• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Canada moves to 2% GDP end of FY25/26 - PMMC

The majority of volunteering I see is by older retired folk. Partly as they have time and are still healthy enough to be functional and useful. Once the teenager hits adulthood, generally they are full time in building career, getting into a relationship, finding a place to live and have minimal time to volunteer. The middle age/middle class used to have time to volunteer and used to make up a significant amount of volunteering. Coaching, church, clubs, scouts, cadets, etc. Now they are both working and struggling to keep their heads above the fiscal water and may only volunteer for short while as their kids is involved, dropping out as their kid ages out.

Unions are part of the issue, along with management lack of risk taking when it comes to improving dual use of municipal property. It's less of an issue in small communities as everyone has a vested interest in making it work. In larger communities, it's less so and to be fair they might have dedicated community centres offering services fulltime, lessening the need.
 
We can't. We have to play the hand we're dealt. And that means accepting today's (vastly more resource constrained) reality, instead of constantly fantasizing about a past that is not coming back.

Actually, constitutionally, we can. That is the effect of parliamentary supremacy and the convention that no parliament can bind another. A treaty or contract with a parliamentary government is only valid for the life of the parliament. If nobody complains then the treaty or contract carries over from one parliament to the next. But by convention any parliament is free to withdraw from, or renegotiate, any treaty or contract. That doesn't mean they will be excused any contractually associated penalties from breaking the contract.
 
Actually, constitutionally, we can. That is the effect of parliamentary supremacy and the convention that no parliament can bind another. A treaty or contract with a parliamentary government is only valid for the life of the parliament. If nobody complains then the treaty or contract carries over from one parliament to the next. But by convention any parliament is free to withdraw from, or renegotiate, any treaty or contract. That doesn't mean they will be excused any contractually associated penalties from breaking the contract.

Get Parliament to legislate your access to the local school after hours? Good luck with that.
 
The majority of volunteering I see is by older retired folk. Partly as they have time and are still healthy enough to be functional and useful. Once the teenager hits adulthood, generally they are full time in building career, getting into a relationship, finding a place to live and have minimal time to volunteer. The middle age/middle class used to have time to volunteer and used to make up a significant amount of volunteering. Coaching, church, clubs, scouts, cadets, etc. Now they are both working and struggling to keep their heads above the fiscal water and may only volunteer for short while as their kids is involved, dropping out as their kid ages out.
One of the key turn offs for many now is the additional rules and barriers placed by many of the clubs/teams/organizations folks want to volunteer at. Buddy offered to help out minor hockey due to their coach being away for work for two weeks (and has family on the team)....after second practice isn't allowed to skate with kids anymore unless he completes the full coaching clinic and child safety courses which is two full weekends of time. He's not entering the rooms with kids, is there with 4 other parents on the ice...and probably will never return.

So many organizations have added policies and steps that are more about protecting the name then allowing the kids to do things it turns parents and others off. Certain organizations I was big into as a kid I would never put my own child into now due to the "protect the name, not the kid" attitude that chased off generations worth of volunteers. For example...a simple campfire for one youth group for kids to roast marshmellows requires paperwork filed a month in advance and evaluation of your skills to start a campfire - when almost every person has a campfire ring in their backyard here and the town offers free firewood in the town parks for visitors - because someone got burnt once and it needs to be safe.

Needs to be less internal red tape and frankly some acceptance that regardless of what you want to do some kids and adults will get hurt doing X exercise. Some simple gate keeper type checks sure (i.e criminal records check if working with kids) but things need to become simpler for volunteers too.
 
One of the key turn offs for many now is the additional rules and barriers placed by many of the clubs/teams/organizations folks want to volunteer at. Buddy offered to help out minor hockey due to their coach being away for work for two weeks (and has family on the team)....after second practice isn't allowed to skate with kids anymore unless he completes the full coaching clinic and child safety courses which is two full weekends of time. He's not entering the rooms with kids, is there with 4 other parents on the ice...and probably will never return.
So I will offer a contrary view -- want to coach - sign up and do the courses.
The rules are in place to ensure everyone safety.
Personally if there are 4 others on the ice, the fifth isn't needed, you can only have so many cooks...
Also only 4 coaches are allowed on the bench for games.
So many organizations have added policies and steps that are more about protecting the name then allowing the kids to do things it turns parents and others off. Certain organizations I was big into as a kid I would never put my own child into now due to the "protect the name, not the kid" attitude that chased off generations worth of volunteers. For example...a simple campfire for one youth group for kids to roast marshmellows requires paperwork filed a month in advance and evaluation of your skills to start a campfire - when almost every person has a campfire ring in their backyard here and the town offers free firewood in the town parks for visitors - because someone got burnt once and it needs to be safe.

Needs to be less internal red tape and frankly some acceptance that regardless of what you want to do some kids and adults will get hurt doing X exercise. Some simple gate keeper type checks sure (i.e criminal records check if working with kids) but things need to become simpler for volunteers too.
While a lot of the rules appear to be designed to protect the entity (and there is an abundance of that) those same rules are also in place to protect the participants. They give tools for the participants and parents to go after individuals and organizations that do not follow the rules, or worse.
 
So I will offer a contrary view -- want to coach - sign up and do the courses.
The rules are in place to ensure everyone safety.
Personally if there are 4 others on the ice, the fifth isn't needed, you can only have so many cooks...
Also only 4 coaches are allowed on the bench for games.

While a lot of the rules appear to be designed to protect the entity (and there is an abundance of that) those same rules are also in place to protect the participants. They give tools for the participants and parents to go after individuals and organizations that do not follow the rules, or worse.

Then there's the whole pedophile risk management thing ...

Scouts Canada kept 'confidential list' of pedophiles​

Lawyer calls for full disclosure of 'confidential list' records​


 
Forcing people to work without paying them, i.e making highschool kids do volunteer work to pass, isn't volunteering it's a form of slave labour.

Also, some organizations like big brothers & big sisters reject or discourage applications from people who are in programs like Police Foundations. They were finding when people got hired by the police they dropped the kids they were volunteering with. People were only doing it to get the volunteering check in the box.
 
Forcing people to work without paying them, i.e making highschool kids do volunteer work to pass, isn't volunteering it's a form of slave labour.

Also, some organizations like big brothers & big sisters reject or discourage applications from people who are in programs like Police Foundations. They were finding when people got hired by the police they dropped the kids they were volunteering with. People were only doing it to get the volunteering check in the box.

I think maybe only a handful of people from my high school year actually did the required voluntold hours, everyone in my immediate circle (including myself) just had an aunt/uncle or family friend sign the paperwork with our parent's blessing.
 
Back
Top