Quirky
Army.ca Veteran
- Reaction score
- 4,517
- Points
- 1,260
perhaps if we weren't flying the sopwith camels of the 21st century getting folks to fly wouldn't be such a problem
If the F-35 can't help with retention then it's not a question of equipment.

perhaps if we weren't flying the sopwith camels of the 21st century getting folks to fly wouldn't be such a problem
Read in to the program, perhaps.How long did the RN and the RAF spend sending their F35 pilots to train with the USAF/USN/USMC? How many of their pilots were trained with the Yanks?
Why not start slotting Canadians into the American rotations?
That also seems to be part of the game plan with AUKUS subs. Mixed crews.
We don't have it yet and if I signed up now I would be on F18's for most of my flying career. My rationalization being that my training would just have been completed at the time the first ones arrive. Assuming that both seniority rules and the need to get some return on their training investment dollar I would be one of the last to transition.If the F-35 can't help with retention then it's not a question of equipment.
Nah, the solution is to assemble intelligent and persuasive information to convince government to make a decision, and not half ass a sole source.
Oh, and to make sure that the half assed some source proposal doesn't include features that have not been implemented yet as your sole source rationale.
TL;DR put smart people in charge, not a fighter pilot with a pay to play executive MBA.
Read in to the program, perhaps.
You aren’t Alan Williams secret offspring, are you?The JSF MOU provides for the opportunity, but not obligation, to procure. The decision to enter into the MOU at no time created an obligation - and indeed left many ways to leave.
JSF is a boondoggle of waste and of engineering being trumped by porkbarrel politics and small whiny communities inflicting damage on the greater good (looking at you, USMC). That it's now the only game in town does not absolve the program of its many sins, nor make it a model worth emulating in the future.
No - but we shouldn't have written a SOR that the F35, at the time of writing, did not meet.You aren’t Alan Williams secret offspring, are you?
So we should have gone with Gripen for how much Canada actually cares about integratable capability?
You’ll have to be more specific as to which of the SORs we wrote to which you are referring. The number of variants is non-unitary…No - but we shouldn't have written a SOR that the F35, at the time of writing, did not meet.
We were told a lot of things in life that didn't pan out to be true...Weren’t we told that buying antique Aussie retired Hornets would make things AOK?![]()
One of which was the Super Hornet interm plan which would’ve effectively killed the F-35 in Canada. The Aussie hornets weren’t that bad compared to the alternative.We were told a lot of things in life that didn't pan out to be true...
The JSF MOU provides for the opportunity, but not obligation, to procure. The decision to enter into the MOU at no time created an obligation - and indeed left many ways to leave.
JSF is a boondoggle of waste and of engineering being trumped by porkbarrel politics and small whiny communities inflicting damage on the greater good (looking at you, USMC). That it's now the only game in town does not absolve the program of its many sins, nor make it a model worth emulating in the future.
Sure but what homework was really need? Here is the jet, you really have no other choice. And there was truty no other choice. Yes Tory government did chicken out but would have move back after the election. It's was just repeat of No helicopter. Same out come.The initial refusal to exercise the option to purchase through the JSF MoU was made well, well before the 2015 election.
The inability of the RCAF leadership to carry it across the finish line then was interesting to watch. Fighter jocks, having seen tac and strat lift, and medium/ heavy helos acquired quickly and easily, decided they didn't have to do their homework.
Canada DID technically have a choice, as there were a few options out there that would have given us a fresh fighter force & Canadians would have been happy with. (As happy as the mainstream media would allow them to be, I suppose...)Sure but what homework was really need? Here is the jet, you really have no other choice. And there was truty no other choice. Yes Tory government did chicken out but would have move back after the election. It's was just repeat of No helicopter. Same out come.
The initial refusal to exercise the option to purchase through the JSF MoU was made well, well before the 2015 election.
The inability of the RCAF leadership to carry it across the finish line then was interesting to watch. Fighter jocks, having seen tac and strat lift, and medium/ heavy helos acquired quickly and easily, decided they didn't have to do their homework.
The role of the generals is to effectively communicate to decision makers.…ah, so now people are saying it’s the generals making the decision?
I’ll stick with “What is hot potato tossing by politicians for decades?” for $1000, Alex…
Greece, Poland, Spain, Italy, Spain, Denmark all run at least two different fighter Aircraft if not more. The amount of NATO partners that operate multi fighter fleets is almost all of them.Do you have an example? I'd have no issue with another fleet that wasn't stationed in Cold lake. Also the issue to manning currently pretty much kills any notion of multi fighter fleets. We can barely keep our heads above water with one fighter fleet.