daftandbarmy
Army.ca Fossil
- Reaction score
- 43,199
- Points
- 1,160

There’s already very slow motion and frame by frame video out… he was basically right in front of the car at the start. She turned wheel hard left and reversed to back out as they approached the car and reached for her door handle. She stopped, wheel right and started moving forward- by this point he was basically in front of and just off the driver side bumper. Rather than side stepping when the car started moving he planted, drew, and fired.As a couple jabronis on the internet talking about some twitter videos and that photo I think you’re close for sure. I tried frame by framing the shots and the sound and I think you’re definitely tracking. I would spitball just off the drivers side front bumper on the side for the glass. But that’s just guys talking. Glass is always a lottery. You could strike it almost dead on and the exit will behave weird. But less so on “far side glass” from the shooter.
Speculation and conversation inbound…The next anticipated thing you’ll hear is “there was an officer on the other side of the car and I was worried they were in danger” but then you’re firing rounds through the vehicle…
That might be what's required for US civilians to reign in ICE agents acting like goons.Let me be clear I am not encouraging violence.
There is very slow motion video showing the agent clearing his weapon out of his holster….as she is reversing away from himThere’s already very slow motion and frame by frame video out… he was basically right in front of the car at the start. She turned wheel hard left and reversed to back out as they approached the car and reached for her door handle. She stopped, wheel right and started moving forward- by this point he was basically in front of and just off the driver side bumper. Rather than side stepping when the car started moving he planted, drew, and fired.
I’ll be interested to see what their lawful authority was for ordering her to stop the car and trying to detain her in the first place. It will be super important to determine what lawful duty they were actually in the course of when they were trying to order her out of the car.
I'd say that's a fairly normal response when police are escalating force with a driver in a vehicle that isn't following commands.There is very slow motion video showing the agent clearing his weapon out of his holster….as she is reversing away from him
Kind of hard for him to claim he was in fear of his life while drawing his weapon while she is REVERSING AWAY from him….but it does show his premeditation.I'd say that's a fairly normal response when police are escalating force with a driver in a vehicle that isn't following commands.
I don’t have any heartache with him drawing his gun, really. A moving car can still be very dangerous, and at least drawing is pretty trained in. My issue though is, given everything we see, the fact that he decided to plant and shoot.There is very slow motion video showing the agent clearing his weapon out of his holster….as she is reversing away from him
I was thinking about this and also training/policy.My issue though is, given everything we see, the fact that he decided to plant and shoot.
Are they engaged in any lawful activity? Not lawful intent, but rather lawful execution?I’ll be interested to see what their lawful authority was for ordering her to stop the car and trying to detain her in the first place. It will be super important to determine what lawful duty they were actually in the course of when they were trying to order her out of the car.
What will matter will, I think, be the particular activities they engaged in with regards to the victim. Based on the video, very clear case to be made that they were attempting to detain her. One person ordered her out of the vehicle, someone also went for her door handle- maybe the same person? Someone else may have been yelling at her to move. Someone confusion there. But it’s pretty evident that their attempted detention predicated her moving her car to try to get away. ICE have specific and limited legal authorities. In that interaction, were they acting within them?Are they engaged in any lawful activity? Not lawful intent, but rather lawful execution?
Thanks, Brihard.For anyone interested, DHS’ use of force policy is available online. It’s pretty decently written actually: https://www.dhs.gov/sites/default/files/2023-02/23_0206_s1_use-of-force-policy-update.pdf
I was wondering about that… I interpret it as deliberately putting oneself in a ‘must shoot’, which would be a really high bar. I don’t personally think he deliberately “I’ll put myself in front of the car so I can shoot her”… I think he was just really stupid and used poor tactics.Thanks, Brihard.
I just had a discussion with one of my fellow officers about what would appear to be "officer induced jeopardy" on the part of the ICE officer as outlined in III(c)(1) of the policy. Did he intentionally induce danger to himself by his positioning at the front of the vehicle?
There's also potential violations of V(A)(2) "disabling fire" and VI(B)(2)(a) Deadly Force against moving vehicles.
@brihard I was thinking larger picture, encompassing all of ICE activitiesAre they engaged in any lawful activity? Not lawful intent, but rather lawful execution?
Are you talking probable cause to attempt to detain or stop the driver? Or statutory authority?Are they engaged in any lawful activity? Not lawful intent, but rather lawful execution?
Officer induced jeopardy doesn't have to be deliberate. It could be the result of poor training or situational awareness (not reading the totality of the situation). Some of his fellow officers reactions would apeak to that with their "oh, hell, no!" type reactions.I was wondering about that… I interpret it as deliberately putting oneself in a ‘must shoot’, which would be a really high bar. I don’t personally think he deliberately “I’ll put myself in front of the car so I can shoot her”… I think he was just really stupid and used poor tactics.
Well sure. In a bigger picture sense, ICE still has legal authority to enforce U.S. immigration and customs law, even if they go about it very hamfistedly. I don’t know what they were up to in Minneapolis that day that led to this specific event, but presumably the typical mass immigration sweeps they’ve been doing of late.@brihard I was thinking larger picture, encompassing all of ICE activities
This raises the question of why he positioned himself in that spot since according to Kristy N, he only recently returned to work having already been run over and dragged by a protestor vehicle last yearOfficer induced jeopardy doesn't have to be deliberate. It could be the result of poor training or situational awareness (not reading the totality of the situation). Some of his fellow officers reactions would apeak to that with their "oh, hell, no!" type reactions.
FWIW, in some LEO-only space I’m in with a bunch of American cops, reaction to this has been overall quite negative. Not a lot of people seeing this as a good shoot.Officer induced jeopardy doesn't have to be deliberate. It could be the result of poor training or situational awareness (not reading the totality of the situation). Some of his fellow officers reactions would apeak to that with their "oh, hell, no!" type reactions.