• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Indirect Fires Modernization Project - C3/M777 Replacement

Here's a question:

Why pair an Autonomous Multi-Domain Launcher with a Crewed HIMARs? Why not have a separate Command Vehicle that can operate remotely from the launchers with a lower profile? It can do the recce work as well.

Likewise for the RCH/AGM turrets. Remove the crews from the gun vehicles entirely. Have the guns play follow the leader with the Section Commander's vehicle.

...

Something else I just noticed

The AMDL version of the HIMARS is supposed to carry two pods of missiles like the MLRS, instead of the single pod of the HIMARS

1747526728572.png1747527000522.png

 
Last edited:
Here's a question:

Why pair an Autonomous Multi-Domain Launcher with a Crewed HIMARs? Why not have a separate Command Vehicle that can operate remotely from the launchers with a lower profile? It can do the recce work as well.

Likewise for the RCH/AGM turrets. Remove the crews from the gun vehicles entirely. Have the guns play follow the leader with the Section Commander's vehicle.

...

Something else I just noticed

The AML version of the HIMARS is supposed to carry two pods of missiles like the MLRS, instead of the single pod of the HIMARS

View attachment 93349

C130 movable with the two pods?
 
Here's a question:

Why pair an Autonomous Multi-Domain Launcher with a Crewed HIMARs? Why not have a separate Command Vehicle that can operate remotely from the launchers with a lower profile? It can do the recce work as well.

Likewise for the RCH/AGM turrets. Remove the crews from the gun vehicles entirely. Have the guns play follow the leader with the Section Commander's vehicle.

...

Something else I just noticed

The AMDL version of the HIMARS is supposed to carry two pods of missiles like the MLRS, instead of the single pod of the HIMARS

View attachment 93349View attachment 93350

The simple answer is vehicles break, and get stuck... Three dudes in a CP JTLV aren't going to be enough to get a convoy of autonomous vehicles unstuck.

Complex terrain needs human drivers, and lots of human power to fix things when things go wrong.
 
The simple answer is vehicles break, and get stuck... Three dudes in a CP JTLV aren't going to be enough to get a convoy of autonomous vehicles unstuck.

Complex terrain needs human drivers, and lots of human power to fix things when things go wrong.

And thus the MRT and Ammo trucks - if the mission requires it. The mission described in the ConOps video doesn't appear to leave much time to fix problems. I would be surprised if the trucks got off the runway before they launched, in that scenario. If they breakdown on the runway and can't get back into the aircraft then blow them up and take off.
 
Further to ...

1747528310159.png


Converting HIMARs into GRAD with US made 120mm rockets.


The Army has said in the past that it is actively looking at new munition pods for the MLRS and HIMARS launchers that can each hold up to 30 rockets with maximum ranges between approximately 18 and 25 miles (30 and 40 kilometers). Last month, it was announced that the service had awarded a contract to Anduril for 4.75-inch (120mm) solid rocket motors that is tied, at least in part, to that work.

Add on the RGK-122


The rocket version of the M1156 Precision Guidance Kit for the 155mm.

 
Further to ...

View attachment 93352


Converting HIMARs into GRAD with US made 120mm rockets.




Add on the RGK-122


The rocket version of the M1156 Precision Guidance Kit for the 155mm.

You do not want your GS batteries to need to be that close.

You would be putting HVT’s into enemy tube firing range, which is criminally stupid.
 
And thus the MRT and Ammo trucks - if the mission requires it. The mission described in the ConOps video doesn't appear to leave much time to fix problems. I would be surprised if the trucks got off the runway before they launched, in that scenario. If they breakdown on the runway and can't get back into the aircraft then blow them up and take off.
Again, I'm not against automation. I'm just against automation where it doesn't belong.

In reality, the C-130 and it's crew is far more valuable than any arty platform. So if it's safe enough to put a C-130 there, it's safe enough to put an arty crew in to shoot the guns/tubes.

How much more does an "autonomous" launcher cost than a crewed launcher?
 
Again, I'm not against automation. I'm just against automation where it doesn't belong.

In reality, the C-130 and it's crew is far more valuable than any arty platform. So if it's safe enough to put a C-130 there, it's safe enough to put an arty crew in to shoot the guns/tubes.

How much more does an "autonomous" launcher cost than a crewed launcher?

Not sure on the cost but it is likely the same PATH kit Rheinmetall is using on everything from Argo and Sherpa Missionmasters, to Wiesels, Man trucks, mining gear and airport luggage tractors.

They don't seem bothered about what vehicle they attach the kit to.
 



I am inclined to think that if your vehicle has power steering, automatic transmission, power brakes, cruise control, collision avoidance radar, a cell phone and a GPS system there isn't a lot left to buy. The app for the smartphone is probably all you need to add. Maybe a small PLC.
 



I am inclined to think that if your vehicle has power steering, automatic transmission, power brakes, cruise control, collision avoidance radar, a cell phone and a GPS system there isn't a lot left to buy. The app for the smartphone is probably all you need to add. Maybe a small PLC.
I don’t think you understand the requirements for autonomous vehicle support.
 
I don’t think you understand the requirements for autonomous vehicle support.

I have spent a lifetime automating processes. The process of automation continues. In the meantime people have been exploiting, and profiting from, the advantages automation offers even as they continue tp seek better solutions.

People try new things and learn to accommodate their new limitations.
 
And considering autonomous vehicles are nowhere on the RFP, maybe we can go back on topic until a company throws a hail mary and adds them to their bid?
 
Back
Top