• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Canada moves to 2% GDP end of FY25/26 - PMMC

Quadruple it and it might be attractive. 250 bucks get you dinner and tank of gas for a family of four these days.

What's the goal? That's the question. Are we doing Supp Res just to have a list of names? No consideration of employability? What's the point?

Don't make it a tax credit. Make it an incentive program. $250 to verify all tombstone and qualification information on the list. $250 to have current medical and fitness test. $500 for IBTS to be current. Etc. We need similar incentives for PRes too. And honestly the new annual bonus for the Reg F should be tied to something like this.
 
Just use their equivalent RegF establishment. At roughly 135 ARes units @ appx 600 each gets you to roughly 83,000. Add in the HSvcs and MP reserves and AirRes and NavRes and Bob's your uncle. Then comes the hard part.
That would be the intellectually easy path to meeting huge growth targets. It would also ensure we continue to lack sustainment capability to actually be able to employ the grown force.
 
Careful, I might get up on my soap box about that again ;)

It's too bad that we seem to have exiled much of our Reg F from the population base that sustains it...
If the CAF wants to expand, I cant see it just being the army, the airforce and navy would expand to. For the airforce, to expand we would have two choices, expand current bases or duel use airports. Example Summerside could be explored for duel use military and civilian use, or former CFB Chatham, edmonton international is about to be duel use. It could be a good test model for RCAF expansion. Especially to expand the AIRres near major cities.
 
Nah. This is feel good nonsense to justify your opinion. You'll not be able to back this up with a shred of evidence.

At least when you talked about their system before post secondary, you were on to something.

Nah. It is not worth the effort for you will not accept the evidence of my own eyes.

Cheers, lad.
 
If the CAF wants to expand, I cant see it just being the army, the airforce and navy would expand to. For the airforce, to expand we would have two choices, expand current bases or duel use airports.
Dual use is definitely possible, and Comox proves it can be done with a busy, multi-mission wing and a reasonably active airport.
 
We have a system like that in Canada. CÉGEP.
Theres talk of instituting CEGEP in Manitoba in the French immersion stream which would be fantastic. Some pushback that is frankly valid is itll only serve to widen the academic gap between the Engliah only stream which leaves lots to be desired and the French immersion stream which is far more rigourous academically.
 
If the CAF wants to expand, I cant see it just being the army, the airforce and navy would expand to. For the airforce, to expand we would have two choices, expand current bases or duel use airports. Example Summerside could be explored for duel use military and civilian use, or former CFB Chatham, edmonton international is about to be duel use. It could be a good test model for RCAF expansion. Especially to expand the AIRres near major cities.
Lots of room at CFB Winnipeg for expansion.
 
We will need to offer more than one pathway. That said, I think you'd be surprised by how many would sign up for a year if they knew that school would then be paid for. That's the part you're missing here.
Not missing it at all and I fully agree - multiple paths is what are needed.
today's high school graduate is probably not anywhere as mature as you were back then. They may get through training. Not sure I trust them leading troops full time at 20 though.
You obviously didn't know me at 16 because if you had you wouldn't be giving me credit for maturity. :giggle: Having been a young gunner in the ranks back then I can pretty much say that it's a given that a large number of them will be lacking in maturity when they join. It comes with time and being given responsibility and trust. Quite a few never make it. Most do.
I won't even get to the changing nature of war and the impact of Somalia in driving a fully degreed officer corps.
Yup. That was pretty much CYA season.

That would be the intellectually easy path to meeting huge growth targets. It would also ensure we continue to lack sustainment capability to actually be able to employ the grown force.
The point actually was that to create a unit model is easy. As you say, developing the force structure - what capabilities are needed, in what quantities, and how to equip, train and sustain the force are a much more complex issue.
Lots of room at CFB Winnipeg for expansion.
There used to be a lot more, and at Calgary and other places. :(

🍻
 
Back
Top