georgeharper said:
Because you are so set in your ways you refuse to hear anything else.
I mean really.
Really? Have you looked in the mirror when you said that? We form our own opinions here, as individuals, from researching a large number of sources. We also realize that some of those sources are not very reliable. Perhaps you should check a few of them out (In this case some specifice reading sources on Terrorism):
Terrorist Group Profiles: http://library.nps.navy.mil/home/tgp/tgpmain.htm
List of Terrorist Organizations: http://www.cdi.org/terrorism/terrorist-groups.cfm
Terrorist Groups Profiles Index of Groups: http://library.nps.navy.mil/home/tgp/tgpndx.htm
Foreign Terrorist Organizations (FTOs): http://www.state.gov/s/ct/rls/fs/37191.htm
List of terrorist organisations: http://www.answers.com/topic/list-of-militant-organizations
Australian Government List of Terrorist Groups: http://www.nationalsecurity.gov.au/agd/www/nationalsecurity.nsf/AllDocs/95FB057CA3DECF30CA256FAB001F7FBD?OpenDocument
Canadian Government List of Terrorist Groups: http://www.psepc-sppcc.gc.ca/prg/ns/le/cle-en.asp
CDI List of Terrorist Groups: http://www.cdi.org/friendlyversion/printversion.cfm?documentID=384
UK Government List of Terrorist Groups: http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/security/terrorism-and-the-law/terrorism-act/proscribed-groups
List of Militant Organizations: http://www.reference.com/browse/wiki/List_of_militant_organizations
Wikipedia List of Terrorist Groups: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terrorist_group
and also http://www.dkosopedia.com/wiki/List_of_terrorist_groups
TERRORIST ORGANISATIONS al-Qa'ida (Al-Qaeda): http://www.terrorismfiles.org/organisations/al_qaida.html
Perhaps you would like some News Sources too:
The BBC http://www.bbc.co.uk/worldservice/
The Christian Science Monitor http://www.csmonitor.com/world/iraq.html
The Sydney Morning News http://www.smh.com.au/
The Jerusalem Post http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?pagename=JPost/Page/IndexList&cid=1123495333395
The Frankfurter Zietung/Frankfurter Allgemeine http://translate.google.com/translate?hl=en&sl=de&u=http://www.faz.net/&sa=X&oi=translate&resnum=1&ct=result&prev=/search%3Fq%3DFrankfurter%2BZeitung%26hl%3Den%26rls%3DDVXA,DVXA:2005-37,DVXA:en%26sa%3DX
The Washington Post http://www.washingtonpost.com/
Shall I go on?
georgeharper said:
After the Americans spend billions bombing innocent civillans, invading and occupying countries, then setting up elections, do you really think they are then going to accept a result that was not favourable to the Americans?
I mean think about it.
The Americans have had many democratically elected governments overthrown because they were not American freindly
I thought about it. Yes!
How soon you want to forget the Americans and WW II. How many Europeans are not that friendly to Americans in Europe and Asia, after they insisted on setting up Democratic governments and brought peace to those nations over sixty years ago.
georgeharper said:
Now please, show me how Jack Layton is Taliban friendly
If unable to do so, then offer a public apology on this site
I see you are stuck on saving your hero's reputation, which I must say he earned honestly with his ill-informed comments on negotiating with the Taliban and pulling out of Afghanistan, only to allow the Taliban to regain control and continue with their barbaric ways. Tell me how pulling Canadian Troops out of Afghanistan is going to in any way help the Afghan people? Tell us all here.......Now!
And please take some time out there on the Island of Lotus' to use the Spell Check.