doesn't sound like they have any of those, nor the expertise to design, build, or operate one. This is the culmination of decades of neglect and piecemeal fixes, and what happens when you spend decades bandaiding things.

n RO system is just a microfilter so doesn't actually purify anything. UV systems are good, but you normally use chlorine or something else to make sure there is no contamination in the distribution end (but in lower levels). Some of the other reserves are drawing from water sources that have been massively contaminated by industrial pollution (approved by the Fed govt of the past) that needs special treatment, so it's a complicated issue and you need bespoke solutions tailored to the site and population.

Long term they need to give them the tools to be self sufficient, but the water and housing crises are going to cost billions to sort out after being left to fall apart for so long.  Think this would be a good opportunity for some of the successful bands to start pooling together their expertise (and maybe start some companies to be able to compete for the contracts).  There is enough work you could train and employ a whole generation on working on basic infrastructure projects on the reserves.  There is a lot of distrust in the fed govt (justified and understandable IMHO), so these kind of initiatives may be more successful.  There is something similar for the fire services, but it's ad hoc and limited by the very small resources they have access to to do outreach to other communities.
 
I may be being naive, but if DART can airlift, assemble and have a 60,000 litre potable water system in use within a day or two this really should not be a serious problem, even if the system is only temporary while a more permanent fix is installed.
 
Colin P said:
UV water purifiers work with solar systems, that's what I am putting in my cabin. Still needs filters to strain organic material out.

UV sterilizes water, not purifies it. The problem with UV is that it's effectiveness degrades over time as lamp intensity drops and bio slime builds up on the quartz sleeve. UV is a barrier kill, not an all system kill. Any failure of the lamp contaminates everything downstream from the lamp. If I were drawing from a surface water source, I'd be looking at chlorine injection with a carbon filter farther downstream to neutralize it after it's done it's job.
 
YZT580 said:
I may be being naive, but if DART can airlift, assemble and have a 60,000 litre potable water system in use within a day or two this really should not be a serious problem, even if the system is only temporary while a more permanent fix is installed.

How far does that 60,000 litres of water go?

To quote from a report about water useage at FOBs, the WHO considers 50 litres per person per day the "minimum" sustainment requirement (that to keep someone alive and healthy) in the "developing world" (those places described by someone as "******* countries").
World Health Organization
The World Health Organization (WHO) has also developed planning factors for water use. The availability of clean potable water is a major concern in the developing world, and WHO has dedicated much effort to determining minimal sustainment requirements. WHO guidelines consider many options, and the availability of water weighs heavily on the usage. However, they recommend 50 liters per capita-day (13.2 gpcd) as a basic human right (Gleick 1996). This would meet the minimal needs of sustainment based on their analysis. This is very close to 13 gpcd as recommended by CASCOM.

So if we take that 50 litres as an acceptable goal for the residents of a reserve to meet the standard of someone living in a mud and grass hut then that ROWPU would have to pump out 77,500 litres of potable water to meet the needs of the 1550 persons living on the Attawapiskat First Nation.  But there are limitations on what that 77,500 litres would provide.  If we would like them to have the luxurious standards that someone (say like a soldier on ops in a FOB) in a more advantageous situation receives, then the 13.2 gallons (US measure) would have to be increased to approx. 34 gallons (the figure the US Army uses for planning purposes) so that one could get a shower twice a week and have a small load of laundry done once a week; of course sanitation needs would have to be centralized latrines,  and food preparation and hygiene (showers, laundry, etc) would also need to be centralized.
 
Which is why I said a temporary fix.  77,000 litres is easily covered by 60,000 times 2.  Beats boiling and in the long run is cheaper than airlift.  You need to think of the requirement in the same manner as if you were responding to a disaster.  First requirement of any group is clean water, the rest comes later.
 
Target Up said:
UV sterilizes water, not purifies it. The problem with UV is that it's effectiveness degrades over time as lamp intensity drops and bio slime builds up on the quartz sleeve. UV is a barrier kill, not an all system kill. Any failure of the lamp contaminates everything downstream from the lamp. If I were drawing from a surface water source, I'd be looking at chlorine injection with a carbon filter farther downstream to neutralize it after it's done it's job.

Running on solar with a gravity fed system in a cabin limits options. The nice thing about a filtered and UV system is you can fly the stuff in, train the locals to look after it and let them take some responsibility for it.

I shook my head at one BC Reserve, they complained they had no fire department. Yet I knew they were getting significant funds for the Oil and Gas companies to buy equipment. So I suggested setting up a volunteer one, they gave me the evil eye. The Oil and Gas companies would have fallen over themselves to help equip such a department, even if it starts small with a couple of large pickup trucks. Sadly what is missing in many reserves is a desire to help themselves. That is changing, but a lot slower than it should. 
 
Maybe instead of traipsing around the world he should be home dealing with what's happening out west. Something prime ministerial perhaps?
 
MilEME09 said:
And now our glorious leader has stated he will not step in, in any way with current wave of protests against the coastal gas link pipeline. So much for national leadership, guess the rule of law dies in our country.
many leaders are not wanting to touch this.

In Ontario this is the job for the OPP,  and they aren't moving.
 
Altair said:
In Ontario this is the job for the OPP,  and they aren't moving.

According to Metro Toronto Police, there was a blockade at Yonge and Dundas during the evening commute.

https://twitter.com/TPSOperations/status/1228458948384169984?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw

- information that demo is regarding 'Solidarity w. Wet'suwet'en'
- group is going to protest at the intersection of Yonge/Dundas



 
Altair said:
many leaders are not wanting to touch this.

In Ontario this is the job for the OPP,  and they aren't moving.
Might be all the bonfires the protestors are starting then claiming they're sacred fires. OPP probably doesn't want to deal with destroying a religious and cultural symbol on camera.  Pretty clever of the protestors when you think of it.
 
Are railways not the jurisdiction of the CP Police and RCMP as they're federal? OPP would be responsible for highway blockades.
 
milnews.ca said:
I haven't seen media ask him or the Premier why the OPP haven't gone in yet, but even with a Team Blue government, I suspect Ontario & the OPP may be thinking carefully given previous events.

National Post

14 Feb., 2020

This is Doug Ford's Caledonia moment
https://nationalpost.com/opinion/matt-gurney-doug-fords-caledonia-moment

This is Ford's Caledonia moment. The country is watching to see how he does.
 
PuckChaser said:
Are railways not the jurisdiction of the CP Police and RCMP as they're federal? OPP would be responsible for highway blockades.

I have been asking the same question.  CN and CP Railway Police have jurisdiction within 500m of railroad property, so why aren't the railway police taking the lead on this with significant OPP support?

What's CN's angle in all of this?  My take is CN doesn't want a pipeline built as that will take away business from their railroad.
 
Humphrey Bogart said:
I have been asking the same question.  CN and CP Railway Police have jurisdiction within 500m of railroad property, so why aren't the railway police taking the lead on this with significant OPP support?

What's CN's angle in all of this?  My take is CN doesn't want a pipeline built as that will take away business from their railroad.

You may be on to something. 

CN police threatened to arrest a journalist for trespassing while letting protesters stay there, weird world.

https://www.thepostmillennial.com/watch-police-officer-threatens-to-arrest-journalist-covering-anti-pipeline-blockade/

But I doubt CN is happy about losing the amount of money they are losing daily because of these protests.
 
Remius said:
But I doubt CN is happy about losing the amount of money they are losing daily because of these protests.

Probably not. Considering how quickly they settled the 8-day strike in late November last year.

CNR Strike 2019 
https://navy.ca/forums/threads/131528.0
2 pages.

 
Ahh... if only the ghost of Sir Percy Girouard was around.

(Google him;  I'll wait.  He did OK running railroads... for an RMC guy  ;D )
 
Journeyman said:
Ahh... if only the ghost of Sir Percy Girouard was around.

(Google him;  I'll wait.  He did OK running railroads... for an RMC guy  ;D )

An amazing Canadian,
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Percy_Girouard
 
Back
Top