- Reaction score
- 9,935
- Points
- 1,160
Here's a question:
Why pair an Autonomous Multi-Domain Launcher with a Crewed HIMARs? Why not have a separate Command Vehicle that can operate remotely from the launchers with a lower profile? It can do the recce work as well.
Likewise for the RCH/AGM turrets. Remove the crews from the gun vehicles entirely. Have the guns play follow the leader with the Section Commander's vehicle.
...
Something else I just noticed
The AMDL version of the HIMARS is supposed to carry two pods of missiles like the MLRS, instead of the single pod of the HIMARS


www.twz.com
armyrecognition.com
Why pair an Autonomous Multi-Domain Launcher with a Crewed HIMARs? Why not have a separate Command Vehicle that can operate remotely from the launchers with a lower profile? It can do the recce work as well.
Likewise for the RCH/AGM turrets. Remove the crews from the gun vehicles entirely. Have the guns play follow the leader with the Section Commander's vehicle.
...
Something else I just noticed
The AMDL version of the HIMARS is supposed to carry two pods of missiles like the MLRS, instead of the single pod of the HIMARS



Our First Look At The Army's Unmanned HIMARS Launcher Truck Firing
The Army sees the the Autonomous Multi-domain Launcher (AML) as an important way to increase firepower, but not personnel demands.


Exclusive: US Tests Autonomous Multi-Domain Rocket Launcher with Direct Support Fire Technology
Exclusive: US Tests Autonomous Multi-Domain Rocket Launcher with Direct Support Fire Technology

Last edited: