• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Canada moves to 2% GDP end of FY25/26 - PMMC

The lack of Ventilation help keep the asbestos in place ;)

Indoor ranges (properly built) are expensive.
And realistically it’s outrageously (prohibitively) expensive to build anything beyond 100m with multiple firing lanes.
Not only expensive to build but expensive to operate and maintain. The range in our headquarters requires regular changes of very expensive filters, plus regular blood tests for the training personnel. I don't know if workplace rules for the CAF are different but OHSA rules for public servants in Ontario are fairly strict. I assume that if the CAF wanted to engage the public, its rules would change as well.

Maybe an outdoor range in Petawawa or Gagetown might be attractive to a small number of locals, but I suspect the chances of building an outdoor range in a Canadian urban area - where the population is - would be vanishingly small.

Even the regular use of public outdoor ranges (which the majority of OPP members use simply because it is a deployed service) is subject to local concerns about noise and soil contamination.


How do you feel about virtual ranges for basic weapons handling, sight pictures and breath control?

An in-armoury adjunct to outside ranges.
I don't know how common they are but North Bay has a 'virtual' range.
 
Halifax ? It is or was the biggest personnel base in the CAF.
I suspect the Navy does not have a lot of free space it wants to hand to an Army Reserve simulation centre. But you will note my comment was about the big Army bases.

That first criteria should make any urban/suburban facility about 45-60 mins max by transit.
That doesn’t make the big Army bases accessible via public transit. You can’t get to somewhere in 45-60 min on transit if transit doesn’t get closer than a 20 min jog away.
 
Second, why not build more than just annual basic readiness? The more training that been be done locally, the more interest we'll have, the better the reserve experience and the more skilled they'll be. We should aim to be able to do all of BMQ and most of BMQ-L locally. Just throw in a field phase on weekends or in the summer.
I would expect that the vast majority of the soldiers who entered the Militia and went to war in 1914 got their start with the Dominion of Canada Rifle Association (and the ammunition that the government provided to it) and the Royal Canadian Army Cadets. You can get a great jump on things, not to mention create awareness amongst the population in general, by making things easy for young folks to participate.

We bean count and overthink things too much to the point where we become moribund within our own heads.

:unsure:
 
That doesn’t make the big Army bases accessible via public transit. You can’t get to somewhere in 45-60 min on transit if transit doesn’t get closer than a 20 min jog away.

There were exactly two bases where I told Gemini to consolidate with the cities they are in: Valcartier and Edmonton. And fair enough if that's impractical don't put them on base. This wasn't meant to a precise plan. It's a thought exercise on Gemini that took me 10 mins, just to work out a rough order of magnitude on what it would take to have the kind of facilities and accessibilities the Singaporeans have, for most Canadians. You're free to build your own model too.
 
I would expect that the vast majority of the soldiers who entered the Militia and went to war in 1914 got their start with the Dominion of Canada Rifle Association (and the ammunition that the government provided to it) and the Royal Canadian Army Cadets. You can get a great jump on things, not to mention create awareness amongst the population in general, by making things easy for young folks to participate.

We bean count and overthink things too much to the point where we become moribund within our own heads.

:unsure:
having a range in the basement of the high school certainly helped create interest.
 
Firstly, is that even an appropriate readiness standard going forward? Maybe CA reservists should have more allocated to them per year than an air force desk jockey like me in Ottawa.

Second, why not build more than just annual basic readiness? The more training that been be done locally, the more interest we'll have, the better the reserve experience and the more skilled they'll be. We should aim to be able to do all of BMQ and most of BMQ-L locally. Just throw in a field phase on weekends or in the summer.

Third for me is proximity. There has to be some goal. Do we want half the population within a 30 min drive, 45 min transit ride, etc. of a training facility? I'm particularly thinking of the reality that the number of driving licenses and car ownership is declining among young people. In any major city, you'll see young reservists taking the subway in.
1. God no, but thats what the powers that be have dictated

2. That requires more budget, and investment in the ARes, including more training time

3. Declining yes, im an advocate for mass transit between bases. ABs regional rail plan is think should have passenger trains stopping in suffield/ralston and wainwright. This would allow low cost, transportation of troops regularly
 
If they're not broken, like they used to be all the time, and you're not waiting for months for the guy from Quebec to travel three time zones to fix it for you ;)
Honestly that is an easy fix. Contract a local company to fix the system and or put it in the contract that is has to be fixed within 24hrs and make the three time zone person get on the next plane to fix the problem.
 
If they're not broken, like they used to be all the time, and you're not waiting for months for the guy from Quebec to travel three time zones to fix it for you ;)
Thankfully there is a project to replace the SAT, sadly its still some time before it happens
 
If they're not broken, like they used to be all the time, and you're not waiting for months for the guy from Quebec to travel three time zones to fix it for you ;)
I suspect that is a unit problem, not a contractor problem.

The small exposure I have has to SATs is that they are reliable and the contractor will fix stuff quickly. If they know about it…
 
Believe it or not the Army is not the sole user or employer of small arms in the CAF.
Dude, everyone knows that, and nobody has challenged that. The proposal was for an Army Reserve training facility. Do you think the Navy wants to give-up space in Halifax for that?
 
Dude, everyone knows that, and nobody has challenged that. The proposal was for an Army Reserve training facility. Do you think the Navy wants to give-up space in Halifax for that?

Why would the RCN need to approve or give something up ?

Do know there is an ARes brigade HQ'd in Halifax ?

And Halifax has at least 6 ARes units ?

And Roughly 10k Reg force that could also use the ranges.

Seems like a good place invest.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ytz
Do know there is an ARes brigade HQ'd in Halifax ?

And Halifax has at least 6 ARes units?
Yes. You are again introducing information that everyone knows.

Why would the RCN need to approve or give something up ?
The proposal we are discussing puts an indoor range in CFB Halifax, so you are looking at the dockyard, Stadaconda, or Shearwater. Even old 5 Div offices in RA Park are already being taken over by RCN. Local armouries are not part of nearby bases. So where do you build exquisite indoor ranges in CFB Halifax without impacting the Navy?
 
Back
Top