markppcli
Army.ca Veteran
- Reaction score
- 6,404
- Points
- 1,260
Well the BMP3 / BMD 4 is so effective how could they not
Infantry Vehicles
- Thread starter KevinB
- Start date
- Reaction score
- 22,090
- Points
- 1,260
The goal of the 50mm cannon is to provide a number of additional capabilities that the smaller caliber cannons cannot.
Honestly the 40mm CTA turret that was to go on the Warrior would frankly be my favorite as it’s a lot more versatile and compact than the 50mm. But apparently the Army has test again a threat matrix that only works with one particular setup (shocking I know).
Honestly the 40mm CTA turret that was to go on the Warrior would frankly be my favorite as it’s a lot more versatile and compact than the 50mm. But apparently the Army has test again a threat matrix that only works with one particular setup (shocking I know).
GR66
Army.ca Veteran
- Reaction score
- 4,200
- Points
- 1,160
Here's another one for @Kirkhill and his Light Battalions...
defence-blog.com
Flyer Defense unveils “The Beast” at AUSA show
The Flyer Defense has unveiled the Flyer 72 Multi-Purpose Mobile Fire Support System, nicknamed “The Beast,” at the largest land warfare show in America. During the Association of the United States Army (AUSA) annual meeting and exposition, the company displayed the specialized configuration of...
defence-blog.com
- Reaction score
- 8,329
- Points
- 1,160
Here's another one for @Kirkhill and his Light Battalions...
Flyer Defense unveils “The Beast” at AUSA show
The Flyer Defense has unveiled the Flyer 72 Multi-Purpose Mobile Fire Support System, nicknamed “The Beast,” at the largest land warfare show in America. During the Association of the United States Army (AUSA) annual meeting and exposition, the company displayed the specialized configuration of...
Gee. I dunohhh. That may be too much of a Swiss Army knife even for me.
- Reaction score
- 8,329
- Points
- 1,160
For clarity...
This is too much of a Swiss Army knife for me.
As the man sez - it would make a great boat anchor.
partsolutions.com
This is too much of a Swiss Army knife for me.
As the man sez - it would make a great boat anchor.
Engineering the World’s Largest Swiss Army Knife the Wenger Giant
The Wenger Giant is the world’s largest Swiss Army knife, has 141 functions into 87 implements. At 9” wide and 32 oz, you could use it as an anchor for a boat.
partsolutions.com
- Reaction score
- 22,090
- Points
- 1,260
With room for only 2 personnel as well…Gee. I dunohhh. That may be too much of a Swiss Army knife even for me.
markppcli
Army.ca Veteran
- Reaction score
- 6,404
- Points
- 1,260
Semi related; Belgium is re arming and equipping its maneuver forces to the interoperable with their chosen big brother in France. While I’m not a fan of the Griphon (to tall for pepper conflict with to small a gun) the concept is sound and the mortar carrier would be nice.
- Reaction score
- 22,090
- Points
- 1,260
I’m still of the opinion that Canada would be best served by outfitting Bde’s to work inside US Div’s.
1 Abrams/Bradley Bde for Europe (30/70)
2 LAV Bde for Striker interoperability and PSO’s. (70/30) and (30/70)
1 Light/Abn to XVIII Corps for QRF (100/0)
1 Light/Abn for 11th Abn in Alaska (70/30)
1 Abrams/Bradley Bde for Europe (30/70)
2 LAV Bde for Striker interoperability and PSO’s. (70/30) and (30/70)
1 Light/Abn to XVIII Corps for QRF (100/0)
1 Light/Abn for 11th Abn in Alaska (70/30)
FJAG
Army.ca Legend
- Reaction score
- 13,901
- Points
- 1,160
But think of how much we'd have to spend in order to translate all those FMs into bilingual format.
Seriously, we were always organized to be interoperable in British formations. When we went through the whole Sixties identity crisis thing we went out of our way to be our own man even when it complicated sustainment to a point where we really have a hard time doing it.
I'm still a firm believer that Canada needs one operational, deployable div HQ if for no other reason than to have a foundation around which our staff training takes place and as a core around which a deployable formation can grow. Concurrently we need to be able to integrate into a US Div as well as the various multinational divisions that are springing up around Europe.
That flexibility will require a very robust and adaptable logistics system which we currently seem to pay only peacetime lip service to. The more we can standardize on equipment the more we'll be able to draw on larger theatre level supply and maintenance resources rather than having to reach back to Canada. My guess is that even if part of a multinational division we would be better off if we could draw on American theatre level resources through standardization with them.
- Reaction score
- 8,329
- Points
- 1,160
As noted on the future structure thread
1 Division
2 LAV Brigades
Follow the pattern of US 2 Inf Div
Add in the Abn BCT of the 11th Abn Div
It only has two battalions.
- Reaction score
- 22,090
- Points
- 1,260
You still need a Heavy Metal Bde to show the flag in Europe or other area of heavy fighting.
- Reaction score
- 22,090
- Points
- 1,260
110%But think of how much we'd have to spend in order to translate all those FMs into bilingual format.
Seriously, we were always organized to be interoperable in British formations. When we went through the whole Sixties identity crisis thing we went out of our way to be our own man even when it complicated sustainment to a point where we really have a hard time doing it.
I'm still a firm believer that Canada needs one operational, deployable div HQ if for no other reason than to have a foundation around which our staff training takes place and as a core around which a deployable formation can grow. Concurrently we need to be able to integrate into a US Div as well as the various multinational divisions that are springing up around Europe.
That flexibility will require a very robust and adaptable logistics system which we currently seem to pay only peacetime lip service to. The more we can standardize on equipment the more we'll be able to draw on larger theatre level supply and maintenance resources rather than having to reach back to Canada. My guess is that even if part of a multinational division we would be better off if we could draw on American theatre level resources through standardization with them.
OldSolduer
Army.ca Relic
- Reaction score
- 15,723
- Points
- 1,260
Heavy Metal Bde Metallica!!!
daftandbarmy
Army.ca Dinosaur
- Reaction score
- 32,539
- Points
- 1,160
Colin Parkinson
Army.ca Myth
- Reaction score
- 12,009
- Points
- 1,160
- Reaction score
- 357
- Points
- 780
Lotsa Sherman monuments and AA pieces on display. Russiam model Reduce, recycle etc.
daftandbarmy
Army.ca Dinosaur
- Reaction score
- 32,539
- Points
- 1,160
Looks a bit 'tippy', like the much maligned Fox:
Fox armoured reconnaissance vehicle - Wikipedia
Retired AF Guy
Army.ca Veteran
- Reaction score
- 947
- Points
- 1,160
I was thinking the same thing. The video only shows in operating on flat surfaces.Looks a bit 'tippy', like the much maligned Fox:
Fox armoured reconnaissance vehicle - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
And the thing is that there are several Canadian companies (besides GDLS) that manufacture light armoured vehicles and could probably build something similar here at home.
GR66
Army.ca Veteran
- Reaction score
- 4,200
- Points
- 1,160
Just throw that turret on a TAPV (Tippy Ass Pathetic Vehicle)Looks a bit 'tippy', like the much maligned Fox:
Fox armoured reconnaissance vehicle - Wikipedia
