Canada should join the (nuclear) big leagues

[dapaterson]

A sober Senate...good thing Ted Kennedy isn't still alive.

That comment, today of all days...

 

[Cloud Cover]

Was thinking about this a bit more the other day. Fun Fact: in the 1960’s, Italy modified at least 1 Duca degli Abruzzi-class cruiser to carry 4 Polaris ICBMs. While these missiles were never acquired, Italy did design the Alfa ship launched MRBM - and tested it - but never put the missile into production. But they did prove the concept of a surface ship launched, medium range ballistic missile. And they did it on a ship that was 30+ years old.

I’m not sure what type of delivery system the higher ups might think Canada could acquire. But as a proof of concept, Italy has some experience and at least a working theory stored away in the knowledge vaults. OTOH, our submarine choice could very well come equipped with a BM facility.

But if we are talking about an independent defensive nuclear strike ballistic missile capability a surface ship seems to be the place to at least start. And where do we get the targeting and other capability and infrastructure. I doubt we would dual purpose NORAD facilities since an independent capability implies no reliance on other countries in the plans to use it, should that be necessary.

 

[Fishbone Jones]

I like nuclear, and I'd like to see it happen, but:

1) We don’t have the people,
2) We don’t have the money,
3) We don’t have the political will.

It won’t happen in my lifetime.

 

[Cloud Cover]

The way the Liberals excel at whipping up people into an anti American frenzy, if Carney pronounced we need it to deter the US from an invented threat, well then the debate is over.
I’m still on the fence about nuclear weapons. Part of me says yes- but maybe all the rest has to go? Our one and only defence posture would be don’t f*ck with us or we’ll nuke you. It’s badass but impractical and a little harsh.

But to have a well equipped conventional force backed up with the deterrence of retaliatory nuclear strike capability, that is the sweet spot I think. Expensive but perhaps necessary.

Or subscribe to weapons like Germany. That gets us nothing but cost and no deterrence.

Or do nothing of the sort. I don’t think this is a long term option anymore as these weapons are possibly about to go mainstream.

 

[Fishbone Jones]

The way the Liberals excel at whipping up people into an anti American frenzy, if Carney pronounced we need it to deter the US from an invented threat, well then the debate is over.
I’m still on the fence about nuclear weapons. Part of me says yes- but maybe all the rest has to go? Our one and only defence posture would be don’t f*ck with us or we’ll nuke you. It’s badass but impractical and a little harsh.

But to have a well equipped conventional force backed up with the deterrence of retaliatory nuclear strike capability, that is the sweet spot I think. Expensive but perhaps necessary.

Or subscribe to weapons like Germany. That gets us nothing but cost and no deterrence.

Or do nothing of the sort. I don’t think this is a long term option anymore as these weapons are possibly about to go mainstream.

Maybe we could just stick to battlefield nukes?

 

[OldSolduer]

How many more Nukes does the world need? None IMO we can destroy ourselves quite nicely with the ones on hand.

 

[Kirkhill]

How many more Nukes does the world need? None IMO we can destroy ourselves quite nicely with the ones on hand.

Do you remeber the proverbial nuclear handgrenade? Low yield so little damage but you couldn't get out of the blast radius fast enough?

What if you could fly one down a vent from 1500 km away?

 

[OldSolduer]

Do you remeber the proverbial nuclear handgrenade? Low yield so little damage but you couldn't get out of the blast radius fast enough?

What if you could fly one down a vent from 1500 km away?

You mean like Luke nuking the Death Star?

 

[Halifax Tar]

I like nuclear, and I'd like to see it happen, but:

1) We don’t have the people,
2) We don’t have the money,
3) We don’t have the political will.

It won’t happen in my lifetime.

How many ancient commissionaires would we need to hire to guard our silos ?

I jest of course, but we need to get a lot more serious as a country and as a military before we pick up the biggest stick from the tree.

 

[KevinB]

Y’all won’t even seriously consider SSN’s.

There is NFW you would jump past nuclear powered vessels into nuclear weapons.

 

[Halifax Tar]

Y’all won’t even seriously consider SSN’s.

There is NFW you would jump past nuclear powered vessels into nuclear weapons.

Do you think I actually expected to get serious about stuff ? lol

I have said numerous time. I don't actually predict Canada will survive the expected life span of my daughter.