Army Reserve Restructuring

[markppcli]

Youre overreacting a bit Kevin. What kind of security do you expect a light coy to need that they dont already have? There are lockups, ORs, coy offices, classrooms, gyms, messes, quarters, etc. Depot whatever vehicles they get (LFE, etc) at the closest training base and what else do they need?

A crypto vault, a CSNI hook up, a proper gym, and a ratio of class rooms to bars that exceeds 1:3.

 

[Brad Sallows]

If new defence facilities are on the table, they could be more than just one-company armouries. Against that, too much "hey, this might be useful too" feature creep could bloat the costs beyond all reasonable limits.

 

[PrairieFella]

A crypto vault

I wont pretend to know what is required for a crypto vault but if we can have crypto vaults on what are essentially open bases with cheap curtain wall (non-load bearing wall material, most metal-framed buildings) construction, I think we can manage that in two-three foot thick brick walls that are behind locked chain linked fences with MPs a building and/or vault alarm buzz away. I can think of crypto vaults at armouries Ive seen. If local infrastructure cant handle that, keep it at the local training establishment. Not that Ive ever seen a TKL or like device go out on a reserve ex, but thats a different issue.

a CSNI hook up,

Fair. I wont pretend to know what sort of data infrastructure is required for that. I know a bunch of armouries just had their drops upgraded, but Im not an IS Tech or a Sig Tech.

a proper gym

Support bases if nearby, if not - thats a unit/garrison command team problem, not a building one. We have a functional gym across two areas in our garrison.

and a ratio of class rooms to bars that exceeds 1:3.

Another local leadership problem.

 

[markppcli]

I wont pretend to know what is required for a crypto vault but if we can have crypto vaults on what are essentially open bases with cheap curtain wall (non-load bearing wall material, most metal-framed buildings) construction, I think we can manage that in two-three foot thick brick walls that are behind locked chain linked fences with MPs a building and/or vault alarm buzz away. I can think of crypto vaults at armouries Ive seen. If local infrastructure cant handle that, keep it at the local training establishment.

Whats the response time for MPs to Thunderbay, St Johns, or Prince George? The "local training establishment" in Vancouver is Wainwright, for Newfoundland is likely Aldershot or Gagetown. Not getting guys able to use a radio like that.

Fair. I wont pretend to know what sort of data infrastructure is required for that. I know a bunch of armouries just had their drops upgraded, but Im not an IS Tech or a Sig Tech.

Support bases if nearby, if not - thats a unit/garrison command team problem, not a building one. We have a functional gym across two areas in our garrison.

Another local leadership problem.

A gym is absolutely a building construction problem. That should be dedicated space, and requires infrastructure. A squat rack and a treadmill in the corner doesnt cut it for a serious military.

Same with class rooms. "Local leadership" doesnt turn a JRs into a modern class room with a projector, desks, and dwan hook ups.

Simply put these buildings are built to teach rifle drill to 100 people on a thursday followed by socializing. The militia that built them in 1900 was as much a service club as anytbing else. The moder. Requirments are much different and what we have isnt fit for purpose.

 

[PrairieFella]

Whats the response time for MPs to Thunderbay, St Johns, or Prince George?

What is requirement to keep one there as opposed to keeping crypto assets at their local support base? How does a new building for the Royal Newfoundland Regiment change those response times?

Same with class rooms. "Local leadership" doesnt turn a JRs into a modern class room with a projector, desks, and dwan hook ups.

Local leadership absolutely has a say. In my neck of the woods a room is getting gutted, over a dozen of drops added and a networked sim centre is being established. It just takes some actual effort of the part of the local commanders who are willing to do some staff work.

Simply put these buildings are built to teach rifle drill to 100 people on a thursday followed by socializing. The militia that built them in 1900 was as much a service club as anytbing else. The moder. Requirments are much different and what we have isnt fit for purpose.

Youre not wrong. Im not saying we dont need new infrastructure. Im saying (upthread) Id rather see it directed where its really needed first, CSS and CS. The Timbuktu Light Rifles can have an old stone armoury get some retrofits and be reasonably adequate for what they need. The same cant be for XX Service Bn, who will need a massive build-out to meet the new requirements from CAMO. There are limited MO infra bucks, Id rather see 90% go to the supporters who cannot support, rather than to the operators who can still reasonably operate.

 

[markppcli]

What is requirement to keep one there as opposed to keeping crypto assets at their local support base? How does a new building for the Royal Newfoundland Regiment change those response times?

Distance to a support base can be a full days drive. Do you expect people to be trained on equipme they can't access?

My comment about the MPs was more in response to "an alarm away," which i took as a dismissal of security concerns. We need purpose built crypto storage.

Local leadership absolutely has a say. In my neck of the woods a room is getting gutted, over a dozen of drops added and a networked sim centre is being established. It just takes some actual effort of the part of the local commanders who are willing to do some staff work.

And I can tell you an example of that not working. That it works in your armoury doesnt mean that its going to work in others. My old unit for example the JRs could never be repurposed and there simply arent extra rooms built. So yes there needs to be a lot of money spent on the existing armouries to make them usable.

Youre not wrong. Im not saying we dont need new infrastructure. Im saying (upthread) Id rather see it directed where its really needed first, CSS and CS. The Timbuktu Light Rifles can have an old stone armoury get some retrofits and be reasonably adequate for what they need. The same cant be for XX Service Bn, who will need a massive build-out to meet the new requirements from CAMO. There are limited MO infra bucks, Id rather see 90% go to the supporters who cannot support, rather than to the operators who can still reasonably operate.

While I share your concern about reserve maintenance facilities thats a bridge to cross once we figure out how to actually attract reservist maintainers. Id be happy with, where distance permits, those guys fall in on existing base infrastructure as the night shift.

 

[Ludoc]

We have reached a generational shift where there is a lot of money in the system. So much so, that many of us that have been in for a while can't really wrap our head around it. We have been cultured to do with less and do without for so long that it is our default. We need to open our eyes and realize that isn't the case anymore.

Keeping Reserve units (and Reg force units on some bases) in shitty falling apart buildings that are not fit for purpose isn't acceptable. We did so for so long because we did not have a choice. Now that we do have a choice why constrain ourselves? We will be stuck with ever solution we push for the next 50 plus years. Instead of "upgrading" old armouries or trying to shoe horn units into converted civilian buildings and accepting the compromises that existing infrastructure would force on us, would it not make more sense to design and build what we need? Not just what we need now, but what we think we will need for the next generation of soldier.

It is super expensive to retrofit crypto vaults and CSNI into buildings that aren't designed to have them. Both are going to be necessary. There are a lot of dumb reasons that the Res Force doesn't have dismounted radios, the Army has failed you. One of those reasons is you can't store them properly. When the mounted radios get replaced, you will have the same problem. If we build you new buildings we can put all the necessary stuff in them from day one, it is a lot cheaper to add those things to the design rather than try to retrofit them later.

What we should be doing is designing a standard armoury. What does every unit need (classrooms/weapons vault/OR/storage cages/mess/etc)? Pay to design that building once (or at least design it with "building blocks" so it can scale from one unit to multiple units). Then have the other half of the building specialized for the unit type (Armoured units get a giant room with power/networks for vehicle sims/Infantry get a premade kill house/Svc Bn get a big tool crib and floor space with over head cranes/etc). The amount of money we would save on engineering studies to retrofit a bunch of old, crumbling, buildings would not pay for itself but would go a long way.

 

[PrairieFella]

We have reached a generational shift where there is a lot of money in the system. So much so, that many of us that have been in for a while can't really wrap our head around it. We have been cultured to do with less and do without for so long that it is our default. We need to open our eyes and realize that isn't the case anymore.

Keeping Reserve units (and Reg force units on some bases) in shitty falling apart buildings that are not fit for purpose isn't acceptable. We did so for so long because we did not have a choice. Now that we do have a choice why constrain ourselves? We will be stuck with ever solution we push for the next 50 plus years. Instead of "upgrading" old armouries or trying to shoe horn units into converted civilian buildings and accepting the compromises that existing infrastructure would force on us, would it not make more sense to design and build what we need? Not just what we need now, but what we think we will need for the next generation of soldier.

It is super expensive to retrofit crypto vaults and CSNI into buildings that aren't designed to have them. Both are going to be necessary. There are a lot of dumb reasons that the Res Force doesn't have dismounted radios, the Army has failed you. One of those reasons is you can't store them properly. When the mounted radios get replaced, you will have the same problem. If we build you new buildings we can put all the necessary stuff in them from day one, it is a lot cheaper to add those things to the design rather than try to retrofit them later.

What we should be doing is designing a standard armoury. What does every unit need (classrooms/weapons vault/OR/storage cages/mess/etc)? Pay to design that building once (or at least design it with "building blocks" so it can scale from one unit to multiple units). Then have the other half of the building specialized for the unit type (Armoured units get a giant room with power/networks for vehicle sims/Infantry get a premade kill house/Svc Bn get a big tool crib and floor space with over head cranes/etc). The amount of money we would save on engineering studies to retrofit a bunch of old, crumbling, buildings would not pay for itself but would go a long way.

I just dont see it happening. This sort of buildout needs to come from the top and its obvious 2 Div is de-prioritized. I hope Im just being cynical but in the meantime Ill expect to continue to operate in our 120ish year old building.

 

[Gordon Dundas/]

I just dont see it happening. This sort of buildout needs to come from the top and its obvious 2 Div is de-prioritized. I hope Im just being cynical but in the meantime Ill expect to continue to operate in our 120ish year old building.

Quit whining, don't you know black mold builds character.

 

[daftandbarmy]

I just dont see it happening. This sort of buildout needs to come from the top and its obvious 2 Div is de-prioritized. I hope Im just being cynical but in the meantime Ill expect to continue to operate in our 120ish year old building.

But wait, there is method in the madness. Viz:

Bay Street Armoury (home of the CScotR and 5 Fd Regt RA) vs. Wilkinson Rd. Correctional Centre (a local provincial lockup).

Coincidence? I think not.

 

[KevinB]

I just dont see it happening. This sort of buildout needs to come from the top and its obvious 2 Div is de-prioritized. I hope Im just being cynical but in the meantime Ill expect to continue to operate in our 120ish year old building.

Not sure what data center building rates are near you - but that type of building and footprint is about ideal for a smaller sized unit.

Exterior perimeter fencing, with secure gates entry. External Camera coverage, and secure building access control.
Stand off from the street and parking for POMV. As well could be a fairly non descript building should the CAF want to keep a lower profile in some areas.

One could have multiple floors, as well as oversized roller doors to facilitate indoor vehicle storage (mind you I believe in PRes Armored Vehicles being at a central regional training facility). But LUVW, ISV, MSV type vehicles should be able to be stored locally.

Sub unit QM facilities should have access control, and there are some good ways to be able to lockup equipment (STANO/VAS, COMMS, Wpns’s and other controlled items that do not take a lot of floor space.

The key is to determine what size of unit one wants to house in the facility, and also how to scale the setup, and what level of modularity is desired/required.
@ytz had posted some concepts in another thread. I think his concept has an exceptional amount of merit.


I also believe that this sort of expenditure is an easy no brainer for the current government.