Except I never said.And Social Judge Member Remius et Cie. confirm that Ms. Giuliano’s sentence to financial ruin is appropriate to the crime.
Nice…
No need to devolve and make this personal.
Except I never said.And Social Judge Member Remius et Cie. confirm that Ms. Giuliano’s sentence to financial ruin is appropriate to the crime.
Nice…
I stand corrected then.Except I never said.
No need to devolve and make this personal.
The bad apples? Absolutely.
Of course. But with the age of the inter web and everyone being offended by everything on every side of the spectrum this has been going on for some time. Every remeberance day we see plenty of offended people and businesses boycotted because of things like poppies. Or businesses that use perfectly legal business practices but that get boycotted by them.I used to frequent shops of people who I enjoyed their service, products and chit-chat, despite them having significantly different views. Yet we never let that difference interfere with the daily life, in fact we celebrated Canada as a place where two people of opposing views can sit down and have coffee/beer together without any drama.
no I meant the bad apples that are threatening her and her staff. Just like the bad apples who actually threw bricks through a couple downtown businesses or threatened staff for asking them to wear masks.I stand corrected then.
Perhaps I misunderstood your ‘bad apples’ comment.
Who were those bad apples, again? I thought you were referring to Ms. Giuliani and her like, who contributed to the GSM platform? No?
One could surmise with all the connections to the WEF at the top (Trudeau, Freeland, Singh), it would be them. Clause Schwab stating as much on video would corroborate this is the case... But that would be very conspiracy and tinfoil hat like to suggest... so...Question, brain trust. Considering the current situation, who do you think is really running Canada right now? Who is making decisions at the Federal level? Telford? Butts? The Cabinet? Freeland? I would dismiss our PM as being an intellectual lightweight and having no leadership skills at all so somebody must be pulling the strings. This may shed some light on the current lack of federal leadership. Thoughts?
One could surmise with all the connections to the WEF at the top (Trudeau, Freeland, Singh), it would be them. Clause Schwab stating as much on video would corroborate this is the case... But that would be very conspiracy and tinfoil hat like to suggest... so...
The Go Fund Me and GSG also showed the foreign wealthy right are certainly also involved.I don't think anyone can seriously deny foreign meddling is happening. Weather through the wealthy left leaning rich or the nefarious state actors like China and Russia.
Then I apologize for jumping to an incorrect assumption.Of course. But with the age of the inter web and everyone being offended by everything on every side of the spectrum this has been going on for some time. Every remeberance day we see plenty of offended people and businesses boycotted because of things like poppies. Or businesses that use perfectly legal business practices but that get boycotted by them.
no I meant the bad apples that are threatening her and her staff. Just like the bad apples who actually threw bricks through a couple downtown businesses or threatened staff for asking them to wear masks.
I used to frequent shops of people who I enjoyed their service, products and chit-chat, despite them having significantly different views. Yet we never let that difference interfere with the daily life, in fact we celebrated Canada as a place where two people of opposing views can sit down and have coffee/beer together without any drama.
Really? It's well established that all the enviro and anti pipeline movements are funded from places "other than Canada". The gov shrugs and says "so what?' Clearly in that instance the source of the money doesn't matter, but now the mukluk is on the other foot it's of deep concern? The new eau du toilet, Hypocrase', by the house of Gauche.Another example of good for the goose, good for the gander.
If a similar list of donors to, say, Antifa was hacked & published, would people be curious about who's donating? Including looking for people dumb enough to use their easily-identifiable email addresses? Or is their privacy and right to expression/association just as protected as the folks donating to this cause?
For two years I have been trying and trying to believe in Hanlon Razor. That most everything can be explained by that concept. And I have found that this is generally true in life. But that said more and more the tin foil tightens even when I try and loosen it. Just too many points are adding up. Even this EM points in the that direction. I can see no real need for it. The Feds, Prov and city have all the power to deal with the protestors before. It is a matter of will and logistics of resources not more executive power that was required.One could surmise with all the connections to the WEF at the top (Trudeau, Freeland, Singh), it would be them. Clause Schwab stating as much on video would corroborate this is the case... But that would be very conspiracy and tinfoil hat like to suggest... so...
Thuggery pure and simple. This is one of the tactics of the right (Nazi brownshirts) and the far left. In my mind these people who threatened the employees should be vigorously investigated, and prosecuted. AND their names very publicly announced.I read that the owner of Stella Luna (Ottawa Ice Cream and Gelato joint) got doxed. Now her staff is getting threatening calls.
"But then there’s Tammy Giuliani, the owner of Stella Luna Gelato Café, which has two locations in Ottawa. She made a $250 donation to the convoy on February 5. By Monday afternoon, her staff were getting threatening phone calls, and Giuliani was forced to close shop. We would be surprised if she’s never able to run a business in the town again. "
Emergencies Act Emergency Dispatch: Checking the convoy naughty list (twice)
Sloly is broke, the Emergencies Act is Woke, and Doxxing is still bad, em'kay?theline.substack.com
There are books on this subject. That Tides etc. are funded by outside money. Pipeline protests funded by rail interests. So now its a problem because the "left and others" are mad?Really? It's well established that all the enviro and anti pipeline movements are funded from places "other than Canada". The gov shrugs and says "so what?' Clearly in that instance the source of the money doesn't matter, but now the mukluk is on the other foot it's of deep concern? The new eau du toilet, Hypocrase', by the house of Gauche.
Part of me feels you give JT too much credit.For two years I have been trying and trying to believe in Hanlon Razor. That most everything can be explained by that concept. And I have found that this is generally true in life. But that said more and more the tin foil tightens even when I try and loosen it. Just too many points are adding up. Even this EM points in the that direction. I can see no real need for it. The Feds, Prov and city have all the power to deal with the protestors before. It is a matter of will and logistics of resources not more executive power that was required.
I've always said that this demographic I have highlighted needs to share their wealth first. Lead by Example, Bono? Oprah?I don't think anyone can seriously deny foreign meddling is happening. Weather through the wealthy left leaning rich or the nefarious state actors like China and Russia.
You know, when 3 levels of government are declaring it and emergency it may actually be an emergency.There are books on this subject. That Tides etc. are funded by outside money. Pipeline protests funded by rail interests. So now its a problem because the "left and others" are mad?
Here was my thought experiment. Throw darts.
In the next large labour strike or disruption in the country that effects say rail or air or a very important manufacturing sector. The strike goes on and the country economic output is hurt. The government can now declare EM act and first order the workers back, and then even freeze the bank accounts of the union and the dues paying members. That is using this new precedent setting move. Now I know the strike can be a legal strike but in this case the trucker protests have not at this time broke any law above bylaw and parking too. Also you say the union is legal. But some unions in Canada are also international ones with moneys from the US too.
The business and/or government can orders workers back with the law now...but it then goes to an arbitrator. But now we don't have to do that step. We can just declare EM. So....