• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

British Military Current Events

Not much PT in the First World War I bet.
A lot of the soldiers that enlisted in WW 1 were farmers, ranchers, laborers etc. No need for PT - farming itself was PT.

Marksmanship training was probably easier - most would have known how to shoot.

There was always a need for PT.


It just didn't look the same back then.

While an emphasis on physical fitness in the military has increased, the old ways of doing things may be better.

And as surprising as it may seem, the RCAF (original flavour) was once a world leader in fitness training.

 
There was always a need for PT.


It just didn't look the same back then.

While an emphasis on physical fitness in the military has increased, the old ways of doing things may be better.

And as surprising as it may seem, the RCAF (original flavour) was once a world leader in fitness training.

I hem and haw about starting 5BX every so often.
 
Join the Army, make paper airplanes, pass the egg ... ;)




 
As a complete aside, did they not have a shirt (jacket?) anywhere near her size? She seems like she’s swimming in it.

Not to mention the breast pockets that can probably hold a ruck’s worth of stuff.
 
As a complete aside, did they not have a shirt (jacket?) anywhere near her size? She seems like she’s swimming in it.

Not to mention the breast pockets that can probably hold a ruck’s worth of stuff.

Dude... do you even PARA smock? ;)

1737151547111.png

Parachutist’s Oversmock

December 2, 2018 / Leave a comment
In an earlier article, I wrote about the development of the famous Denison smock, as worn by the British Airborne Forces. However, the Denison was only half of a two-part system. The other component was the parachutist’s oversmock.

During the early days of the Airborne Forces, the uniforms and equipment were experimental. The Royal Air Force naturally had an inventory of parachutes for escaping damaged aircraft, and the first paratroopers had to manually pull a ripcord to deploy their canopy. It was not long before this method was determined unsuitable, and a static-line parachute was developed. The volunteer paratroopers during those early days were certainly brave, as there were a number of injuries and even fatalities; each incident was thoroughly investigated and often resulted in a modification to the equipment or the training program. The X-type static line parachute, also called the “Statichute”, eventually developed an impressive reputation for reliability. However, there was still the occasional mishap, including incidents of the parachute canopy not fully opening and deploying; this dreadful situation was known as the “Roman candle”.

To reduce the number of accidents, it was considered vital to prevent any entanglements between the paratrooper, his equipment, and the parachute. In 1942, the Denison smock and the parachutist’s oversmock were both adopted and entered production; together, these items replaced the earlier “step-in smock”. The Denison was worn over the wool battledress uniform, but under the webbing equipment. The oversmock was then worn over all other uniform and equipment items, separating them from the parachute harness and rigging lines. Both the oversmock and the step-in smock it replaced were also called “jumping jackets”, which can easily cause confusion when reading original source material.


 
Guess it's better than being cut TO eight weeks...

They've been challenged to cut back their 'Rolls Royce' program for decades, but tend to take cover behind the Navy when the bullets fly.

36 weeks is outrageously long for a recruit course, the last 5 weeks of which is the Commando Course selection.

The Parachute Regiment recruit program is 24 weeks long, which includes a 1 week P Company selection followed by a 4 week parachute course, and produces a soldier easily as good as a Marine - if not better in some ways IMHO.
 
Ego writing cheques your military can't cash syndrome...

British Army deemed 'too small' as Keir Starmer tipped to make Ukraine defence pledge​

Ex-Army chiefs believe between 5,000 and 10,000 British troops would be needed to help keep the peace after Russian President Vladimir Putin pulls out of Ukraine.​


Defence experts have raised the alarm over the size of the British Army, warning it could be too small to help defend Ukraine once Russia’s war ends.

Sending the troops to Ukraine to assist with peacekeeping efforts has reportedly been an issue being discussed between Sir Keir Starmer and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky in recent days.

British soldiers would be joined by French troops to protect the country once Russia’s men pulled out of the war-torn territory, as part of a joint Franco-British mission.

The Prime Minister issued his strongest indication yet that he is open to the idea on Thursday night, during a joint press conference in Ukraine with Mr Zelensky. However, he stopped short of making an outright commitment.

 
Back
Top