- Reaction score
- 5,103
- Points
- 1,160
He might be parsing the word "deploy". All sorts of support and logistical services can be provided to law enforcement so long as the public doesn't see green folks on the street.Taken from CBC FB page just now
He might be parsing the word "deploy". All sorts of support and logistical services can be provided to law enforcement so long as the public doesn't see green folks on the street.Taken from CBC FB page just now
How many of those firearms were secured properly and just seized to make a bigger show? If they're non-restricted and stored properly, why are they being seized? Clearly there was no intent to use them, both Windsor and Coutts were cleared with minimal arrests compared to the protest size and no violence. It's also Alberta, I'd be surprised if your standard freedom protest supporter person DIDNT have a properly locked firearm in their vehicles.Point??
Yes, and like many firearms owners in Alberta, they have modified mags to once again accept 30 rds, if you think someone who ignores one firearms regulation isn't going to ignore others, I have real-estate in Florida to sell you.How many of those firearms were secured properly and just seized to make a bigger show? If they're non-restricted and stored properly, why are they being seized? Clearly there was no intent to use them, both Windsor and Coutts were cleared with minimal arrests compared to the protest size and no violence. It's also Alberta, I'd be surprised if your standard freedom protest supporter person DIDNT have a properly locked firearm in their vehicles.
there’s a more fundamental problem with the Emergencies Act, arising from another definition. The Act isn’t about taking over provincial and municipal responsibilities for public order. It’s far broader than that: section 16 defines a Public Order Emergency as arising “from threats to the security of Canada” defined in the Canadian Security Intelligence Service Act (CSIS Act). Those definitions include “espionage or sabotage,” “foreign influenced activities,” (foreign donors unlikely to meet the definition) “serious violence against persons or property for the purpose of achieving a political, religious or ideological objective,” and the “overthrow by violence of the constitutionally established system of government in Canada.”
If that’s what we think is really happening in Ottawa, in Coutts, and elsewhere, then the prime minister might declare a national emergency, but thus far a compelling case that these protests are “threats to the security of Canada” as defined in the CSIS Act hasn’t been made by him or anyone else in a position of authority.
Greg Taylor served in the Canadian Army for 25 years. Following his military service, he worked as a provincial emergency manager and a consultant. He has significant experience planning for, and dealing with, public welfare and public order emergencies.
If someone is willing to drive over the speed limit in their car they're going to ignore other driving rules?Yes, and like many firearms owners in Alberta, they have modified mags to once again accept 30 rds, if you think someone who ignores one firearms regulation isn't going to ignore others, I have real-estate in Florida to sell you.
There is legislation about protesting while having guns and they would likely be considered in "Transport" mode. Utterly dumb to have a firearm anywhere near a protest, even if locked away and never touched or even mentioned.How many of those firearms were secured properly and just seized to make a bigger show? If they're non-restricted and stored properly, why are they being seized? Clearly there was no intent to use them, both Windsor and Coutts were cleared with minimal arrests compared to the protest size and no violence. It's also Alberta, I'd be surprised if your standard freedom protest supporter person DIDNT have a properly locked firearm in their vehicles.
Because he’s been surrounded by staff and bureaucrats with a ‘yes man’ mentality that he genuinely didn’t realize how much the entire country actually hates him until just now?Let's declare EM act.....oh look we found guns.
Just wait Freeland was pretty happy about getting into the country's financial system with no oversight.
Trudeau doesn't need the Act to do anything to with the protestors. So why is he doing it?
Yes. The ramming of the police, and the intercepted chatter that lead them to the house where they seized all that had a line in the briefing that said “remember to grab the .22’s so it looks bigger”How many of those firearms were secured properly and just seized to make a bigger show? If they're non-restricted and stored properly, why are they being seized? Clearly there was no intent to use them, both Windsor and Coutts were cleared with minimal arrests compared to the protest size and no violence. It's also Alberta, I'd be surprised if your standard freedom protest supporter person DIDNT have a properly locked firearm in their vehicles.
Ignoring the fact that it all took place before the announcement and discussion today.Let's declare EM act.....oh look we found guns.
Just wait Freeland was pretty happy about getting into the country's financial system with no oversight.
Trudeau doesn't need the Act to do anything to with the protestors. So why is he doing it?
It needs no expert analysis. All that matters is how does it look? And it looks bad.
If there's one event which will make the current government's case on their small arms policy, this is it.
![]()
You’re proposing that those pistols aren’t restricted? I don’t think that’s possible. And that the law abiding owners received an ATT to transport their pistol down to the ole protest so they could keep it locked in a box?How many of those firearms were secured properly and just seized to make a bigger show? If they're non-restricted and stored properly, why are they being seized? Clearly there was no intent to use them, both Windsor and Coutts were cleared with minimal arrests compared to the protest size and no violence. It's also Alberta, I'd be surprised if your standard freedom protest supporter person DIDNT have a properly locked firearm in their vehicles.
1x AR-15 Restricted Rifle.
I’ll let some of the real experts here analyze this.
Yes, human nature!If someone is willing to drive over the speed limit in their car they're going to ignore other driving rules?
Welcome to Canada, where you still have to prove someone guilty not force them to prove innocence. You'll also note I mentioned only the non-restricted firearms because if they're not in the "bust", that picture looks a lot weaker.You’re proposing that those pistols aren’t restricted? I don’t think that’s possible. And that the law abiding owners received an ATT to transport their pistol down to the ole protest so they could keep it locked in a box?
As I mentioned before the Raid press release mentioned trailers, was that meaning a Mobile home type trailer - or a Tractor-TrailerYou’re proposing that those pistols aren’t restricted? I don’t think that’s possible. And that the law abiding owners received an ATT to transport their pistol down to the ole protest so they could keep it locked in a box?