KevinB
Army.ca Relic
- Reaction score
- 29,403
- Points
- 1,260
Not to mention that SK isn't exactly a safe zone if something kicks off -- this would provide a safe zone production (unless you buy in the Big 51 insanity)
Indirect Fires Modernization Project - C3/M777 Replacement
- Thread starter MattGotts
- Start date
- Reaction score
- 16,820
- Points
- 1,160
I have zero faith that they will get to giving the Reserves useful stuff before the money taps get shutoff. Plus if they bought K9's for the Reserves, they would be broken down for most of their lives as there will not be enough maintainers and many will have to sit outside as they won't fit into many of the armouries.
Believe me I deeply hope I am wrong and well supported modern equipment flows to the Reserves. But my gut says I am right. Plus you don't have a lot of time before the current fleet says "We are done".
- Reaction score
- 38,598
- Points
- 1,210
The Army more than the rest of the CAF needs to get a grip on the sustainment enterprise - applies to Reg and Res.
They could install simulators in the Armories and base the actual K9s at the training centers. Hire the Techs to maintain them there. On a long stretch you could outsource most of the maintenance to local Civi companies. Ya someone is going to say they need security clearance and also know how to fix intricate optical electrical specialized systems. The civi world has more security cleared people then the Military, the equipment can be worked on at the local base if required. There are many more experienced trained people in the civi field who can work on intricate systems then in the military.
There are viable workable solutions if people stop saying "can't", (all that means is "won't)
KevinB
Army.ca Relic
- Reaction score
- 29,403
- Points
- 1,260
110%
The ARNG isn't anymore competent than the CA PRes, there is just funding and a will to do it.
- Reaction score
- 12,520
- Points
- 1,160
If it were me I wouldn't give the reserves any warfighting equipment.
I would pump any available capital into war stocks and maintaining them.
The regs and reserves both would draw from warstocks for training and deployment. Appropriate equipment would be drawn for the environment.
You don't need pride of ownership. You just need to enforce returning kit to stores in the condition you drew it.
You can keep LG1s, L119s, M777s, K9s and RCH/AGMs on hand in good condition and train for the situation of the day.
- Reaction score
- 38,598
- Points
- 1,210
The Army Reserve needs to lose a lot of its history and embrace the future instead.
Units need to have training areas within reasonable proximity. There needs to be a force structure designed for outputs, not perpétuation of fictional tales of heroism from the world wars. There needs to be institutional commitment to members, and member commitment to the institution.
MilEME09
Army.ca Fixture
- Reaction score
- 7,001
- Points
- 1,210
The defense of canada division means they gotta actually invest in reserve sustainment.
- Reaction score
- 38,598
- Points
- 1,210
Or invest in sustainment for the Army Reserve.
MilEME09
Army.ca Fixture
- Reaction score
- 7,001
- Points
- 1,210
Well when we are being told we will do all first line and limited second line. They better put the money and training where their mouth is or its all going to fall apart real quick
- Reaction score
- 12,520
- Points
- 1,160
The CAF is "infantry-centred". That means focusing on man-power and equipping the man.
Ukraine is demonstrating that the world has moved on. With automation and drones and withdrawing men from the field everyone is now a gunner.
Gunners man the equipment.
1st question
Given the current situation what equipment do I need?
2nd question
Who is available to operate the equipment?
Ukraine is demonstrating that the world has moved on. With automation and drones and withdrawing men from the field everyone is now a gunner.
Gunners man the equipment.
1st question
Given the current situation what equipment do I need?
2nd question
Who is available to operate the equipment?
The Regular Force should also then.
That's a large problem for units on the West Coast or northern parts of the provinces.
How about the we stand up a Air reserve with Helicopters and Hercs who can fly to local Airports, Pickup the units and deliver them to the training areas. You can male it as tactical or as non tactical as you want. Arrive to the training area a hour or three later. Do your training and fly them home at the end of the training.
Loose history and you loose purpose.
I agree, not much commitment level from the employer, there is a lack of commitment from the workers.
Buy the equipment, allocate the training money, spend the money and they will come.
- Reaction score
- 38,598
- Points
- 1,210
Somehow CSS and engineer units can be amalgamated and renamed and they continue on just fine; why are the infantry, artillery and armoured such snowflakes?
KevinB
Army.ca Relic
- Reaction score
- 29,403
- Points
- 1,260
I think that is an unfortunate fiction that many seem to have acquired. Personnel still need to seize and hold ground -- that has not changed since the time man first picked up a rock.
Again I think you are simplifying the equation - instead of looking at what the situations look like outside of Ukraine.
1) Small Wars
2) Medium Wars
3) Global Non Nuclear Conflict
One needs to look at Ukraine sort of like the Korean War -- we (the West) failed to act early enough to provide forces to stop the situation from escalating - but it is a regional conflict with global repercussions.
That does mean that there still will not be small dirty wars like the 60's and 70's, and quite frankly I suspect that we will see more of these as our opponents realize that method is a lot more efficient to impede our progress than a larger one that will also militarily and economically degrade theirs. But forces also need to be ready to deter and destroy hostile incursions large or small into friendly territory.
Every man women and child who wants to remain speaking their choice of language and exercising democratic freedoms that are taken for granted.
It is much better to have a Conventional Force that is well equipped for a LSCO. Currently on the land battle side there is no better option than Combined Arms formations for that -- sure some tools have been added and/or refined - but that has not changed remarkably since WW2.
Fires are needed, and LARGE amount of them -- predominantly Tube Artillery - but also rockets and missiles.
Ranges for some things have increased - but at the soldier in the trench aspect - the majority of combat is still inside 300m.
More and more uncrewed systems will be added, but there are still personnel needed on the ground - in the air, and both on and under the sea.