Hello. My name is Mike and I recently wrote my C-FAT testing in Ottawa, Ontario. Unfortunately I was unable to proceed into the trade I wanted to move in to, luckily this was my first time writing the test. When speaking to the recruiter he said I did not have a lot of things to offer for the field I wish to move into ( which was Naval Electronic Systems Operator). My question today is what kind of education would they be looking for in such a trade? I know I should have asked him at the time but it did not cross my head.
I have a college education in Police Foundations and also my high school diploma. Ultimately I have thought about taking a 1 year electronics course to help boost my resume. I was just wondering on what my next step might be and if there is a certain course I should take to help improve my resume.
Another question I have regards the acceptance of your trade. I was able to pass the combat arms and make artillery but I chose to come back at a later date and re-write the test, in hopes to make navy. If I was still unable to make the navy the second time I write the test would I be able to say okay and accept combat arms( artillery)? or could they shut me down.
Thanks very much, I appreciate any help and comments( polite and benefiting criticism is welcomed as well)
Mike K.
I have a college education in Police Foundations and also my high school diploma. Ultimately I have thought about taking a 1 year electronics course to help boost my resume. I was just wondering on what my next step might be and if there is a certain course I should take to help improve my resume.
Another question I have regards the acceptance of your trade. I was able to pass the combat arms and make artillery but I chose to come back at a later date and re-write the test, in hopes to make navy. If I was still unable to make the navy the second time I write the test would I be able to say okay and accept combat arms( artillery)? or could they shut me down.
Thanks very much, I appreciate any help and comments( polite and benefiting criticism is welcomed as well)
Mike K.

