• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

CEFCOM Commander: Tide Peaks in 2009, Turns by 2010 in AFG?

The Bread Guy

Moderator
Staff member
Directing Staff
Subscriber
Donor
Reaction score
7,186
Points
1,360
Shared in accordance with the "fair dealing" provisions, Section 29, of the Copyright Act.

Canadian commander sees Afghan conflict peaking in 2009
GRAEME SMITH, Globe and Mail, 16 Dec 08
Article link
KANDAHAR, AFGHANISTAN — After years of bloody escalations in the Afghan war, the violence will finally start to subside in 2010, according to an unusually bold prediction by a top Canadian commander.

Lieutenant-General Michel Gauthier, responsible for all overseas forces and widely viewed as the most experienced military official on Afghan issues, said he believes an influx of U.S. troops next year will bring a new surge in the violence.

But 2009 will mark an historic peak in the conflict, the commander said, and the level of bloodshed will start to decrease the following year as Afghanistan's government and security forces become strong enough to handle the situation.

“There will be decreased violence in 2010, and increased capacity naturally, especially where we're focused,” he said, referring to Canada's zone of operations in Kandahar.

Many analysts have predicted the Afghan war will grow next year, as thousands of U.S. forces are expected to challenge the Taliban's increasing hold on the country. Brigadier-General Richard Blanchette, NATO's chief spokesman, said recently that he expects greater conflict in 2009.

But the comments from Lieut.-Gen. Gauthier mark the first declaration of Canada's expectations of the results that will be achieved in the next season of fighting. It's a public expression of what other military officials have been saying in private, a “no pain, no gain” philosophy that describes a bigger war as necessary in the short term to achieve progress in the medium term.... (more on link)

More from CBC here.
 
No doubt the baddies are eyeing the imminent arrival of the US force increase next year, and realizing that if they want to shape conditions for their own success before the US gets fully dug in, they will have to move now or very soon. The longer they wait,  the more time they cede to NATO (at least one new NATO member will be deploying a significant task force for the first time) and to the US. The US in 2009 will have a very popular president who has clearly stated that Afghanistan is a priority for him. US troop levels in Iraq will probably drop, eventually freeing more forces for redepl to Afgh. The Islamic Republic of Afghanistan will hold elections next year, which should serve as a further demonstration to the world that progress is being made. None of these things will be good for the insurgents, who so far seem to have failed to articulate any useful political vision for their Afghanistan. Without that, it doesn't look much like they're interested in talking, leaving more violence as their primary tool to get whatever it is they're looking for.

Cheers

pbi
 
pbi said:
No doubt the baddies are eyeing the imminent arrival of the US force increase next year, and realizing that if they want to shape conditions for their own success before the US gets fully dug in, they will have to move now or very soon. The longer they wait,  the more time they cede to NATO (at least one new NATO member will be deploying a significant task force for the first time) and to the US. The US in 2009 will have a very popular president who has clearly stated that Afghanistan is a priority for him. US troop levels in Iraq will probably drop, eventually freeing more forces for redepl to Afgh. The Islamic Republic of Afghanistan will hold elections next year, which should serve as a further demonstration to the world that progress is being made. None of these things will be good for the insurgents, who so far seem to have failed to articulate any useful political vision for their Afghanistan. Without that, it doesn't look much like they're interested in talking, leaving more violence as their primary tool to get whatever it is they're looking for.

Cheers

pbi

Lets not forget the new incursions into Pakistan by US forces.  I think we can expect to see these increase as well.  The taliban are going to get the screws put to them real good this year.
 
I remember 'victory' being predicted/ declared in Northern Ireland a few times by various politicians and soldiers, years before the latest peace broke out. This usually happened just before the terrorists blew us up again, or committed yet another heinous atrocity of some kind.

Don't count your chickens before they're hatched General, at least not in public. The bad guys in these kinds of conflicts don't tend to stick to the script.  ;)
 
Back
Top