• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

CAF Member Arrested and Charged Relating to Foreign Interference

Looked him up on the GAL. Let's just say this is not a place where you'd expect a breach like this. They will and should throw the book at this guy.

And of course his FB is full of convoy sympathy. Fits the profile.

Reset the counter I guess.....

You found his FB ? Must have been taken down by the time I looked.
 
Usual reminder: According to Canada's Charter of Rights and Freedoms, "Any person charged with an offence has the right .... to be presumed innocent until proven guilty according to law in a fair and public hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal" - none of the allegations have been proven in court.

This from MSM so far ...
"Canadian military intelligence member charged with espionage, says DND" (CBC)

Globe & Mail version (archived beyond firewall) here.
 
Foreign interference? The way I see it, that’s a pretty benign description by the government.. Am I wrong or does it suggest that the person being arrested is less guilty than the foreign entity trying to get an advantage over Canada? To me, it’s about spying. It’s about betrayal. It’s about warfare by other means. And if what I have just said doesn’t apply to the person being arrested, then maybe he shouldn’t have even charged at all. In other words, call a spade a spade and don’t sugarcoat it.
 
Usual reminder: According to Canada's Charter of Rights and Freedoms, "Any person charged with an offence has the right .... to be presumed innocent until proven guilty according to law in a fair and public hearing by an independent and impartial tribunal" - none of the allegations have been proven in court.

This applies to the law. Not social judgment.


Foreign interference? The way I see it, that’s a pretty benign description by the government.. Am I wrong or does it suggest that the person being arrested is less guilty than the foreign entity trying to get an advantage over Canada? To me, it’s about spying. It’s about betrayal. It’s about warfare by other means. And if what I have just said doesn’t apply to the person being arrested, then maybe he shouldn’t have even charged at all. In other words, call a spade a spade and don’t sugarcoat it.

If the charges are related to their current position, I suspect they've given up information on people rather than ops. Or even acted on a foreign government's information/persuasion to nullify a clearance. There's more than selling secrets that's dangerous here.
 
This applies to the law. Not social judgment.
100% - for better or worse. Still always a good reminder in places where opinion & speculation can range wildly, even before facts are fully out there.

It WILL be intriguing to see what comes out, given the menu of charges.
 
It WILL be intriguing to see what comes out, given the menu of charges.

The nature of the charges suggests that the trial may be informed by that of Cameron Ortiz, with proceedings in camera and limited information released to the public, after vetting by security officials and both Crown and defence counsel.
 
Given the nature of the charges, I wonder if there is a lot more to the story. I'm looking forward to hearing more as this unfolds.
Oh I can almost guarantee you that there's more to the story. Almost always is.

Whatever gets put in the disclosure file & discussed in open court will be pretty mindful to not directly or indirectly say anything that could compromise investigative techniques, intelligence sources, imvolvement of specific foreign intelligence services, etc etc
 
The nature of the charges suggests that the trial may be informed by that of Cameron Ortiz, with proceedings in camera and limited information released to the public, after vetting by security officials and both Crown and defence counsel.
For sure. I'm most curious about the alleged malingering, myself, given that (I suspect) that's a pretty rare charge - not to mention it stands out like the turd in a punchbowl full of other security charges.
 
For sure. I'm most curious about the alleged malingering, myself, given that (I suspect) that's a pretty rare charge - not to mention it stands out like the turd in a punchbowl full of other security charges.

My 100% uneducated guess would be it went something like:

0630: Hi boss cough cough, I have COVID and don't want to infect anyone so I will be staying home

1015: Hello comrade, good to see you here in the park again, here is that flash drive filled with the CDS' browsing history
 
There should be correspondence from DMCA on the RM. If he was given an RW, I highly doubt "you know what you did" was the totality of the interview.
 
Back
Top