- Reaction score
- 8,295
- Points
- 1,160
TRIGGER WARNING: The article taken from The Federalist. Read at your own peril.
The Canadian context...
From the article -
America is not next.
Canada is next.
But, hey, it's all right. We can ignore these folks as "unacceptable", a "fringe minority". Trudeau, Rutter and Ardern hold the Truth.
Pay Attention To The Dutch Farmer Protests. America Is Next
The same climate policies that are set to destroy private agriculture in the Netherlands are eventually coming to America.
thefederalist.com
The Canadian context...
From the article -
What Rutte and his government are doing to Dutch farmers, Schumer and Biden are planning to do to American farmers and American industries.....So pay attention to the roadside fires and blocked highways and mass civic unrest in places like the Netherlands and Sri Lanka. America is next.
America is not next.
Canada is next.
NP View: Trudeau ploughs ahead with fertilizer cut, while turning a blind eye to human suffering
The Liberals' decision to force farmers to reduce fertilizer use at a time of high inflation and increasing food insecurity is another example of a government that …
nationalpost.com
But, hey, it's all right. We can ignore these folks as "unacceptable", a "fringe minority". Trudeau, Rutter and Ardern hold the Truth.
Corporatism is a collectivist[1] political ideology which advocates the organization of society by corporate groups, such as agricultural, labour, military, business, scientific, or guild associations, on the basis of their common interests.[2][3] The term is derived from the Latin corpus, or "body". The hypothesis that society will reach a peak of harmonious functioning when each of its divisions efficiently performs its designated function, as a body's organs individually contributing its general health and functionality, lies at the center of corporatist theory.
Corporatism developed during the 1850s in response to the rise of classical liberalism and Marxism, as it advocated cooperation between the classes instead of class conflict. Corporatism became one of the main tenets of fascism, and Benito Mussolini's fascist regime in Italy advocated the collective management of the economy by state officials by integrating large interest groups under the state; however, the more democratic neo-corporatism often embraced Tripartism.[4][5]
Tripartism is an economic system of neo-corporatism based on a mixed economy and tripartite contracts between employers' organizations, trade unions, and the government of a country.[1][2] Each is to act as a social partner to create economic policy through cooperation, consultation, negotiation, and compromise.[1] In Tripartism, the government has a large role in the economy and engages in negotiations between labor unions and business interest groups to establish economic policy.[3][4]
Tripartism became a popular form of economic policy during the economic crisis of the 1930s.[5] Tripartism was supported by a number of different political movements at this time, including: Catholic social teaching, fascism, and democratic political movements.[5] Tripartism is a prominent economic policy in Europe, particularly where Christian Democratic parties influenced by Catholic social teaching have held power; it is a core part of the Nordic model seen in the economic systems of Scandinavia and the Benelux that were put in place by social democratic governments.