• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

GBAD - The return of 'FOBS'

And Thales doubling the production in Belgium of their version of the 70mm BAE APKWS II that is proving so popular on all launch platforms.


Bring back the CRV-7

Magellan and Kongsberg 2006 - the CRV-7 PG (Precision Guidance)


magellan.aero/wp-content/uploads/CRV7%20Fixed%20Wing%20-%20Web%20Version-1.pdf
 
"Standard" Lance turret, as found on the Rheinmetall Puma, knocking UAVs out of the sky. Not the fully equipped Skyranger.


And Belgians adding AI vehicle identification modules on their vehicles and smart munitions promoting local autonomy


....

Another reason for adding these to the Light Infantry Regiment's kit



If those then this


...

An MG team of three in a pickup truck with a pair of these small UGVs in the back enhanced by AI sighting systems. They even have tracks for the track afficionados. And they are small enough tobe lifted by a Griffon.
For these small UGV taking a stationary position, I could see the benefits of a line laid to the position with perhaps a very short ranged wireless link to the vehicle to reduce EM emissions and preserve battery life.

The next family of UGV's is one that reload/recharge the combat UGV and recover damaged ones.
 
I'm starting to wonder whether you should change the title of this thread. It seems that for quite some time we have moved beyond the Chinese FOBS.
This system, called a Fractional Orbital Bombardment System (FOBS), was designed to launch thermonuclear warheads on a south-to-north trajectory to take out northern-facing North American Aerospace Defense Command’s (NORAD) ballistic missile early-warning radars.
We're talking mostly in the area of the army field force GBAD or even Homeland local AD, and sometime we're talking about IAMD but rarely have we touched FOBS except peripherally. These are really three separate topics with IAMD encompassing FOBS.

🍻
 
I'm starting to wonder whether you should change the title of this thread. It seems that for quite some time we have moved beyond the Chinese FOBS.

We're talking mostly in the area of the army field force GBAD or even Homeland local AD, and sometime we're talking about IAMD but rarely have we touched FOBS except peripherally. These are really three separate topics with IAMD encompassing FOBS.

🍻

I would be happy to ditch the FOBS reference.

I don't know about splitting the threads as the technologies all overlap, all the way from C-RAM and C-UAS to the Golden Dome by way of the INTEGRATED Air and Missiile Defence.

I don't think you can separate launchers and command structures when hypersonic weapons bridge continents in minutes.
 
I would be happy to ditch the FOBS reference.

I don't know about splitting the threads as the technologies all overlap, all the way from C-RAM and C-UAS to the Golden Dome by way of the INTEGRATED Air and Missiile Defence.

I don't think you can separate launchers and command structures when hypersonic weapons bridge continents in minutes.
Yeah, if you want to just leave it as a generic ground based air defence then "GBAD" by itself would probably do. Just remove the FOBS stuff.

Do you still have the ability to edit the title or is that a moderator job? I have to say that "FOBS" get's me thinking of forward operating bases and not some Chinese nuclear missile strategy.

:unsure:
 
Yeah, if you want to just leave it as a generic ground based air defence then "GBAD" by itself would probably do. Just remove the FOBS stuff.

Do you still have the ability to edit the title or is that a moderator job? I have to say that "FOBS" get's me thinking of forward operating bases and not some Chinese nuclear missile strategy.

:unsure:

Its a moderator job.

Just call it All Things GBAD.
 
Back
Top