• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

I Need To Know.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Anafax
  • Start date Start date
A

Anafax

Guest
First, I don't want to get people upset with me but I'm extremely confused about what to think when it comes to our involvement in other countries. I just turned 17 and I really want to follow my father in joining the forces. He got out 3 years ago and for some reason doesn't want me to join. I get mixed answers from everyone i talk to about what we're doing overseas so i thought I'd go to the horse's mouth for an answer. Do you think we're following the "true Canadian tradition" in helping the exploited or are we just being used to clean up a mess made by other people? I'm sorry if this question seems ignorant but I'm interested in getting your point of view. It'll help me make my decision, Thanks.
 
Son, generally I support people going into the Forces, especially youngsters. However times change and every set of circumstances are unique.  In your case you are still a very young fellow and there is going to be lots of time for you to contribute if that is what you want to do.  It isn't necessary for you to jump in both feet first just now.

I would suggest that until you can sort out the very crucial question you ask and come to an answer that satisfies yourself then you are better taking some more time to find that answer.  The commitment involved isn't one you should delegate to anybody else.

Lots of people here, and elsewhere, will be only too happy to tell you what they think, what they believe and counsel you both to join the heroes as well as to reject the murderers depending on their own beliefs.  Soldiers are neither heroes nor murderers.  They are simply soldiers.  They get paid for doing a very dangerous and necessary job for the government and the nation.  They don't always have much say in where they are sent and who they fight.  That is up to the government of the day and once you become a soldier you may find that your government changes, policy changes and you find yourself doing something you hadn't expected to do at all.  At that point whether you agree with the policy or not doesn't really matter.  The government, the army and the nation all expect that you will do what the government requires until your contract runs out.

If you can come to terms with that then you might be ready to sign on the dotted line.

My 2 cents worth.
 
I totally agree with Kirkhill, but I still thought I would put in my two cents.

I just turned 18 two days ago, yet I joined the CF through the ROTP program a few months ago.  My father was in the CF as a tank driver and he encouraged me to join.  I believe that all teenagers, once they hit a certain age, should serve in the armed forces for a few years.  It would give discipline to all the bad kids out there and we would have less problems. 

After joining, I have gotten mixed responses.  From teachers, some have told me to be careful and others told me I was going to be sent to Iraq (these people don't even know what they are talking about, we are not even in Iraq).  I had one cool teacher who used to be in the Rangers and he was totally supportive of me joining.  My close friends have supported me though they think I am going to die in war (I am not even in a combat trade).  Other people have just told me I was stupid saying stuff along the lines of, "I am now the Army's b****", "I have a deathwish", "I wish to die", and my all time favourite, one of my peers told me I was lazy in joining the CF to get free education and I was just on for a free ride and I am not going to learn any life lessons.

These are the people who have no clue about what actually happens.  Of course there have been Canadians that have died in Iraq, it is very sad and it is a point we cannot ignore.  Maybe we shouldn't be in some situations, but that is not really our decision, if we are sent somewhere we are trying to help the exploited, this is just my opinion though.  I still believe, no matter what, all people of Canada should serve in the Reg Forces or the Reserves for some time in their life.
 
Military everywhere clean up the messes made by other people.  And sometimes they are used to make messes at the behest of people.  Armies break things and kill people.  Whether or not they are justified in doing so is a question YOU need to know the answer to before you join the CF.

Read this site.  See what is going on over there (and here).  Read the news, then read the corrections and editorials on the news items here.  See which makes more sense to you.  Use that information to form your own opinion.  Don't take other people's advice blindly when deciding your career goals.

Remember a famous army saying:  Opinions are like ***holes...everyone has one, and they usually stink.  Go with the facts and form your own opinion.
 
Thank you all for your input.  I do think the military gives structure to a person and that a manditory 2 year commitment wouldn't hurt for a lot of young people. But when it comes to learning about how governments often use other governments and their armies for other purposes (Suez) then the ones they state at the time, then I get to wondering just how much truth is in it all and the question of being justified pops-up. I will always want Canada to do the right thing (I'm NOT saying we're not) but issues of us helping other countries interests blindly in Bosnia which some say was a propaganda war which 95% of Europe wanted nothing to do with from the start because of its futile nature and unseen American influence stirs my blood. What do I know?  We did the right thing, right?  American government reportedly built the Saddam regime to fight the Iranians and now the whole issue of Frankenstein destoying his monster only this time it's for his oil and the glory of the new Imperial Rome. This in't our way, right?  Do you think we did the right thing to keep our involvement minimal in that one? Looks like a big dog being torn apart by fleas.

Politics and soldiering don't mix, I know.  I've heard it hundreds of times.  But when it comes to WWII we don't have to think about right or wrong.  We were just! Period! Obvious! End of story!

These days everything seems to have 2, 3 or 4 back stories, plot twists and undiscovered truths that a person can't possibly know if they're doing anything for the right reasons or not. Somehow blind faith just doesn't seem too comforting to me.  That's why I wanted to see what the popular opinion is. If persons curently doing the job right now feel we're still following our tradition of helping the exploited or if we're just cleaning up a mess that americans feel won't yeild too much profit? They don't seem too overly interested in it anymore.

All of this is confusing to me.  I know Canada can kick alot of ass. The whole world comes here to learn from us how to do it properly so don't get me wrong, please.  We are NOT stupid by any stretch.

You guys are my big brothers and sisters. You've been there. I just want to hear it from you that it's worth it... or not.  They told me in school that before I start any job it's good to talk to the people already doing it,....so here I am. (Please don't punch me out for it.)

Thanks.
 
Well!  From your above post, you have either been fed a whole lot of Bovine Scatology, or believe in a lot of 'crap', or both.  I would say that in the next year, before you join you do a lot of reading and research, because you just spewed a lot of BS in your last post about Canada's Military, Domestic and Foreign Policies.  Read what is being posted in the other forums, and drop the Anti-American BS.
 
Politics and soldiering don't mix?  War is the extension of politics into violence.  The military executes political will from the barrel of the rifle and the mouth of the cannon.  World War II was as political as any other war.  It was not a battle of "good vs. evil".  There's plenty of good books out there on the subject.  My personal favorite author is John Keegan.  I would recommend you pick up some history books and gain some knowledge.
 
LeonTheNeon said:
John Keegan. 

Thanks Leon, You've been very helpfull. I browsed Keegan and definately will be looking at his books. There are 4 that I found.

- The First World War
- The Second World War
- The Mask of Command
- Six Armies in Normandy

Clausewitz's philosophy of war -- "States wage wars using armies in pursuit of political objectives. war will be fought not to pursue national interests, but to kill enemy leaders, to convert opponents to one's religion, to obtain booty, or sometimes, for simple entertainment."

The Prussian military thinker Carl von Clausewitz is widely acknowledged as the most important of the major strategic theorists. Even though he's been dead for over a century-and-a-half, he remains the most frequently cited.

"war is merely the continuation of policy by other means."  - Carl von Clausewitz.
 
I have not read Six Armies in Normandy, so I cannot say much on that.  But I've read the three others and they're all good.  I also just finished Intelligence in War which was great. 

Cheers, and good luck Anafax.  I hope you find the answers you're looking for.
 
Hey Anafax,

What trade was your Father?  Do you want to follow in his steps, or join as something else?

dileas

tess
 
the 48th regulator said:
  Do you want to follow in his steps, or join as something else?

That I haven't decided yet.  He was in the infantry. It would be nice to try this, this and this for a while...But that seems to be a bit like the horseman that galloped off in all directions.  I have many interests so I'll have to choose a path carefully before I do. Definately, I will start in the reserves while I attend University.

Hopefully that will sort me out.
 
George Wallace said:
From your above post, you have either been fed a whole lot of Bovine Scatology, or believe in a lot of 'crap', or both. 

My apoligies to you Mr. Wallace and thank you for your advice.
 
Be wary with Clausewitz. 

He uses a dialectic style which can be very confusing.  The problem ultimately is that since he is bringing together a union of opposites, you can find just about anything you want to find. 
Raymond Aron: “You can find what you want to find in the treatise:  all that you need is a selection of quotations, supported by personal prejudice.”

For example, he starts by defining the abstract concept of war... "unlimited war"... absent any outside influences.  I.e. if war is a "duel on a large scale" and "the act to compel the enemy to do our will" then there is no limit to the amount of resources which could/would be expended to achieve this.  Then merges this with his triumvirate: the people, the army and the government and espouses that it is impossible for a nation and its allies to bring the entirety of its people, army and government into play therefore war will always be limited unlike the abstract concept.  He also brings in thoughts on how the conditions of war will be molded by policy and ultimately by emotion.  These will determine the degree of limitation to the war.  All in all, a lot of wisdom but hard to read and comprehend again because it is a merger of opposite concepts into a unified concept.

I tried reading "On War" but got lost.  I don't feel too bad about this because...

Field Marshal Bernard Montgomery: "I did make attempts to read the writings of Clausewitz and Jomini . . . but I couldn't understand him myself."
 
Anafax said:
Thank you all for your input.  I do think the military gives structure to a person and that a manditory 2 year commitment wouldn't hurt for a lot of young people. But when it comes to learning about how governments often use other governments and their armies for other purposes (Suez) then the ones they state at the time, then I get to wondering just how much truth is in it all and the question of being justified pops-up. I will always want Canada to do the right thing (I'm NOT saying we're not) but issues of us helping other countries interests blindly in Bosnia which some say was a propaganda war which 95% of Europe wanted nothing to do with from the start because of its futile nature and unseen American influence stirs my blood. What do I know?  We did the right thing, right?  American government reportedly built the Saddam regime to fight the Iranians and now the whole issue of Frankenstein destoying his monster only this time it's for his oil and the glory of the new Imperial Rome. This in't our way, right?  Do you think we did the right thing to keep our involvement minimal in that one? Looks like a big dog being torn apart by fleas.

Politics and soldiering don't mix, I know.  I've heard it hundreds of times.  But when it comes to WWII we don't have to think about right or wrong.  We were just! Period! Obvious! End of story!

These days everything seems to have 2, 3 or 4 back stories, plot twists and undiscovered truths that a person can't possibly know if they're doing anything for the right reasons or not. Somehow blind faith just doesn't seem too comforting to me.  That's why I wanted to see what the popular opinion is. If persons curently doing the job right now feel we're still following our tradition of helping the exploited or if we're just cleaning up a mess that americans feel won't yeild too much profit? They don't seem too overly interested in it anymore.

.....

ohhhhkay... i just want to put in my perspective. This perspective of mine, please keep in mind is coming from a civie who is signing up , but a civi none the less.
POLITICS ARE VERY IMPORTANT. You can do the 'keep your head down and dont care' act and do what ever anyone tells you. Thats fine and it works. But keep in mind that if you do not know the politics surrounding a war, you are in alot of trouble.

in world war 1 and 2. Yes... we were right... because we won. The other side would have said the same thing as they built their summer home in your back yard. The fact of the matter is, that as a country we defended our ideals, just as any country does when someone breaches its borders or attempts to overthrow those in power. Its the ideals of a country that dictate its politics. North america/europe, beleive in democracy, in free enterprise and free thought. But come down hard on people that want to shut that down. All over the world there are groups who's ideals are contrary to ours. We can leave it alone, and let them build up their countries, or wallow in the rubble they make. But as canadians, we also have an additional 'ideal'. We want to help those that cannot help themselves. As a country, as people, as individuals, we choose to do this. With our healthcare system, our welfare system, and even to dropping a quarter into a less fortunate mans hands. We want to help make things better. So i dont think that people will at any time stop voting to send our troops overseas when they feel that there is something worth helping with.

Correct me if i am wrong, but politics builds schools that other factions burns down. Politics protects womens rights. Politics protects those that practice a religion contrary to yours, and ensures that there is peacefull co-existance.

Also, just as a point of fact. the only reason that we are having so much negative press since the 60's is the fact that the media has litterally exploded, letting people see the realities and horrors of war and conflict overseas and as 'imbedded' journalism. Most poeople see this and realize that war is not clean, its not simple trench warfare, real people live and die, and that there are bad things that happen. The public then wants to react and keep its people safe. thus canvasing for the retraction of its forces. This also is a force of politics.

Dont get me wrong. I'm not standing here on my little soapbox trying to state how the world works. This is only my perspective and i truly feel that these are my ideals. I feel them strongly enough to enlist, and be placed in harms way, and possibly (though hopefully not) have to give my life for it someday. I suffer under no preconceptions that i could be in afganistan one week, and then under another government the next week, building schools in south america. I am willing to be directed by the politics of my country.

(you may begin throwing rocks in my general direction)


 
Is the media and press used to manipulate the truth to suade public opinion to gain advantage and support to obtain political goals?  Wouldn't that be propaganda?  Distortion?  Brainwashing?

Like Clausewitz, out of context and without knowledge of the accurate political agenda trying to be obtained wouldn't the media be a dangerous place to seek something other than what governments want you to see and/or believe?

Do endless examples not already exist of the willingness to use the application of public manipulation?

The images of war is one issue. They can be used or not used in this manner to create simpathy or outrage can't they?  I'm curious about the reasoning behind war. 



 
OK

What is your game? 
Anafax said:
Is the media and press used to manipulate the truth to suade public opinion to gain advantage and support to obtain political goals?  Wouldn't that be propaganda?  Distortion?  Brainwashing?

This doesn't at all sound like a question about Recruiting, nor how to join the CF.

Nor does any of your other postings, including this:
Anafax said:
The images of war is one issue. They can be used or not used in this manner to create simpathy or outrage can't they?
 


I am curious:
Anafax said:
I'm curious about the reasoning behind war. 

Who are you really and what do you really want?  You aren't here to find out information on how to join the CF.  You aren't here to find out about life in the CF.  You have some other ulterior motive.  What is it?
 
George, based on his subsequent postings I would be amazed if this individual was 17 years old.  I am feeling suckered right about now.
 
Quoting Clausewitz at 17,

Yeh, I couldn't even pronounce Grolsch when I snuck into the pub, hence why I had to settle for Nasty 50.

Sniff sniff, I smell a troll...in fact is that two?? Ahh Nutts...I gues I may be wrong...

dileas

tess
 
Must not feed the troll.

Must not feed the troll.

So hard to resist, but must not feed the troll.
 
Back
Top