daftandbarmy
Army.ca Fossil
- Reaction score
- 42,951
- Points
- 1,160
Interesting, I think the question should have been are Canadians willing to go themselves.
Based on recruiting numbers during the GWOT, I'd go with 'yes'.

Interesting, I think the question should have been are Canadians willing to go themselves.
Those trains left the station a long time ago…
They haven’t forgotten Katyn…like an attack dog straining on its leash…
At least there wasn’t also a 117, 163 and 9820 in the photo…![]()
If that happens, I see the total number climbing upwards eventually as well. Possibly an air detachment as well.(Permanent?) may become reality.
Military considers permanent bases in Latvia as part of Canada's NATO commitment
(Permanent?) may become reality.
Military considers permanent bases in Latvia as part of Canada's NATO commitment
Lahr part deux.
As much as I support the Latvia mission, I think recent experiences with our Southern neighbour make me somewhat leery of any "permanent" commitments. Certainly move to postings vs rotational deployments to ease the personnel issues and upgrade the facilities as required but is there really a strictly military need that requires a "permanent" commitment vs an ongoing mission that we can continue to renew going forward?(Permanent?) may become reality.
Military considers permanent bases in Latvia as part of Canada's NATO commitment
As much as I support the Latvia mission, I think recent experiences with our Southern neighbour make me somewhat leery of any "permanent" commitments. Certainly move to postings vs rotational deployments to ease the personnel issues and upgrade the facilities as required but is there really a strictly military need that requires a "permanent" commitment vs an ongoing mission that we can continue to renew going forward?
My concern is that Russia is in long-term decline and while that poses a definite risk in the near term and requires a strong deterrent response from NATO, we are also seeing some pretty seismic geopolitical shifts around us. Ongoing US commitment to NATO is in question and there are also concerns about how long our political goals will continue to align with our European NATO partners.
Nationalist and far-Right parties are increasingly seeing electoral success in many European countries. Hungary already has Orban. The UK Reform Party is leading in the poles. The National Rally may win in France. The AFD could possibly win in several Eastern German states in the next election. The Law and Justice Party when in power in Poland had a major illiberal bent. Italy has the Lega Nord and The Brothers of Italy. Geert Wilder's Party for Freedom is the largest party in the Netherlands House of Representatives. Nationalist/Right Wing parties have increased their share of the votes in recent elections in many other European countries as well, including the Denmark and Sweden with whom we are partnered in the Latvia mission.
I think it's important to remember the words of Lord Palmerston:
“Therefore I say that it is a narrow policy to suppose that this country or that is to be marked out as the eternal ally or the perpetual enemy of England. We have no eternal allies, and we have no perpetual enemies. Our interests are eternal and perpetual, and those interests it is our duty to follow.”
Excuse me as my unit better start dusting off 4 Svc Bn's stuffLahr part deux.
We're on the same wavelength. I think "postings" are essential if we're to stop the rotational rot that is going to be the demise of the army unless we stop it.Certainly move to postings vs rotational deployments to ease the personnel issues and upgrade the facilities as required but is there really a strictly military need that requires a "permanent" commitment vs an ongoing mission that we can continue to renew going forward?
Threats to use "economic force" to make us the 51st State accompanied by tariffs on some of our major exports that are higher than those imposed on the United States' nominal enemies?If you took away the media and political amplification of everything, what would the recent experiences with our Southern neighbor actually amount to? Accountability in defence spending?
Not posted there but the answer is - mostly no. There were a lot of jobs from Canex to bars to secretarial, but meaningful and professional were very limited.For those of you who were posted to Germany, were spouses generally employed with meaningful and professional work?
Threats to use "economic force" to make us the 51st State accompanied by tariffs on some of our major exports that are higher than those imposed on the United States' nominal enemies?
Now the CAF would likely need to invest in second language training for spouses to get jobs in the local economy, which might cause its own friction with the localsNot posted there but the answer is - mostly no. There were a lot of jobs from Canex to bars to secretarial, but meaningful and professional were very limited.
It was for much of the time there different generations altogether where the traditional nuclear family was still very much in vogue and second income families somewhat rare. My guess is that Latvia would be similarly limited in opportunities.
![]()
We were there from 71-74 and as you say it was pretty much entirely the traditional nuclear family and not a lot of working outside the house for spouses (or as they were then, wives...). Canex, the community centre, the youth centre, a few civilian jobs in offices or at the AMU but not much (my oldest brother would come over in the summers and work on the airfield). There were also Germans working in some of the civilian jobs. A very small number of dependents who could speak German might also have worked on the economy.Not posted there but the answer is - mostly no. There were a lot of jobs from Canex to bars to secretarial, but meaningful and professional were very limited.
It was for much of the time there different generations altogether where the traditional nuclear family was still very much in vogue and second income families somewhat rare. My guess is that Latvia would be similarly limited in opportunities.
![]()