Canada converts Sea Kings for battlefield role with SCTF
- Thread starter 404SqnAVSTeach
- Start date
They moved a lot of stores from Provider to shore in Somalia and provided an essential service. I don't recall seeing them in Belet Huen but there were distinct phases of the operation where they were doing a lot of ops on shore and others where they weren't as involved.
I have no direct knowledge but would think that the initial deployment phase would be when they were doing most of the airlift to shore.
When I was there the Belet Huen part of the operation had been well established and only required sustainment.
I have no direct knowledge but would think that the initial deployment phase would be when they were doing most of the airlift to shore.
When I was there the Belet Huen part of the operation had been well established and only required sustainment.
Don't forget that the CH124B config for SCTF PoC in Nov/Dec will be able to swing between straight troop lift with all the seats or be turned around reasonably quickly to use the sidefacing console with the usual (old) sensors minus ASW specific kit plus a few extra seats in the back depending on range/endurance requirements. In the latter config, the aft crew seats would be back in and the TACCO and AESOP would be back in their more conventional MH roles (minus ASW). Flexibility, the key to helo ops ?h3tacco said:
In other news, I heard an interesting brief from the Royal Navy Commando Helicopter Force. They are looking to convert more ex-dipper Sea Kings to Commando Role and to potentially put on the new Carson composite main rotor blades to further enhance their Sea King performance. They are now looking to at least 2020. Rumour has it they may even use surplus Sea Kings to replace the RAF's Puma's in the SH role.
Sea Kings did go ashore all the way into Belet Huen, at least once. After landing in the dust ball of all dust balls, it sat on the ground for days until a maintenance crew could come in and fix it. It was very early in the deployment b4 427 came in with maybe twin hueys still? Probably.
FSTO
Army.ca Fixture
- Reaction score
- 6,094
- Points
- 1,210
ch124xx said:
If you have access to the DIN go to the CMS website and click the SCF link at the bottom left. I just forget which link it is but there is a brief and a Lessons Learned (Access) section. Once I get back to work I'll post the link.
Here it is, go to search and type in SCF or SCTF and you'll get a ton of info. (some of it is even useful! ;D)
http://navy.dwan.dnd.ca/SCF/pages/ITEE06.asp
ch124xx said:
They did indeed do utility lift and recce/surveillance. Lots of utility lift. Utility lift, day in and day out. Did I mention they did utility lift? ;D
Until then, I'd never seen so many different things slung under a Sea Thing. I don't think there was a single person on the ship that didn't know what HDS stood for...
daftandbarmy
Army.ca Dinosaur
- Reaction score
- 33,692
- Points
- 1,160
For what it's worth, I've spent lots of time jumping in and out of Sea Kings from Norway to N.I. to the Gulf, from sea level to up around 9,000 ft, from minus 30C to plus 40 C, day and night, out at sea and over land, and I'm pretty much one of their biggest fans. Awesome helicopter. The version used by the Royal Navy (Mk 5 I think?) holds 16 fully loaded troops, two ski bundles, 2 loaded toboggans. We could also cram about 30 troops into them with just webbing on if we had to. Great navigation package. Tough as shoe leather. Small enough to drop into fairly restricted LZs (like a ship's deck, small SF base helipad, small mountainside meadows etc). Big enough to undersling a 105 lt gun or a loaded RHIB. Great platform for fast roping and rappelling. Good winch system. They're even great to parachute from. The US President flies in one. Civilian airlines use them. I see them all the time (S61 version) flying underslung logs around on the coast here. And they even float!
However, as with anything else, good performance is a function of adequate financial investment.
However, as with anything else, good performance is a function of adequate financial investment.
George Wallace
Army.ca Dinosaur
- Reaction score
- 208
- Points
- 710
geo said:
This has been covered before......The US President's 'Sea Kings' are not the same model as what we fly. In the role they play and the priority they would have for maintenance and upgrades, they no doubt have had all the 'Best' upgrades for that line of aircraft.
- Reaction score
- 1
- Points
- 430
IIRC Marine One was being replaced with an EH101s
- Reaction score
- 1
- Points
- 430
Yup...well we got the variant for SAR work
A
aesop081
Guest
Ex-Dragoon said:
GAP said:
Ex-Dragoon said:
Yhe ones that the US is buyin for POTUS are indeed EH-101s but are somewhat of a different beast altogether.
daftandbarmy said:
Spotter comment: Mk4 Commando or "Jungly" version is flown by RN in support of Royal Marines however they have converted some surplus ex-ASW Mk6 Pingers to the Mk6CR "Commando Role" config to take on basic Support Helo tasks from ship or ashore (Bosnia and NI while the Mk4's were or are in Irag). The Mk5's are used for SAR by the RN while the Mk3 and Mk3A's are used by the RAF for SAR. The Mk7's (ex Mk2's) are the new ASAC role in the oldest airframes. Straightforward ?
A team from DND visited the Commando Helicopter Fleet in the UK as a prep for the SCF conversion and other potential taskings. The CH124, based on the Sikorsky S61, and the Westlands Sea King have pretty similar airframes but have had much more investment in specific mods (nav, nvg, tricked out engines, etc). With the exception of the gnome engines and the stub wing sponsons the other mods are mostly doable if there was the mandate, funds, time, T&E resources, etc, etc. The Brits are also more risk tolerant when it comes to aircraft modification programs especially with respect to egress standards.
daftandbarmy
Army.ca Dinosaur
- Reaction score
- 33,692
- Points
- 1,160
As you can tell, I was merely cargo. Thanks for the details trainspotter!
BTW, as far as I know, none of the aircraft I flew in had armour. Definitely didn't have door guns; helps with the weight. Some of the NI versions had chaff or something attached for anti- SA7 purposes. SK also doesn't have a ramp, so it can be fiddly to get in/out of (or rather, ingress and egress). I also discovered that if you call ahead, the aircrew will sometimes put on a nice cup of chai for you. Very civilized.
I assume our newer choppers will be light years ahead of the old SK.
BTW, as far as I know, none of the aircraft I flew in had armour. Definitely didn't have door guns; helps with the weight. Some of the NI versions had chaff or something attached for anti- SA7 purposes. SK also doesn't have a ramp, so it can be fiddly to get in/out of (or rather, ingress and egress). I also discovered that if you call ahead, the aircrew will sometimes put on a nice cup of chai for you. Very civilized.
I assume our newer choppers will be light years ahead of the old SK.
