C
c4th
Guest
armywoman said:I passed everything on the pt test except the run *&$%@!!!!
What PT test are you talking about? The two CF sanctioned PT tests are the express test, and the BFT. It sounds to me as if an old 400 test is being conducted here. If that is the case, I seem to remember that there was an advantageous scoring differential based of an age demarcation somewhere in the 30's.
Just recently I found out from a friend that my chain of command had let slip the results of my pt test. Some of the comments I found out about made even the rudest ones here look tame.
Sadly however the ones who have had the most to say, are HUGE themselves and they stopped doing all exercise as soon as the BFT was over, and don't start exercising until the next year.
Maybe some remedial leadership is in order here.
1. Reserves or regs pt should be mandatory everyday. ...I have tried arguing that at my reserve unit, but it is a money issue. 'They are only here part time if they get injured there are too many hassles for the military, if they get hurt' It has been a while since I got in, did we not have to sign something that explained the job and the expectations ???
Certainly anyone RegF or PRes Class B/C should be averaging PT every day where practical. Class A sub-units do not typically have the budget or the time to mandate any type of PT that is likely to make any difference to an individual soldier. CF98's are not that hard to fill out.
4.Regardless of the time and money pt should not ever be cut from course curriculum. It is too important to the job. If the day has to be longer to get things done, or the course an extra week..so be it.
Time and money are the left and rights of arc. If a course is long enough that a soldier's physical fitness can either be improved or a lack of physical training is likely to reduce a soldiers overall fitness level then, yes PT should be mandated. On any course less than three weeks, if soldiers show up fit there is no reason to burn a weeks worth of course resources in an already limited training system. Personally, I have usually derived more benefit from course content than course PT. Although, a refresher on points/marker drills is always amusing at 0530.
PT is a discipline, and it's hard work. Those I know who are old and fit, started out young and active, and generally have led a life of regular rigorous PT. Reg or Res, this seems to include at least some PT outside of normal working hours for most people. Physical bankruptcy is very hard to reverse, and does not get any easier with age.
I don't think I would recommend getting too wrapped around the axle on big short-term goals unless you have a decent base to work with. Shaving a minute off of a 2.4 km run is big. Going from 2 - 10 chin-ups is big. It would be better to commit to a lifelong level of physical activity and improvement than possibly setting yourself up for failure on the next PT test. 20 years from now your last run time will matter little if you gave up in despair because some score sheet thinks you need to run a 5 or 6 minute km.