- Reaction score
- 11,638
- Points
- 1,160
The First Nations, Quebecois nation, Canadian nation presents all sorts of interesting possibilities that are now starting to exercise Duceppe and Phil Fontaine.
Joe Clark proposed a community of communities.
Pierre Trudeau proposed a nation of cultures
Stephen Harper has proposed a nation of nations of which the Quebecois are one
In response to the latest gambit Gordon Campbell proposes recognizing a nation of First Nations within the nation of Canada. At this point everyone gets cheerfully confused.
Gilles wanted Quebec to be equal to Canada. He has accepted the premise that Quebecois are a subset of Canada (however the Quebecois choose to identify themselves)
Phil wanted the First Nations to be recognized as equal to the Quebecois meaning that there was the risk of ultimately equalling Canada. Now that the risk is gone he still wants "First Nation" to equal Quebecois. What wasn't clear is whether each nation plus the Inuit and Metis (white folks with some Native blood or Natives with white blood) is an individual nation or a collective nation.
Along comes Gordon who says we really should recognize each of the First Nations as nations within the nation of First Nations within the nation of Canada. Phil says hold on ...... does that give me more power or less?
And ultimately that is what this is all about. Gilles and Phil want more power. They used the word nation as a club to get it. This was possible because "nation" could be construed as having a precise meaning.
Now, in Canada, in common usage, nation can be a tribe, clan, religion (Israel and Islam are both nations), country, like-minded individuals..........by obfuscation the value of the word as a propoganda tool is degraded.
Likewise with Quebecois. It now means whatever the speaker and hearer want it to mean. In that sense a lack of clarity is a good thing.
Where clarity is necessary is to make the people currently living within the boundaries administered by the government in Ottawa realize that by treaty, common usage and force of arms those borders are unchangeable.
Joe Clark proposed a community of communities.
Pierre Trudeau proposed a nation of cultures
Stephen Harper has proposed a nation of nations of which the Quebecois are one
In response to the latest gambit Gordon Campbell proposes recognizing a nation of First Nations within the nation of Canada. At this point everyone gets cheerfully confused.
Gilles wanted Quebec to be equal to Canada. He has accepted the premise that Quebecois are a subset of Canada (however the Quebecois choose to identify themselves)
Phil wanted the First Nations to be recognized as equal to the Quebecois meaning that there was the risk of ultimately equalling Canada. Now that the risk is gone he still wants "First Nation" to equal Quebecois. What wasn't clear is whether each nation plus the Inuit and Metis (white folks with some Native blood or Natives with white blood) is an individual nation or a collective nation.
Along comes Gordon who says we really should recognize each of the First Nations as nations within the nation of First Nations within the nation of Canada. Phil says hold on ...... does that give me more power or less?
And ultimately that is what this is all about. Gilles and Phil want more power. They used the word nation as a club to get it. This was possible because "nation" could be construed as having a precise meaning.
Now, in Canada, in common usage, nation can be a tribe, clan, religion (Israel and Islam are both nations), country, like-minded individuals..........by obfuscation the value of the word as a propoganda tool is degraded.
Likewise with Quebecois. It now means whatever the speaker and hearer want it to mean. In that sense a lack of clarity is a good thing.
Where clarity is necessary is to make the people currently living within the boundaries administered by the government in Ottawa realize that by treaty, common usage and force of arms those borders are unchangeable.
