I think Russia and China have both in the near past made threats of trying to lay claim to land up north. But not sure how viable it really is, but not something to ignore completely.
Informing the Army’s Future Structure
- Thread starter dimsum
- Start date
- Reaction score
- 11,189
- Points
- 1,160
And what forces does the US hold at readiness domestically?
And why is your bossman, and his predecessors, asking us to do more domestically?
- Reaction score
- 5,832
- Points
- 1,260
I would posit that he (and Biden, and Obama, and Dubya, and, and, and…) were asking us to do more externally to share their expeditionary load. We ignored them.
- Reaction score
- 11,189
- Points
- 1,160
Just did some quick figuring based on on-line numbers.
A budget of something between 200 and 500 million CAD would suffice to supply a body of 32,000 with:
Uniforms, PPE, a smart phone, a side arm and a carbine.
A C9 and an M320 GL for each fire team.
A C6, a DMR and a CG84 for every two fire teams
A new Silverado 1500 4x4 Crew Cab every 4 years for every fire team.
....
In a 5% of GDP Universe (100 Billion CAD a year, 400 Billion every 4 years or 1 parliament), those numbers amount to rounding errors.
Ensure the primary reserve has at least those capabilities then you can start building your real army on top.
A budget of something between 200 and 500 million CAD would suffice to supply a body of 32,000 with:
Uniforms, PPE, a smart phone, a side arm and a carbine.
A C9 and an M320 GL for each fire team.
A C6, a DMR and a CG84 for every two fire teams
A new Silverado 1500 4x4 Crew Cab every 4 years for every fire team.
....
In a 5% of GDP Universe (100 Billion CAD a year, 400 Billion every 4 years or 1 parliament), those numbers amount to rounding errors.
Ensure the primary reserve has at least those capabilities then you can start building your real army on top.
PrairieFella
Army.ca Veteran
- Reaction score
- 3,342
- Points
- 1,110
Which in all fairness was totally justified. The Americans laid the pressure on heavy for us to join two of the worst geopolitical disasters of recent times, the Vietnam and Iraq Wars.
daftandbarmy
Army.ca Fossil
- Reaction score
- 41,361
- Points
- 1,160
- Reaction score
- 17,958
- Points
- 1,160
While legislation isn't sacrosanct, I like to start with what is available off-the-shelf. That means full-timers and part-timers broken into easy to work with classes: primary, supplementary and Canadian Rangers (and yes cadet instructors) One needs a plan as to what the end product is that you want.
Regular is easy - who do I need today and every day. So is Primary - who do I want trained and equipped today at tiered readiness for when I need them tomorrow. So is Supplementary - who do I want to keep around for a while when their term of service as regular and primary is complete. All of those have to be relatively fit.
The class you are looking for as your primary feed stock is the Rangers who we underutilize in the extreme. We need to stop thinking of them as small aboriginal force on snowmobiles in the north. With just a smidgin of imagination and a pipeline to leadership and equipment you can turn them into a cheap multi-purpose force throughout Canada.
Try as I might, I can't find a budget line for them but it has to be the lowest human resource cost per annum, per capita. There's a lot of room as to how we utilize and administer them.
No problem but you really need to know the size of the force and its roles in order to build the right stocks and secured warehouses and compounds etc. - do we need pickups, buses, rifles, C-UAV etc etc?
Like all things in life you need priority lists, budgets, and plans. We're all talking revolutionizing structure to organizations that have had few original thoughts in decades and tend to fine tune the familiar. Good luck.
- Reaction score
- 5,832
- Points
- 1,260
But not just there, but in many other theatres. For instance, we have been pressured a lot by Washington lately to take up the mantle in Haiti. And usually when our answer to Vietnam and Iraq was “No”, their next ask is “Where can you deploy so we can redeploy our forces?” I’m sure they would be tickled pink if we deployed a couple divisions to the Baltics.
However, my overall point was that Washington (bipartisanly) is not asking us to increase our defence spending for domestic defence.
Don’t forget about the $100 million for the armoury to house less than 100 effectives. Seriously, in some, maybe most, cases the most expensive part of equipping a reservist is not the gear in his hands, it’s the roof over his head. Infrastructure has to be factored in.
Is a dedicated DND armoury required?
On the prairies there are warehouse with office buildings almost everywhere. Oil &Gas love them and leave them. Fenced compounds. External pads, even plug in parking. Lease rather than use capital dollars
GK .Dundas
Army.ca Veteran
- Reaction score
- 2,412
- Points
- 960
I have suggested this before and also note that a lot of them come with either rail sidings going through them or nearby.
As well as easy access to the local highway system.
The CAF has been using a wide variety of solutions, including new builds, legacy/heritage buildings, and buildings abandoned by the Reg Force (NDMC is one). All are expensive options. There’s also been an experiment in using modular FOB-style buildings - 30 Fd Regt RCA moved into this when their old legacy building self-divested, can’t speak to the cost but it might be the way forward.
