- Reaction score
- 18,068
- Points
- 1,160
No I'm not. I'll say it again. This is for mandatory unit collective training for post DP1 personnel.My point is that your 45.5 day calendar under estimates the training opportunity.
It's a balance of what you can realistically sustain as something you can force people to attend and their competing family and civilian work commitments.
Just like you I know that a year has 365 days and that you can make use of a lot more of those but those are for people who volunteer to take additional training. What is plain stupid is to set up one hundred days of training and then get all bitchy when over 80% of them don't show up.
Talk to the army. They created the ARE. That said, I've interviewed a few ARes arty COs on this very issue and they prefer unit training. Many see the CBG battle schools as black holes that suck up their qualified NCOs and give them back very little in the way of new troops.Also, leaving training in the hands of 200 discrete sections of 11 (one per unit) seems to be at best inefficient and also likely to produce highly variable results.
Yup. I agree course programs should come with centrally prepared lesson plans. At worst, last year's course materials should be available. Frequently they aren't. Go figure. Individual and collective training should generally be separate. And then there was the whole TQ4 OJT program some genius created in the 1970s.Especially if those 11 are expected to prepare their own lesson plans and schedules and source training areas and materials while managing individual training for people of at least two skill levels (eg year 1 and year 2) as well as organizing collective training for each of the various arms.
No idea.Does CADTC provide one single text/workbook that the new entry can work through and to which the instructors can supervise and teach?
Considering the prevalence of electronic systems available throughout the army you would think the whole thing would be simple, wouldn't you? My guess is that a lot of this material is already at CTC. If someone would go to organizing a system for collecting, collating and publish this.I remember being given a bunch of pams and being told there were many more in the system. I was then taught Methods of Instruction and how to build a lesson plan and told to carry on. The unit instructors got the same instruction and support.
And the RSS consisted of a Capt and WO. The WO's vocabulary often seemed to collapse to "DILLIGAS, Sir!"
It would be nice to think that CADTC had got round to creating standard courses that worked within the bounds of the Class A schedule.

