- Reaction score
- 10,687
- Points
- 1,160
Pretend for a moment Trump doesn't know that... his inner circle and the high level folks in his defence department advising him do know that. Canada getting serious on defence and arctic security means a little less for the Americans to worry and spend on it. And that would probably translate to easing the economic assault on us.
The problem there is that an independently armed Canada might choose to act independently and get above its station. I am pretty sure that America would not be best please if we acquired our own fleet of Long Range Ballistic Missiles from a third party and equipped a few with nuclear warheads. All purchased in the name of securing the Arctic and the Northwest Passage.
Likewise, something as simple as stocking up our warehouses with Long Range Air to Surface Missiles: Keeping in mind what a dozen men with 5 aircraft did to disrupt America for decades how concerned do you think they might be if they had a hostile government on their northern border equipped with a substantial amount of weaponry.
I think it suits the Americans to have empty warehouses in Canada and Canada buying from American production lines and warehouses on demand.
Canada doesn't need to invade America. It just has to disrupt America in the same way that Ukraine is disrupting Russia. Fort Henry secured Canada's 3 mile limit with 3 mile cannon. Now, within our budget, we have access to weapons that disrupt much deeper.
The Cuban Missile Crisis was all about Cuba becoming a launch site for missiles that could reach into the US.
Greenland and Canada have the potential to become what Cuba became, and a lot more easily. If Trump is actually concerned about that as a real possibility then his "rational" response would be to secure that ground and bring it under his control.
He wants Europeans to look after Europe. A re-armed Europe, a competent JEF, suits his needs. But does he want an independent Canada, allied to a Nuclear JEF, and/or a well-armed Asia, sitting on its northern border?
We haven't allowed ourselves to consider the possibilities because they are all very frightening and very expensive, presenting policy requirements we haven't had to consider in at least three generations.