Whitmer's pandemic orders were 'necessary,' court finds in denying injunction
The Michigan Court of Claims on Wednesday denied a motion for a preliminary injunction by several state residents who claimed that Gov. Gretchen Whitmer’s executive actions related to the pandemic infringe on their constitutional rights.
In a complaint last week with the Michigan Court of Claims, five residents alleged that the “mandatory quarantine” imposed by the Stay Home, Stay Safe order and the intrastate travel restrictions contained in an earlier version violated their rights to both procedural due process and substantive due process.
A federal lawsuit filed this month against state officials argued provisions of the order were “arbitrary, capricious, irrational and abusive,” and said “the individual plaintiffs are prohibited from traveling freely within the state of Michigan, visiting family and friends, attending to or utilizing their privately owned property, and visiting their significant others.”
In his opinion and order Wednesday, Michigan Court of Claims Judge Christopher Murray said constitutional rights are “subject to reasonable regulation by the state.”
...