• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Canada's tanks

I think that if you can get a 70 tonne vehicle to the front the the locals will add another 10 tonnes of whatever protection they think works for them. That will likely include APS and CUAS systems, the best that they can patch together.

Scrim nets, scaffolding, railway ties, rails, spare tracks, sandbags, homemade ERA all come to mind.

If you can get the vehicle to the front in the first place.
 
Is no one going to mention the tri-barrel coax gun in some of images?
1750362811942.png

Speculation is that one of the coax options could be the 12.7 GAU-19/B

It will still have a 120mm main gun with an autoloader.
As secondary armaments there seems to have a 7.62mm RWS and a coax GAU-19/B 12.7mm rotary cannon. The RWS is also used as the commander sight.
 
Any opinions on rubber tracks?

Smoother ride? Quieter? Less vibration? Less weight? How easy are they to repair?

Less maintenance but unrepairable as they're a solid piece. Good for lightweight track like TLAVs. Less tear on infrastructure too.
 
Here's my worry, and something we need to consider about tanks. Weight, and not of the tank directly. The average weight limit of bridges in Europe is 44 tons. Anything over that and we start limiting where our armoured formations can go unless we start dropping our own bridges which will slow things down.
 
One of the things I would do if I were King would be to spend an insane amount of cash on Combat engineering units .
Including and I'm fairly certain that this won't come as a surprise bridging unit's.
 
One of the things I would do if I were King would be to spend an insane amount of cash on Combat engineering units .
Including and I'm fairly certain that this won't come as a surprise bridging unit's.
I'd start with mines and mine layers. Bridging can wait a little.

;)
 
One of the things I would do if I were King would be to spend an insane amount of cash on Combat engineering units .
Including and I'm fairly certain that this won't come as a surprise bridging unit's.

I've noticed that both the Russians and Ukrainians have been using a lot of pontoons.

At the same time they both seem to value amphibious vehicles. In fact the Nordics, Poles, and Koreans all seem to maintain a riverine amphibious capability.

The Korean K21 and Polish Borsuk IFVs are both amphibious.
The Korean K808, Polish Rosomak, Finland's Patria AMV, Pasi, CAV, GTP, MiSu and Famous and Sweden's Bandvagns (206, 206S, Viking and Beowulf) are all amphibious.

It seems that they all have the means to secure both banks of major water obstacles, and to cross minor water bodies, without resorting to the engineers.
 
It seems that they all have the means to secure both banks of major water obstacles, and to cross minor water bodies, without resorting to the engineers.
There's a bit of an art to bank preparation in order to make swimming you amphibs (and snorkeling tanks) possible. That's definitely an engineer task.

🍻
 
There's a bit of an art to bank preparation in order to make swimming you amphibs (and snorkeling tanks) possible. That's definitely an engineer task.

🍻

A good recce team can read the banks. There are natural approaches and existing man-made approaches that can be exploited. Even if you have to go upstream a ways to where the waterway narrows.

Robert and Gene demonstrate how not to do it.

Elliot showed the alternate.

And then there was the DUKW and the Scheldt at Walcheren.

The Calgary Highlanders, along with the Maisies and the Watch, would have been happy to have had the DUKWs.
 
Back
Top