- Reaction score
- 10,681
- Points
- 1,160
Good explanation of Trump's long term plans and why he is using tariffs.
![]()
Ian Lee: This is Trump's plan for global economic domination
A paper by one of the president's cabinet picks sets out the strategy behind tariff threatsnationalpost.com
This podcast was previously posted but it includes Ian Lee making his case to Brian Lilley.

The reason Trump plans to crush Canada that our politicians just don’t get: Full Comment podcast
Carlo Dade and Ian Lee examine what the 'America First' advisers around U.S. President Donald Trump really think
From the article posted by QV.
Economics not Guns.
Miran clearly indicates the U.S. will use its economic might — not its military might — as its primary instrument of coercion to achieve its strategic objectives.
CRTC on the table during CUSMA negotiations.
Moreover, Trump has stated he will create the architecture of a new world order without using soldiers and the military as the principal force de frappe. Or more accurately, the U.S. “soldiers” deployed to increase the hegemon’s power will be Google, Apple, Meta, Nvidia, Microsoft and other American tech giants.
Finance on the table
Miran documents and analyzes why Trump believes that the entire postwar international financial architecture, variously called the Bretton Woods system or simply multilateralism, has harmed American interests.
He states clearly that friend and foe alike took advantage of the U.S. in demanding and obtaining full access to American markets while protecting some segments of their own markets from entry by American corporations.
Security and Access linked (2% vs Tariffs)
Even worse, according to Miran, since 1945, the U.S. spent trillions on national defence to protect its allies. In 2024, the U.S. Department of Defence spent approximately $1 trillion. Miran notes that many allies did not contribute the two per cent of GDP agreed upon years ago by NATO signatories and thus were free riders benefiting from the U.S. military umbrella.
The US has tariff room to play with
Miran notes that as the U.S. has the lowest effective tariff rate in the world at three per cent per the World Trade Organization, it has greater latitude to raise its tariff rates. Miran clearly sees tariffs as a major policy tool to drive the rebalancing to reduce the value of the U.S. dollar relative to other currencies to improve the competitiveness of American manufacturing.
Security vs Tariffs again
This approach is additionally justified, Miran argues, by the enormous annual spending (currently $1 trillion annually) of the U.S. defence department to protect allies around the world, which Trump believes to be unfair.
In Miran’s words, “tariffs create negotiating leverage for incentivizing better terms from the rest of the world on both trade and security terms” because “national security and trade are joined at the hip.” This allows Trump to claim that it is a “privilege and not a right” for any foreign firm to enter the U.S. market.
Indeed, Miran argues for a “much stronger demarcation between friend, foe and neutral trading partner.” Friends, he describes, “are inside the security and economic umbrella, but there is more burden sharing” and “may experience more favourable trade or currency terms.”
“Those outside the security umbrella will also find themselves outside friendly arrangements for international trade and easy access to the U.S. consumer,” he adds. “They will have more aggressive costs imposed on them via tariffs and other policies.”
...
This is not novel.
We have enhanced military and civil co-operation in the past in order to secure access to the US market and protect Canadian jobs. PET did the same with Europe - buying German tanks for trade.