• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

CAN-USA Tariff Strife (split from various pol threads)

I'm not concerned, but I don't like it. There should be an economic update soon. We, the public are required to see what is going on with our purse.

Unpredictable, or "needing to get a handle on it" or commiting to big spending in the short term are all reasons to wait out so your first financial update/budget is based in reality.
If by ‘the fall’, it means that by Sept 26th we get a budget, I’m fine with it, but if ‘by the fall’, turns out to be Dec 16th, then I’m not happy with the extended delay.
 
And just to lighten things up without tooooooo much of a derail, here's how Penguin Island (may have?) responded to tariffs ;) The style may be not unfamiliar to cold warriors out there - no pun intended. Have a good night & a great weekend!
 
Trump is targeting Canada again. Will we see TACO again this time?

They really are just sending out the same copy of the same letter to every country, but just changing names and an arbitrary tariff %.

Update: I am seeing talk that CUSMA goods may be keeping their exemption, if true then this is just more 🌮 indeed.
 
Last edited:
They really are just sending out the same copy of the same letter to every country, but just changing names and an arbitrary tariff %.

Update: I am seeing talk that CUSMA goods may be keeping their exemption, if true then this is just more 🌮 indeed.
This could be a carrot and stick approach by him as the current 'deadline' is for an agreement to be in placed by 21 July based on the G7 meetings/discussions.
 
This could be a carrot and stick approach by him as the current 'deadline' is for an agreement to be in placed by 21 July based on the G7 meetings/discussions.
More like he’s desperate to get something by that date. Apparently, there hasn’t been a line of countries beating down the White House door to make crappy deals with someone who has a history of reneging on deals.
 
More like he’s desperate to get something by that date. Apparently, there hasn’t been a line of countries beating down the White House door to make crappy deals with someone who has a history of reneging on deals.
Turns out from what I've read this morning that our 'new' date for an agreement has been pushed back to 1 Aug. So this 'new' 35% tariff is his attempt to draw a red line under the 1 Aug date.

What everyone seems to be forgetting is that NONE of these 'agreements' (such as the UK or Vietnam ones) are in fact law until Congress votes on them and it passes within Congress. Up until then, there is NOTHING preventing Trump from ignoring the agreed upon agreement because its not become law in the US.
 
Back
Top