- Reaction score
- 1
- Points
- 430
I have to agree with Wes also.
Rebel_RN said:Continued ignorance breeds continued problems
Britney Spears said:Well, to be fair, high schoolers/teenagers are one step below pondscum in EVERY civilized country, so that's pretty much par for the course.
I think it's great that they were invited. What I find utterly nauseating is the fact that Immigrations allows the different cultures to come to Canada and create a mini-where ever they were from in the first place.
I have no problems with someone remembering where they came from but it seems to me that once on Canadian soil they ( not all mind you ) tend to forget why they left. When emigrating to a western culture there are some western ideals that I feel should be imposed. maybe I'm way out in left field here but I don't want centuries old drama, issues, problems,and fighting being readily flaunted in my face or felt as though i am inconsiderate
Rebel_RN said:I don't believe that my view is ignorant in the least. I believe that there is a reason for emmigration and have no problems with that, as I stated earlier I have a big problem with re-hashing all of the centuries old issues once on Canadian soil, or trying to make Canada feel bad for inviting a particular group to Cold Lake. If they don't approve, TOUGH.
Acorn said:"Centuries old issues" will be "re-hashed" on Canadian soil no matter how much you'd like to prevent it: Aboriginal issues, Anglo-Franco issues, name it. The FACT is we have relatively free speech here in Canada, and if YOU don't like that there are many places you can go to (emigrate from Canada). So long as they don't cross the line of protesting violently or incitement to violence I invite immigrants to use their presence in Canada to benefit from the freedom that brought them here in the first place. Like it or not, the Arabs who call themselves Palestinians have a beef with Israel. Sure, their some of anger might be better directed towards their Arab neighbours (for various reasons, that you must know since you aren't ignorant of the conflict), but currently they are occupied by Israel, not Jordan, Egypt or Syria. What do you expect?
Acorn
Infanteer said:Moreover, I believe that cultural conceptions of war determine our social outlook on "styles" of fighting. Look at the way suicide bombers are treated in the society from which the came from; they are celebrated as heros. The cultural mechanism that supports this is the enormously strong undertow of Islam; of which many of its interpretations define suicide bombing as martyrdom and entry to heaven. They are looked upon as true "warriors" of their society.
This isn't unique to Islamic cultures and sub-cultures either; just look at the Japanese Kamikaze of WWII and the ceremonial significance of their sacrifice.
Now take the laser-guided bomber. Look at the social and historical aspects of this form of fighting. Highly technological and sometimes indiscriminate. Bravery, skills to return alive, "Knights of the Air" dogfighting, Memphis Belle, the dashing aviator. These are all cultural mechanisms surrounding the form of Air War we've developed. As such, vaporizing a Hezbollah leader with a laser-guided bomb or firebombing a city may seem "cowardly" to an enemy with a culture that does not have the mechanisms to process that type of violence. Just as you won't see Western societies have icons such as manuals on suicide bombings, pictures of babies with explosive belts, and rewards for the families of martyrs; you won't see Islamic societies developing icons like Douhet, the Enola Gay, and Top Gun.
You could apply this throughout history. I bet you the Aztec's thought the Spanish cowardly for fighting from horses, engaging in ranged combat with rifles, and trying to kill instead of capture for sacrifice.
Is it relative? Sure. There is no spectrum of "effective", "just", or "better" ways of fighting. The violence we chose to wreck upon ourselves as humans is totally dependent on factors in the time and space we occupy. We simply fight the way we know best. The fact that it is what we know best doesn't make it more superior or moral then other forms. However, simply trying to graft on aspects of how others fight into our unique paradigm of warfighting may have unintended consequences. Consider it akin to introducing some new, violent species into a closed ecosystem; the consequences are often dramatic.
larry Strong said:To imply that Cadets are along the same lines as suicide bombers is ridiculous.
larry Strong said:To equate dressing up your children in a fashion that represents, a segment of society that condones going out and indiscriminatly blowing up what ever they can find, to a youth group that tries to teach responsibility and self discipline borders on the inane if not totaly incredulous.