• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Coalition troops prepare major Afghan offensive

Scoobie Newbie

Army.ca Legend
Inactive
Reaction score
1
Points
410
http://www.ctv.ca/servlet/ArticleNews/story/CTVNews/20060613/afghanistan_template_060614/20060614?hub=TopStories

CTV.ca News Staff

More than 11,000 coalition troops in Afghanistan, including around 2,200 Canadians, are preparing to launch the largest offensive ever against the Taliban.

The mission will target a group of insurgents thought to be responsible for a recent rise in militant activity in the volatile southern part of the country.

U.S, British and Canadian soldiers will begin the offensive on Thursday, looking to crack down on Taliban fighters in four provinces.

"The whole objective is to push Taliban insurgents out of the safe havens that they have been enjoying for several years now," CTV's Steve Chao told Canada AM, reporting from Kandahar.

"What essentially has been happening for the past few years is that the Taliban developed quarters up in the rural areas in the mountains. The whole goal of this is to get the coalition troops, involving U.S., British and Canadians troops, up into these mountains to push them out."

In addition to engaging the enemy, however, one of the goals of Operation Mountain Thrust, is to win the support of locals in isolated villages that have rarely seen foreigners, Chao said.

The operation will also involve a reconstruction phase, and will focus on southern Uruzgan and northeastern Helmand, where the coalition forces says most of the insurgents are massed.

Meanwhile, coalition and Afghan forces killed 26 suspected insurgents on Wednesday in fighting in the eastern mountains near the border with Pakistan.

In a separate attack Wednesday, four civilians were killed when their home was hit in a rocket attack by insurgents.

One Afghan police officer was also wounded in Wednesday's fighting.

Recently, insurgent violence has reached its highest level of activity since the former Taliban-led government was dismantled following the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks.

"This is not just about killing or capturing extremists," U.S. spokesman Col. Tom Collins told reporters in Kabul on Wednesday.

"We are going to go into these areas, take out the security threat and establish conditions where government forces, government institutions, humanitarian organizations can move into these areas and begin the real work that needs to be done."

The massive force of 11,000 soldiers marks the largest deployment yet for a single mission in Afghanistan.

The task of gaining support and trust among the isolated Afghans may be one of the most difficult yet for the coalition forces, Chao said.

"You have to imagine that this country has been involved in civil war for 30 years. It is one that has been a pawn of several outside countries including Pakistan, the U.S. and the Soviets," Chao told AM.

"There is a great deal of mistrust of any government that seems to be supported by foreign troops, especially here in the south where it is tribal. People are loyal to those that they know and often those they know are the Taliban."

Maj. Gen. Benjamin C. Freakley, U.S. operational commander in Afghanistan, earlier told The Associated Press that coalition and Afghan troops would attack "Taliban enemy sanctuary or safe haven areas" in Kandahar, Helmand, Zabul and Uruzgan provinces.

"Right now ... they'll be in one area, they'll move out of that area, they'll conduct an attack in another area, then move back to a safe haven," he told AP last week in an interview at Bagram, the U.S. military headquarters north of Kabul.

"This is our approach to put simultaneous pressure on the enemy's networks, to cause their leaders to make mistakes, and to attack those leaders," Freakley said.

The offensive officially began on May 15 when coalition forces began targeting Taliban hideouts. Since then, about 550 people have died -- mostly militants, according to U.S. and Afghan figures.

At least nine coalition soldiers have been killed in combat operations during that time.

If everything goes according to plan, Thursday will mark the start of the summer-long anti-Taliban campaign.

On Wednesday, U.S. troops constructed sand walls and guard posts around a small forward-operating base that will serve as a support post for the operation.

About 2,300 U.S. conventional and special forces will be involved in the operation, along with 3,300 British troops, 2,200 Canadians, about 3,500 Afghan soldiers and coalition air support, Freakley said.

The offensive has been in the works for about 18 months. It takes place as militant activity experienced a surge in the southern and eastern provinces of Afghanistan.

Another offensive, involving 2,500 U.S. and Afghan troops, was launched in mid-April in the eastern Kunar province. That operation is still ongoing, but has entered its reconstruction phase.

The Taliban is thought to be strongest in the south and has been steadily gaining strength and support since the Taliban-led government fell in 2001.

"I think this summer the Taliban is stronger than they've been in years," military spokesman, Lt. Col. Paul Fitzpatrick told AP.

With files from The Associated Press


When did we get more tip of the spear soldiers?
 
Here's hoping and praying for several things, not the least of which is the safety of our troops.


God Speed!
:salute:
 
As Von G said, praying for many things, including the safety and success of our troops!

Good hunting, and good luck!

:salute:
 
GO get them Troops :salute:

Keep your head down and your eyes up. Hubby keep your butt safe. LOL :cdn:
 
More than 11,000 coalition troops in Afghanistan, including around 2,200 Canadians, are preparing to launch the largest offensive ever against the Taliban.
Translation: "Hey Bad Guys! We're coming real soon, so if you're going to run away to Pakistan so you can re-group, you'd better do it now."  ::)
 
paracowboy said:
Translation: "Hey Bad Guys! We're coming real soon, so if you're going to run away to Pakistan so you can re-group, you'd better do it now."  ::)
Maybe that trap is already set and waiting for them at the border?
 
Always makes me wonder why they put that info into the paper....kind of like a warning. Ill count to 10...and if your not gone we are going to kill you!!!


Good point vonGarvin!!!
 
Give them hell!!!! Red devils rule the ground!!! >:D! (ok so i've been brainwashed by my husband hehehe) :cdn:
 
We may get some good int from CNN.  They have an imbedded reporter with the Canadians.  There was a good spread on them this morning.

P.S.  2VP is second to none.
 
CTV Newsnet at 1100 and CBC Newsworld at 1200 referred to this being the largest operation since the US "invasion" of 2001.  Following letter sent to them:

'...That is inaccurate and misleading.

There was in fact no invasion.  The Afghan Northern Alliance received American air support and assistance from special forces (both U.S. and British); that however is not an invasion. Substantial foreign ground combat forces only entered the country after the Taliban regime had been deposed by these indigenous Afghan forces in November 2001, and those foreign troops entered with the agreement of the Northern Alliance.

This is no mere semantic quibble.  Describing what the U.S. and U.K. did in Afghanistan in 2001 as an "invasion" tends to equate those actions in people's minds with the real invasion of Iraq.  That equation implicitly and wrongly calls into question the legitimacy of the initial operations in Afghanistan.  These operations were the legitimate exercise of the right in international law of self-defence against a regime that allowed al Qaeda to operate extensively in Afghanistan and to plot there the terrorist attacks on the U.S. of September 11, 2001.

"Intervention" would be the proper word.'

Mark
Ottawa
 
::)

Damn it Mark.....you beat me to it.  ;)

Regards

 
Recce By Death: Don't be deterred! The more reaction the better.

Mark
Ottawa
 
A little late Teddy.  I already reported this here: http://forums.army.ca/forums/threads/45129.0.html
Reply 12.  Admittedly though without any linkage.
 
Back
Top