• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

DND warns capability of Canadian military and equipment is dropping

BWilly

Guest
Reaction score
0
Points
10
percent.webp



This is absolutely ridiculous to see laid out like this. How do we fix this? Is there a bottom where everyone says enough is enough? Do we do away with the DEI and go back to a warrior ethos? Is there a happy medium? I'm interested to hear everyone's thoughts and solutions.
 
DEI didn't undercut Project Management, implement Byzantine financial processes, fail to do a proper lifecycling management assessment for spares, or make defence procurement beholden to the economic needs of Ste Poutaine de Caliss, QC.
 
Unless DEI siphoned a billion dollars from O&M last year (Coles Notes: It did not), it's not the problem. Chronic under funding of both O&M and capital procurements (as well as their glacial pace) is fueling the decline.
DEI is a bunch of nonesense; it's not even a recent underfunding, it's been like that my entire career of almost 20 years, coupled with operation demands that don't allow for things like maintenance.

Add in lack of people, hiring freezes and the massive growth in bureaucratic processes and it leads to way less happening than it sould.

Anyone that thinks a 'warrior ethos' will overcome decades of underfunding and chronic overtasking is probably rage baiting.
 
The current state of readiness has everything to do with a $1B budget cut that “wasn’t a budget cut” on top of pre-existing underfunding of the sustainment budget. Of course things are getting worse. If you want a quick fix, double the NP budget and give DND contracting authority to match its initiation authority. Accept that it may take a few years before ADM(Mat) can spend everything. You will have immediate in-year results.

Do we do away with the DEI …
DEI should be the least of our worries
Unless DEI…
DEI didn't undercut …
Congratulations. You (Tristin Hopper) took this topic about a real defence problem and took it down a path completely irrelevant. DEI has nothing to do with the equipment availability problem, but it is great chum to keep the partisans distracted from what is really wrong.
 
Last edited:
Congratulations. You (Tristin Hopper) took this topic about a real defence problem and took it down a path completely irrelevant. DEI has nothing to do with the equipment availability problem, but it is great chum to keep the partisans distracted from what is really wrong.
Also it’s an “easy fix” (narrator: It isn’t) to drop DEI and everything will become all rainbows and unicorns.

I guess we’ll see in the next few months with our southern neighbours.
 
View attachment 89917



This is absolutely ridiculous to see laid out like this. How do we fix this? Is there a bottom where everyone says enough is enough? Do we do away with the DEI and go back to a warrior ethos? Is there a happy medium? I'm interested to hear everyone's thoughts and solutions.
What’s rediculous is trying to relate equipment failures and DEI hiring practices. No one’s missing parts because we’re trying to recruit minorities. We’re missing parts because of bad contracts and a 1 billion dollar cut to our budget.
 
Unless DEI siphoned a billion dollars from O&M last year (Coles Notes: It did not), it's not the problem. Chronic under funding of both O&M and capital procurements (as well as their glacial pace) is fueling the decline.
From my view, the problem with DEI initiatives is that they eat away at your most important commodity: Time.

There are 365 days in a year or broken down in to hours, 8760hrs in a year. Given a standard work week of 40hrs or (8hrs x 5days), you've only got 2080hrs of those 8760hrs available for whatever it is you want done.

I've been out for sometime now but I do remember quite a bit of institutional effort being dedicated to DEI initiatives in both time and resources. Mandatory DLN courses & Briefings, Workshops, Mandatory Reading Materials, etc. Ball-park figure I would use is it probably added up to a full 40hr work week with the amount of material that was expected to be digested....

So 40hrs of work on DEI initiatives per serving regular force member. Publicly available information states that the Regular Force strength is roughly "60000ish" and is about 15% short of the establishment strength.

40hrs x 60000 people = 2,400,000 work hrs.

That's over 2 million work hours of time spent on DEI, that provides no objectively measurable output to the bottom line of the CAF.

This isn't even accounting for the personnel that have been repurposed from their real jobs to new organizations stood up like the Chief Professional Conduct & Culture. This reallocation is happening in an era of scarce resources as well.



My Thought: Perhaps things wouldn't be moving at such a glacial pace if the institution got its priorities straight?
 
DEI is a bunch of nonesense; it's not even a recent underfunding, it's been like that my entire career of almost 20 years, coupled with operation demands that don't allow for things like maintenance.

Add in lack of people, hiring freezes and the massive growth in bureaucratic processes and it leads to way less happening than it sould.

Anyone that thinks a 'warrior ethos' will overcome decades of underfunding and chronic overtasking is probably rage baiting.
DEI is just a small part of a larger problem which you eloquently referred to as "chronic overtasking". IMO, the entire Defence Team lacks institutional discipline. Then again, that could also be said for our Govt writ large.
 
Back
Top