• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Greens Bash Ottawa About Not Buying Ships

The Bread Guy

Moderator
Staff member
Directing Staff
Subscriber
Donor
Reaction score
7,271
Points
1,360
Mods, feel free to shift if it's already being discussed elsewhere.  MSM links below.

Green leader slams navy and Coast Guard procurement cancellations
Green Party of Canada news release, 24 Aug 08
News release link

NEW GLASGOW - Green Party leader Elizabeth May today slammed the Harper government for canceling a multi-billion dollar plan to procure new vessels for both the navy and the Coast Guard.

"Canceling these projects is tremendously irresponsible," said Ms. May. "New supply ships for the navy and the 12 additional mid-shore patrol vessels for the Coast Guard are not simply luxury items but are essential to the successful day-to-day operations. Particularly in Atlantic Canada, the Coast Guard plays a critical role in protecting so many who make a living at sea and this latest Harper cash slash may be putting lives at risk."

Ms. May noted that the Harper government promise to repair the dysfunctional defense procurement system has apparently been broken but instead of acknowledging this problem, the government has chosen to blame the companies bidding on the contract.

"Just as the Harper government refused to follow its own procurement rules by giving a contract for Atlantic-based submarine refits to a BC company, this situation has been badly bungled. This latest reversal of a Harper promise, one announced by former Minister of Defence, Gordon O'Connor, is further evidence that current Defence Minister Peter MacKay is not able to deliver on issues that matter to Atlantic Canadians. No wonder the release to media was at 8:30 on a Friday night."

MSM  coverage here, here, here and here.

- edited to add more MSM coverage -
 
Wow... the Green Party criticizing the CANCELLATION of a project to procure Military equipment !!  :o
 
Jungle said:
Wow... the Green Party criticizing the CANCELLATION of a project to procure Military equipment !!  :o

Yup.....and if the Conservatives had gone ahead with a project that cost well above the publicly announced plans, they would have critcized then too !!
 
It surely can only be a coincidence that Ms May is running against the MND in Central Nova.
 
Ok I had to read that again...the Greens....who would have ever thought....
 
Shouldn't they be applauding the reduced carbon footprint of a smaller fleet? 
 
Michael O`Leary said:
Shouldn't they be applauding the reduced carbon footprint of a smaller fleet? 

:rofl:

I had not thought of it that way.....
 
Actually my DH pointed out that with the purchase of newer, updated ships, the replacements would more than likely be more environmentally friendly than the current AORs.

I had not thought of that point of view.
 
So then, is that their policy on the military ?

Environmentaly freidly weapons ?
 
Michael O`Leary said:
Shouldn't they be applauding the reduced carbon footprint of a smaller fleet? 

Actually their view on this is that the newer ships have more efficient engines, thus making them easier on the environment than what we are currently using.  Sorry, that's the environmentalist in me coming out.  ;)

Hey, if the Green's start following their European counterparts a little more often than they could become the "other" option.
 
Whoa, then I guess Toronto might have a shot at the Cup this year.

::)

Deadpan
 
Old Sweat said:
It surely can only be a coincidence that Ms May is running against the MND in Central Nova.

Hence this mention in the news release....
"New supply ships for the navy and the 12 additional mid-shore patrol vessels for the Coast Guard are not simply luxury items but are essential to the successful day-to-day operations. Particularly in Atlantic Canada, the Coast Guard plays a critical role in protecting so many who make a living at sea and this latest Harper cash slash may be putting lives at risk."

Translation:  fewer ships=fewer jobs in my riding+possible problems among the seagoing voters

All politics are local, right?

CDN Aviator said:
So then, is that their policy on the military ?

Depends who you ask when - this, from the party boss:
“The UN request for Canadian leadership in commanding its biggest mission reflects the high regard for our former experience and abilities in peacekeeping,” said Green Party leader Elizabeth May. “But after extending the combat mission in southern Afghanistan beyond the previous February 2009 exit date, the Conservatives apparently cannot even spare one single two-star general and a few support staff as requested by the UN. The Harper government’s abandonment of Canada’s traditional role as a peacekeeping nation has never been more obvious.”

This from the Central Nova Youth Dude
....There's really nothing wrong with having a sizable military as long as it is used responsibly. Of course nothing ridicules like China or America but bigger then what we have now. The military is an excellent subsidy out of the reach of NAFTA and other trade deals, and a lot of people in my home of Nova Scotia depend on the military for various jobs both in and out of the Armed Forces. Building a ship, planes or tanks creates a lot of employment. I think we as Greens should also create a law restricting the use of our armed forces. A majority of MP's can vote today to start a war, if the Government even wants to put it to a vote. This should be looked at carefully..../

From the deputy leader:
"Shocked and dismayed was how I felt", said Adriane Carr, deputy leader of the Green Party of Canada when she heard the news this morning that CBC is dismantling its Radio Orchestra for lack of funds.  "The CBC Orchestra's budget was less than one million dollars per year. The Harper government's 2008 budget just increased military spending by $270 million (a 1.5% increase to the $18.2 billion defense budget) and gave another $700 million for law and order and security measures ....  "The government's priorities are all wrong," said Carr, adding, "We need more music, arts and beauty in our lives, not more tanks, guns and war .... It bodes poorly for our country and culture if we keep increasing military spending and can't find a million dollars to keep an artistic institution like the CBC Radio Orchestra going," concluded Carr.

This from Green Party International Affairs critic Eric Walton
“What is happening today in the heart of Africa is a continuing crime against humanity. It is Rwanda, parts two and three,” said Mr. Walton. “But the Conservative Government has so reduced Canada’s military flexibility that it cannot answer the call for help even when it comes loud and clear. It is a shameful day for Canada when our country turns its back on the UN and refuses to assist those in such dire need of aid in the Congo.”

Not to mention traditional anti-Americanism from some candidates (including the boss)

 
Actually when I checked my "unread posts" and saw this story I thought someone must have spiked my tap water. :o
 
All these posts and not one....not one angry response to the oh so typical cancellation of yet another badly needed equipment purchase. The Armed Forces of this country are doomed if the so called Conservative guardians of our military begin playing Liberal fiscal games of cancellation. Gut our Navy at a time when the world short of energy wants everything we have. How do you spell stupid in Canada. C.O.N.S.E.R.V.A.T.I.V.E. Who will I vote for now.....nobody. They are now all the same.
 
Exarecr said:
All these posts and not one....not one angry response to the oh so typical cancellation of yet another badly needed equipment purchase. The Armed Forces of this country are doomed if the so called Conservative guardians of our military begin playing Liberal fiscal games of cancellation. Gut our Navy at a time when the world short of energy wants everything we have. How do you spell stupid in Canada. C.O.N.S.E.R.V.A.T.I.V.E. Who will I vote for now.....nobody. They are now all the same.

I guess you haven't been following the discusions on the JSS and those on what the Navy needs and doesn't need.
 
Exarecr said:
All these posts and not one....not one angry response to the oh so typical cancellation of yet another badly needed equipment purchase. The Armed Forces of this country are doomed if the so called Conservative guardians of our military begin playing Liberal fiscal games of cancellation. Gut our Navy at a time when the world short of energy wants everything we have. How do you spell stupid in Canada. C.O.N.S.E.R.V.A.T.I.V.E. Who will I vote for now.....nobody. They are now all the same.

My reaction to views like this is if you don't vote then don't complain, since you had absolutely no influence on the outcome.

As for the reaction to the cancellation, there's already a topic covering it.  The issue at hand here is the Green Party's reaction to it.
 
Exarecr said:
All these posts and not one....not one angry response to the oh so typical cancellation of yet another badly needed equipment purchase. The Armed Forces of this country are doomed if the so called Conservative guardians of our military begin playing Liberal fiscal games of cancellation. Gut our Navy at a time when the world short of energy wants everything we have. How do you spell stupid in Canada. C.O.N.S.E.R.V.A.T.I.V.E. Who will I vote for now.....nobody. They are now all the same.

Ummm hello haave you even checked the Naval forums here. Some of us have been commenting on quite a long time WRT the JSS. ::)
 
Exarecr said:
Who will I vote for now.....nobody. They are now all the same.

I really hate to break it to you there sport but politicians have all been generaly the same for years and years.

You could always waste your vote on the NDP

You could always vote for the ruin-the-economy-carbon-tax-party......err.....liberals

JSS was going to cost more than the government was willing to pay. They are not the only government in the world to do this. Whats the surprise here ? Cancel a program that was too expensive ( and by too expensive it means "beyond what the gov could reasonably sell to the taxpayers" ) and the military will propose something else. Remember that we need alot of other things in additions to new supply ships, so cost is a major factor. We spend too much on this, we cut comething else.

Its the same thing you do when you buy a new car for your family.
 
I am sure that Ms May will come out and add to her train of thoughts being "Green" and the way forwards.  There should use a renewable resource for the manufacture (Wood), and an eco friendly method of propulsion that has zero carbon foot print (Wind).  Now that's a green shift for you.
 
Back
Top